History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dr. Amber Brooks, D.C. v. Texas Medical Board And, in Their Official Capacities Only, Mari Robinson, Executive Director Irvin Zeitler, Jr., D.O., Chair of the Disciplinary Panel And Paulette Southard, Member of the Disciplinary Panel
03-14-00239-CV
| Tex. App. | Mar 3, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*0 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/27/2015 11:23:46 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk NO. 03-14-00239-CV THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 2/27/2015 11:23:46 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE 03-14-00239-CV AUSTIN, TEXAS *1 ACCEPTED [4311837] CLERK

____________________________________________________

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

____________________________________________________

DR. AMBER BROOKS, D.C.,

Appellant,

v.

TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD, et al.,

Appellees.

____________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 353rd Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas

The honorable Timothy Sulak presiding

Cause No. D-1-GN-13-003617

____________________________________________________

APPELLEES’ SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

___________________________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

Appellees; the Texas Medical Board and, in their official capacities only, Mari

Robinson (Executive Director), Irvin E. Zeitler, Jr., D.O., and Paulette Southard

(hereinafter collectively referred to as the “TMB”) respectfully submit the following

supplemental brief in the captioned appeal.

STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

The TMB conditionally requested oral argument on the first page of its

original brief. The TMB stated in its brief that it does not believe oral argument is

necessary. The TMB wises to clarify that it does reserve the right to participate in

oral argument should it be granted.

RESPONSE TO APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF

The TMB submits this supplemental brief for the purpose of clarifying two

points raised in the reply brief filed by Appellant, Amber Brooks (“Brooks”) on

August 11, 2014.

On page 19 of her reply brief, Brooks states that the TMB referred to Tex.

Gov’t Code § 2001.052 in arguing that cease and desist proceedings are not subject

to the Texas Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) in the first place. See the

TMB’s brief at 14. The TMB intended to refer to Tex. Gov’t Code § 2001.054, not

.052. (The TMB clearly referred to and discussed § 2001.054 on the same page of

its brief to which Brooks refers).

On page 21 of her reply brief, Brooks states that the TMB cited Tex. Occ.

Code § 151.504(d) in support of its contention that the Veterinary Board’s statute

specifically provides that its cease and desist proceedings are subject to the APA.

See the TMB’s brief at 16. The TMB intended to refer to Veterinary Board rule

575.40(d)(2), which specifically provides that, in cease and desist proceedings, “the

Board may refer the complaint and investigative file to the State Office of

Administrative Hearings for a contested case proceeding (thus subjecting Veterinary

Board cease and desist proceedings to APA procedures).” 22 Tex. Admin. Code §

575.40(d)(2). Compare TMB Rule 187.83(e), outlining detailed procedures for

cease and desist proceedings before a TMB panel (and not the contested case

procedures under the APA). 22 Tex. Admin. Code § 187.83(e).

Dated: February 27, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

KEN PAXTON

Attorney General of Texas

CHARLES E. ROY

First Assistant Attorney General

JAMES E. DAVIS

Deputy Attorney General for Civil Litigation

DAVID A. TALBOT, JR.

Division Chief, Administrative Law

Division

/s/ Ted A. Ross

Ted A. Ross

Assistant Attorney General

State Bar No. 24008890

O FFICE OF THE T EXAS A TTORNEY G ENERAL

A DMINISTRATIVE L AW D IVISION

P. O. Box 12548

Austin, Texas 78711-2548

Telephone: (512) 475-4191

Facsimile: (512) 320-0167

Email: ted.ross@texasattorneygeneral.gov

Attorneys for Appellees Texas Medical

Board, et al.

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

I hereby certify compliance with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9 and

that there are 340 words in this document. Microsoft Word was used to prepare this

filing and calculate the number of words in it.

/s/ Ted A. Ross

Ted A. Ross

Assistant Attorney General

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, in compliance with Rule 9.5 of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document

has been served on the following on this the 27 th day of February 2015:

Robert D. Simpson, Of Counsel Via: Electronic Service and email

Andre D’Souza

Leichter Law Firm, PC

1602 E. 7th Street

Austin, Texas 78702

Email: robert@leichterlaw.com

andre@leichterlaw.com

/s/ Ted A. Ross

Ted A. Ross

Assistant Attorney General

Case Details

Case Name: Dr. Amber Brooks, D.C. v. Texas Medical Board And, in Their Official Capacities Only, Mari Robinson, Executive Director Irvin Zeitler, Jr., D.O., Chair of the Disciplinary Panel And Paulette Southard, Member of the Disciplinary Panel
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Mar 3, 2015
Docket Number: 03-14-00239-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.