The records show that on OCTOBER 20, 2014 The Applicant served 202n Criminal District Court of Bowie County, Texarkana, Texas an Application for Habeas Corpus Relief. Because the District Court failed to respond in accordance with the statue, applicant filed the application in this court seeking 'Original Jurisdiction'.

This [C]ourt construed applicant's application as a PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, and on FEBRUARY 04, 2015 ORDER issued upon the 202nd Criminal District Court to [Submit the records on such habeas corpus application i.e; 'a timely filed order which designates issues to be investigated (see MOCREE v. HAMPTON 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App 1992), or stating that Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Bowie County'. ]

NOTICE: On MARCH 09, 2015 [A]pplicant was in receipt of a white Post Card from the clerk's office of this court bearing the cause number [98F0331-202B] [WR-13,573-10] stating: "ON THIS DAY, (2/23/15) the application for 11.07 writ of Habeas Corpus has been received and presented to the Court."

Subsequently on MARCH 10, 2015 applicant was in receipt of a SECOND White Post Card from the clerk's office on MARCH 10, 2014 also dated FEBRUARY 23, 2015 Note; the first NOTICE was not post marked in any manner by U.S. Postal Service); the SECOND Notice is Post marked) stating: "ON this day, the supplemental clerk's record, in response to the order issued by this

*3 .... Court, has been received and presented to the Court?"

Note; This post card bears the trial court number as [98-F-0331202] and writ number as [WR-13,573-09].

• APPLICANI'S ROUURY *

The State refused to [RESPOND] to applicant's initial application which appears to rely on authorities that are clearly dispositive of the TWO [2] issues presented by the applicant namely EXPARTE BARFIELD 697 S.W.2d 420 [Tex.Cr.App. 1985] Controlling as to the first issue), and HORDES V. STATE 256 S.W.2d 285 [Tex.Cr.App. 2008] appears to be [d]ispositive of the SECOND issue raised in the application.

Your applicant finds himself 'Perplexed' and subjected to 'Consternation' due to his enability to see, observe, or rélanny of the records (forwarded to this court from Bowie County).

Your applicant DOES NOT KNOW what records were sent, or whether or not he need to reply, or [R]espond to the records sent in by the State.

IT DOES NOT APPER UNDER 'ANY' CIRCUMSTANCES, that the State would RECOMMEND THAT RELIEF SHOULD BE GRANTED, therefore applicant is at a lose.

WHEREFORE premises considered, applicant PRAY, this Honorable Court of Criminal appeals will make a determination as to whether or not applicant needs to make a reply, as to any adverse contentions placed before this court by the state.

Applicant places his 'trust' in the jurisprudence of these 'Key Makers' to make a just decision and to grant applicant any and all relief that [He] is so justly due according to clearly established Federal Law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States of America.

Respectfully Submitted:

*4 I MAURICE MITCHELL, do, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of APPLICANT'S NOTICE TO THIS COURT, has been served upon the clerk of the TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPLIES, by depositing same in the United States mail postage pre-paid on this 16th day of MARCH 2015 addressed as follows; Hon; Abel Acosta, Clerk Texas Court of Criminal appeals P. O. Box 12308. Capital station

Austin, Texas 78711

cc/files skf.