Appellant, Ras Thompson, attempts to appeal an order dismissing the lawsuit he filed against appellees, William Clayton Trotter, et al. The order was signed on June 9, 2015. Appellant filed his notice of appeal with this court on July 15, 2015. We dismiss

the appeal because appellant failed to comply with the c ourt’s order requiring a written explanation for his late notice of appeal. T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(c).

Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on July 9, 2015. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.1. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on July 15, 2015, but did not file a motion requesting *2 an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3, the court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if, within 15 days after the deadline expires, the appellant files the notice of appeal along with a motion requesting an extension that reasonably explains the need for an extension. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3 & 10.5(b). Although a motion for extension is implied when the appellant tenders a notice of appeal within 15 days after the notice deadline, it is still necessary for the appellant to reasonably explain the need for an extension. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997); Jones v. City of Houston , 976 S.W.2d 676, 677 (Tex. 1998).

Because appellant filed a notice of appeal within 15 days after the deadline, a motion for extension was implied. However, the court ordered appellant to file a written response by August 14, 2015 explaining why the notice of appeal was filed late. The court also informed appellant that the failure to comply with the c ourt’s directive would result in dismissal of the appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3. Although appellant has filed a brief, appellant did not respond to the c ourt’s directive for a written explanation.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c) because appellant failed to comply with a court order requiring a response within a specified time. Of course, appellant has 15 days to file a motion for rehearing wherein he may comply with the c ourt’s previous directive for an explanation. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 49.1.

Per Curiam

2