History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cedrick Bernard Lewis v. State
12-14-00201-CR
Tex. App.
Aug 4, 2015
Check Treatment

*0 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 8/4/2015 4:28:09 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk *1 ACCEPTED 12-14-00201-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 8/4/2015 4:28:09 PM CATHY LUSK CLERK

P H I L IP C. F L E T C H ER A T T O R N EY AT L AW 8 00 N O R TH M A L L A RD P A L E S T I N E, T E X AS 7 5 8 01 T E L E P H O NE ( 9 0 3) 7 31 - 4 4 40 F A C S I M I LE ( 9 0 3) 7 3 1 - 4 4 74

A u g u st 4, 2 0 15

M r s. C a t hy L u sk

T w e l f th C o u rt of A p p e a ls

1 5 17 W e st F r o nt S t r e e t, S u i te 3 54

T y l e r, T e x as 7 5 7 02

R e: C e d r i ck L e w is v. T he S t a te of T e x a s, A p p e al N o. 1 2 - 1 4 - 0 0 2 0 1 - CR

D e ar M r s. L u s k:

In a c c o r d a n ce w i th R u le 4 8 . 4 ,1 c e r t i fy t h at on A u g u st 4, 2 0 1 5, I s e nt a c o py of t h is C o u r t 's O p i n i on to C e d r i ck L e w is at h is l a st k n o wn a d d r e s s. T h at l e t t er a l so a d v i s ed C e d r i ck L e w is of h is r i g ht to p u r s ue a P e t i t i on f or D i s c r e t i o n a ry R e v i ew a c c o r d i ng to T e x as

R u le of A p p e l l a te P r o c e d u re 6 8. T he l e t t er a nd o p i n i on w e re m a i l ed u s i ng c e r t i f i ed m a i l,

r e t u rn r e c e i pt r e q u e s t e d.

If y ou h a ve a ny q u e s t i o n s, p l e a se f e el f r ee to c o n t a ct m e.

S i n c e r e l y,

P h i l ip C. F l e t c h er P C F : j sh

E n c l o s u re

P H I L IP C. F L E T C H ER A T T O R N EY AT L AW 8 O0 N O R TH r v l A L X A RO P A L E S T I N E, T E X AS 7 5 8 01
T E L E P H O NE ( 9 0 3) 7 3 1 - 4 4 40 F A C S I M I LE ( 9 0 3) 7 31 - 4 4 74

A u g u st 4, 2 0 15

CMRRR NO. 7002 2410 0004 1477 6786

M r. C e d r i ck L e w is

T D CJ N o. 1 9 3 8 6 72

A l l r ed U n it

2 1 01 FM 3 69 N

I o wa P a r k, T e x as 7 6 3 67

R e: C e d r i ck L e w is v. T he S t a te of T e x as

A p p e al N u m b e r: T r i al N u m b e r: 3 1 1 89 1 2 - 1 4 - 0 0 2 0 1 - CR

D e a r. M r. L e w i s:

I r e c e i v ed t he o p i n i on f r om t he T w e l f th C o u rt of A p p e a l s. E n c l o s ed is a c o py of t h at o p i n i on f r om t h at c o u r t. T he C o u rt of A p p e a ls r u l ed a g a i n st y ou in t h at t h ey f o u nd t h at t he

c o u rt d id n ot e x e rt u n d ue i n f l u e n ce on t he h o l d o ut j u r or in m a k i ng t he s t a t e m e nt it d i d.

T he n e xt l e v el to y o ur a p p e al w o u ld be to t he C o u rt of C r i m i n al A p p e a ls in A u s t i n, T e x a s. T he C o u rt of C r i m i n al A p p e a ls is n ot r e q u i r ed to h e ar a p p e a l s, u n l i ke t he T w e l f th

C o u rt of A p p e a l s. T he C o u rt of C r i m i n al A p p e a ls h as d i s c r e t i o n a ry r e v i ew a u t h o r i ty in

c r i m i n al c a s e s. S h o u ld y ou d e c i de to p r o c e ed to t he n e xt l e v el of a p p e al in y o ur c a s e,

t h e r e f o r e, y ou w o u ld n e ed to f i le a P e t i t i on f or D i s c r e t i o n a ry R e v i ew ( P D R) w i t h in t h i r ty

d a ys of t he d a te of t he o p i n i on of t he T w e l f th C o u rt of A p p e a ls p u r s u a nt to T e x as R u le of

A p p e l l a te P r o c e d u re 6 8. T he d a te of t he o p i n i on w as J u ly 2 2, 2 0 1 5, so a P DR w o u ld be

d ue to be f i l ed w i th t he T w e l f th C o u rt of A p p e a ls no l a t er t h an t h i r ty ( 3 0) d a ys f r om t h is d a t e. T he T w e l f th C o u rt of A p p e a ls w o u ld f o r w a rd a ny P DR

to t he C o u rt of C r i m i n al A p p e a l s. T he a d d r e ss to t he T w e t f th C o u rt of A p p e a ls is 1 5 17 W e st F r o nt S t r e e t, S u i te

3 5 4, T y l e r, T e x as 7 5 7 0 2. I do n ot f e el t h at g r o u n ds e x i st j u s t i f y i ng t he f i l i ng of a P DR in

y o ur c a s e, b e c a u se of t he r e a s o ns we h a ve d i s c u s s e d, a nd w h i le I d i s a g r ee w i th t he

C o u r t 's r u l i n g, t h ey c o n s i d e r ed d e c i s i o n. S h o u ld y ou f e el o t h e n w i s e, it w o u ld be up to y ou to d r a ft a nd f i le t he P DR t i m e ly m a n n e r. t he e v i d e n ce in a t h o r o u gh m a n n er in r e a c h i ng t h e ir

in a If y ou h a ve a ny q u e s t i o n s, p l e a se do n ot h e s i t a te to c o n t a ct my office. S i n c e r e l y,

P h i l ip C. F l e t c h er P C F : j sh E n c l o s u re

Case Details

Case Name: Cedrick Bernard Lewis v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Aug 4, 2015
Docket Number: 12-14-00201-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.