Case Information

*1 9/4/15 FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS 12th Court of Appeals District TO: COURT OF APPEALS 20th RE: AS CATHY S. LUSK CENTRO 712915 - APPEAL ADVANEY

ENCLOSED ARCEADLES GFCETERS TO YOU, 241 ST JUO. DIST, SHITH CO. SMERRIE CONCERN- 1146 MY ATTERAPT'S 70 GEN AN ADVANEY &; BE READY FOR APPEAL, WHICH IS GOULS TO IEE DIFFICULT DUE TO THE JAILS PROCLIVITIES!

*2 MicroEL B. Tominsoi 12-15-00173C9/2411-09504 B.C. UNIT 1992223

PROV SPUR 591 AMARALy; TEX 791079606 (1) LOIS ROGERS- DIST CLERK, SMITHCO 4 (2) CATNY LUSK-CLEAK, 12TH COURT OF APPERAS; TYLER

RE: REASE HEXP! MENTALY DISABLED; LIFETABALL CONVICITON-APPEAL; #241-09504! DEMIN OF DUE PROCESS JUEGAL # MALIOOUS; APPORT COUNSEL IMMEDIATELY! I CANNOT DOIT MYSELF! NEEO ALI STAMP FIIED PROSE COURT DOCUMENTS # RERATTERS RECORD, ETC! PLEASE EXPEDITE! ALI MY RECORDS (PRO-SE) JUEGALD CONSISCATED E Co. JAIL. INDISENT. COURT HASNO ACCENTABILITY!

DEAR I AM DISABLED; VICTIM OF AGERAVATED MALICULUS VIVLENT ASSAUCTIDMY HEAD# ERANNON 27MANI(EADUPAI HEMATOMA) RESULTING IN TRAMMATIC HEALS # ERAIN SHERAPY E E TMC. I WAE ASSAUTED BY BUYCCHY, EX-HUSPANDS OF AKEGED VICTIM STAKE B. I AM STUL RECOVERING FROM INITIAL ASSAULT # SUBSEQUENT SEVERAL ASSAULTS TO MY HEAD BY ALEGED VICTIM, # UNTIL THEY LIVERE JUE GALLY CONFISCATED ECUNITY JAIL, HADETMC E.R. TRIAGE RECORDS OF ALI THESE! I NEED ALI THE DOCUMENTS RETURNED # ONEE-WREENT! INCLUDING LETTERS TO THE COURT, IMPORTANT ADDRESSES # AF# S; FAMILY, WITNESSES, FRANCIS, COURT, LICGAL, PERSCHIAL, ETC.. ESPECIALLY URGENTARE ALI THE STAMPEFIIED (SO)COPIES OFMOTIONS I SUMMATED, TO PROVE SUPPRESER EXIDENCE, DENIED SHERPENS FOR MULGEICAL REASON, DENIAL OF DEFENSE FORENSE POKHOULOIDS # VARIOUS SCIENTIFIC EVISENEE; MANY OTHER MOTIONS (EXCULPATURY) E ISSUE, MOTIONS FOR ETMONENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT # PRESCRIPTIONS STACIES PRICES, DENIED MEANINGFUL ACCESS TO PROPER LAW LIBRARY, ETC.; IE. -EITIRE PRO-SE FILE; ILLEGAL #MALICIOUS!!

• GRANIDS FOR NEWT TRIAL: (COURT PROSECUTION) -Counts #WITHHEQ-DENIED EVIDENCE # DIMATESTING; COURT MI SDIREATED THE JURY; ACCUSED WAS DENIED (AUTY) COUNSEL-EVEN'STAND-TEY' REFUSED FUNDAMENT

*3 TAL CRUCIAL HELP; SEVERAL CRUCIAL MATERIAL DEFENSE WITNESSES PREVENTED FROM TESTIFYING BY FACE, FRALG TICKERY YOU EVIDENCE TENDING TO ESTABLISH THE MADGENSE OF AECUSED INTENTIONALY WITHINED PREVENTING ITS PRODUCTION O TRIAL (RULE 21.3c); THE VERDICT IS CONTRARY TO THE LAW &; EVIDENCE (RULE 21.3 b) ILLEGAL SEARCH &; SEIZURE (ALLEGED VICTIM NOT ON LEXSE-CONTRACT); JUDGE DEVIEDS REASONABLE BOYS (REDUCTION) &; LAW (IRRARY PROSECUTORS FASE ACO- SATION OF GY CONVITION- NO CONVICTION!; JUDGE RUSIED ME (ACCUSED) DU- RING SELECTION OF TURY, I (AECUSED) HAVE BRAIN DAMAGE-DENIED ADEQUATE (ANY) PROPERT PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL EMENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT &; PRESCRIPTION MEDI- CATION RESARBless of MANY SUPPLIED STAMP-FILED MUTTION. COURT WITH- HELD EXCULPA TERYEVIDENCE, COURT ISMORED-DENIED ALMOST SO CRUCIAL MOTIONS! PROSECUTUR TULSTED FAVIRABLE FACTS TL MAKE ME LOCK GUILTY! PHYSICIANS' EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE/RESTIMENT! PROSECUTION MINIMIZED AN VIOLENT TRAMMATIC HEAS &; PERMU SURGERY &; ATTECTED MENTAL HEALTH &; SUBSE- PUENT ASSAULTTS! PRO SECUTION CALLEDME ALIAR W ROUT OF TURY DURING TRIAL! J. 15 GE AS PROSECUTION! NO DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF DENIED MOTIONS: ARBITRARY!! DENTAL OF EX-PARTE HEARINGS, ABH SIVE DISCRETION OF COURT. THE VERDICT WAS DECIDED BY LOT GRINAN MANUER OTHER THAN FAIR EXPRESSION OF OTHER BY JURUAS (RULE 21.3c). DIGNITY OF U.S. EW'T WALL NET PERMIT CONVICTION OF ANY PERSON ON TAHITED TEST- MOTION TO ABDLKE FACTS ON RECORD!

THIS FACILITY DEMING AN EVIDEENLY LEGAL SUFICISE LAW LIRRARY!

SINCEREY!

*4

23MM

MICHAEL IS: TRANASON

*5 CASENG: 12-15-0017358 CALSE NO: 241-0450-14 UN THE 241157DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUN tV. TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS

MICHAEL G. JOHNSON-KAZAHATIAN DEPENDANT-ACCUSED TOCJ# 1991023 D O B. O 4 APR 59

ORDER: APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

CAME ON THIS DAY FOR CONSIDERATION, THE DEPENDANTS REGUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL TO ASSIST HIM IN RE SOLVING PENDING CHARGES IN THE Above styLeS CASE PRINSUANT TO TEXAS CODE CRIM, PROC. ART [JOS]. THE COURT has REVIEWED THE DEPENDAN'S DeCLARATION IN SUPPORT OF RIGHT TO REPRESENTATION BY COUNSEL IN THIS MATTER AND IF IS HERE BY:

ORDERED THAT AN ATORNEY SHALL BE APPOINTED TO REPRESENT DEPENDANT TO TEXAS CODE CRIM, PROC. ART [JOS]. ACCORDINGLY, THE FILLUING, ITTERNEY IS HERE BY AROINTEDAND INSTRUCTED TO CATRACT HIS/HEP CLIENT REGARDING THIS MATTER:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT A COPY OF THIS ORDER SHALL BE SELIT TO THE DEPENDANT BY THE CERKELTthis COURT.

THAGE PRESIDING

*6 COPY

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE FURESOUND MOTION FOR COURT APPRINTED COUNSEL, EXHIBIT 1, AND ORDER HAVE BEEN MAILED, CERTIFIED MAIL, RETHAN RECEIVT RESPUESTED, HAND DEEVERED TO CONSE-CKE-CURTOR FOR THE STATE AT DAY OF $2015$

IN THIS THE DAY OF

DEPENDANT, PRO-SE MUTHEL 13, JEINSCHKAZAUTIAN TOCT NO. OLY92023 TOCT UNIT BILL CIEMENTS 9601 SPAR 591 AMARILU, TX 79107-9606