My name is Morth Vasquez, I make a desperate attempt to have this heopened and Peapedy misstiyoted. In good faith I may look forward to have moved into another District Court.

I would, Further show this Cet. of Caim. Appents as Fellows, (A), Researcherial Ans Conduct, And possible intentional mislepresentation by the exact assigned Counsels, Caim. attorney Mr. James M. Brooks // Appellate attorney Mr. Bob Wicert.

*2 And that of Yonj Musell the first assigned appeal attorney who removed herself without Reason-justified. As Defendant in care-causer no. 1352806, conviction for fatigue to legistat also alleges that the condert violates procedures ifides and substantial Amend clauses of Defendant Rights.

Not only the "in count proceedings" need investigation but where the "outside of the court's knowledge" (e.g., outside investigative work, Houston Police Dept. involvement, complaint BEfoRf defendant arrest to which eventually led to his arrest.

As Defendant in this conviction alleges, that UN CATIAS (warrant) was produced, UNITIL TY "into confinement a Harris Caty sheriff office, 1200 Doker N 701 N.Jam Pacinta, Houston, IN 1969

Defendant believes are the Cciv App. ORBERS believe of trial LRR II transcripts, testimony of DA conference with arresting officer of cell phone records, events that that are relevant if that transpirad outside the event's knowledge on November 194.-2011, in the streets of Houston. Unit Vehicle was Unmodified L. II e the time.

Also comes to Question defendant Houston Police Dept. Records which would Reveal UN FalsnY active warrants and where defendant had sewerd 7 days for "misdemonol entitions,

*3 Here would VEKIFY that without Question never existed a warrant For the unrest of Martin Vasquez on that day all in the past 13 months.

Reoscutial in this case may have used imprapure methods calculated to produce a wrong fat conviction and vindictiveness because deErandant demanded a trial.

C.G.C. Appeal Pustices must order conference with trial prosecutor in the 351st. District Court, along with Pames M. Brooks assigned enim attannoy, Yeni maselli and Bob Wicoff both assigned appeal attannys for the Public Defender office. C.G.C. Appeal Pustices must order DO-TH attannoy to Re-considerlepresentation of Martin Vasquez, cose- cause no. 1352006 in Re-submitting defendant appeal brief with the truth, facts and Laws STATISTILY deguined of Pames M. Brooks and Bob Wicoff.

Defendant Vasquez would further argue that the acts of misconduct justifies declaring a mistrial, isthene M. Brooks could have ordered a mistrial and also submitted to the teial Court the PKUPEE motion for new trial. Defendant believes it so infect us all the trial with unfairness as to make the Resulting conviction a denial of Due Process, Elight to a Fair trial and impractical study.

*4 This conlietion may be the wrth mone than procedural arnols, but violation of my 4th, 5th 6th, 8th and 14th. Amend. Penititational protreetions. One aheto may wunnant Keverbal of this Aug. 27th-2015 conitation. Impraper conduct of assigned enim. ationny and appeal attianey may have wuived due diligente $\Theta$ the time of conminal preserdings And uppeslate preserdings, obvious ERKoks. Resekving of these arnols were wuived and may have pasjudiced defendant Vasques substantially night to a fone teal II Access to the P.O.Appeal and e.uc.pppual. For letixt, Asl. Breoks and Asl. Wicoff along with presceation conduct was imprapel, eunmulative effect of imprapatistics, against Vasques. Whethel the passing teial judge fie the 3stst. Distant Coust wuived ANY exnotive action, This trial eounts disbadee may have Denied night to a fone teal by causing Suny to eaninet on grounds beyond posjudicial defects but nuthal fund. substantial conititational lights of Muntin Vasques Whethel these acts imprapel by presceation, teial judge and Aaqued attianays to this case eanstitute Inetractive Aristence undal Strellland, deps were not taken by asl. Gumes m. Breoks and Asl. Bob Wicoff to mitigate arnils effects, and because acts were intanled to lead to eaninet Muntin Vasques nuthal guilty as innocent. L. File: $\mathcal{\&}\mathcal{a}\mathcal{m}\mathcal{p}\mathcal{;}\mathrm{L}\mathrm{I}$

Beapuically: Asl. Vasques