PER CURIAM ORDER Appellant’s counsel filed a combined brief in the above-styled and numbered cases.

However, counsel did not identify any issues for appeal in cause numbers 12-14-00314-CR, 12- 14-00315-CR and 12-14-00317-CR. Nor did counsel inform this court that the appeal in those cause numbers is frivolous. Therefore, the appeal in those three cause numbers has not been properly presented to the court. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.9(b). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Appellant’s counsel file an amended brief in cause numbers 12-14-00314-CR, 12-14-00315-CR and 12-14-00317-CR on or before September 1, 2015.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amended brief should identify and address the merits of all arguable issues on appeal or, alternatively, should comply with the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct, 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); and Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). *2 WITNESS the Honorable James T. Worthen, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, 12 th Court of Appeals District of Texas, at Tyler.

GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF SAID COURT , at my office this the 12th day of August 2015, A.D.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK 12 TH COURT OF APPEALS By: ________________________________ Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk