Case Information
*1 AP-77,047 ™hD™™^, ,nDC, e COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (cid:127) a,,«t-hi -rr-^*r> AUSTIN, TEXAS
April H, 2015 Transmitted 4/13/2015 3:48:05 PM Accepted 4/14/2015 10:26:09 AM ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK NO. AP-77,047 ABELAc?eSrk KENNETH THOMAS () IN THE COURT OF VS. () CRIMINAL APPEALS <t£/
0 THE STATE OF TEXAS () OF TEXAS t
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF ^ TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
NOW COMES Appellant in the above-styled and numbered cause, and, pursuant to Rule 38.6 and Rule 10.5(b) Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, submits this Motion requesting that the Appellant be granted additional time in which to file the brief in the above-styled and numbered cause, and in support of same would show the Court the following:
I. (a) Trial Court Designation: 194™ Judicial District Court
Cause Number: F86-85539-M
(b) Offense: Capital Murder
Punishment: Death
(c) Date of extension sought for May 29th, 2015
brief:
(f) Number of prior extensions: 1
(g) Facts relied upon to support extension:
Appellant's counsel requests the additional time to complete this death penalty appellate brief. The brief is currently 75% completed. The testimony has been summarized for the initial draft of the brief. All possible issues have been identified. There is still required legal research needed to determine the *2 issues that are viable for presentation. In particular this case presents unusual issues concerning a jury trial on competency that was conducted during the retrial of the punishment issues involved in this case and the case of Hall v.
Florida was handed down by the Supreme Court of the United States concerning intellectual disability as applied in death penalty cases. This Supreme Court case affected the individual voir dire procedure and charge to the jury as a special issue of intellectual disability that was submitted to the jury. Appellant's counsel is doing extensive research to present these issues concerning intellectual disability with the most up to date legal discussion possible in the brief for Appellant. Appellant's counsel requests additional time to complete research of possible points of error and final draft of brief to be submitted on behalf of Appellant. Counsel has spoken to the State's assistant district attorney, Ms. Christine Womble and she has no objection to this extension of time. Counsel does not believe any additional time past that requested herein will be necessary to complete Appellant's brief for filing.
II. The Appellant has been diligent in pursuing this appeal and is not seeking this extension for purposes of delay.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this Motion be granted.
Respectfully submitted, /si John Tatum John Tatum 990 S. Sherman Street Richardson, Texas 70581 (972) 705-9200 Fax #: (972) 690-9901 State Bar No. 19672500 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of this Motion has been delivered to Susan Hawk, Dallas County District Attorney, or to her Assistant District Attorney in the Appellate Section assigned to this case, at 133 North Riverfront, 11th floor, Frank Crowley Criminal Courts Building, Dallas, Texas 75207, on this the 13th day of April 13,2015.
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Icertify that this submitted e-mail attachment to file Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief complies with the following requirements of the Court:
1.The petition is submitted by e-mail attachment; 2. The e-mail attachment is labeled with the following information: A. Case Name: Kenneth Thomas
B. The Appellate Case Number: 77,047
C. The Type of Document: Motion to Extend Time
D. Party for whom the document is being submitted: Appellant E. The Word Processing Software and Version Used to Prepare the Motion :
Word Perfect X7
3. Copies have been sent to all parties associated with this case. 4/13/15
(Signature of filing party and date)
(Printed name)
John Tatum, Attorney at Law
Emailed Copy of Motion