Burton Kahn v. Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc., 04-14-00569-CV

Burton Kahn v. Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc.

04-14-00569-CV

| Tex. App. | Feb 5, 2015

Check Treatment

Case Information

*0 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 02/5/2015 7:19:52 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk

*1 ACCEPTED 04-14-00569-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2/5/2015 7:19:52 AM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK 04 -14 -00569- CV 3Jn ~be C!Court <!&f §ppeals jf or ~be jf ourtb 71Bistritt <!&f ~exas ~an §ntonio ~exas BURTON KAHN APPELLANT V. HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY INC. APPELLEE. On Appeal From The 37th Judicial District Court Of Bexar County, Texas Trial Court, No. 2013-CI -18355 Hon. Michael Mery, Judge Presiding APPELLANTS BRIEF Burton Kahn pro se 1706 Alpine Circle San Antonio, TX 78248 210-408-9199 glentrail@yahoo.com

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED *2

IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL Appellant certifies that the following is a complete list of the parties, attorneys and any other person who has any interest in the outcome of this lawsuit:

Attorneys for Appellants:

Burton Kahn Pro-se

1 706 Alpine Circle San Antonio, TX 78248 Tel (210) 408-9199 glentrail@yahoo. corn

Attorneys for Appellees: Haynes and Boone LLP Lisa Barkley 112 E. Pecan St. Suite 1200 San Antonio, TX 78205 - 1524 Tel (210) 978-7427 Fax (210) 0427 Lisa.Barkley@ haynesboone.com Haynes & Boone, LLP Werner A. Powers Natalie DuBose 2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700 Dallas, Texas 7 5 219 Tel (214) 651-5487 Fax (214) 200-0468 Werner.Powers@hayneshoone.com

Real Party of Interest Puerto Verde Ltd. (Bahamian) For Appellee

Trial Judge: Hon. Michael E. Mery 3 7 th Judicial District Court Bexar County, Texas

"lii *3 Previous Attorney Appellant Appellant has represented himself pro se since December 14, 2013. His previous counsel was: L. Terry George died on June 29, 2014. Fort Worth, Texas Jay R. Petterson Jay R. Petterson, Attorney at Law, PLLC 12274 12274 Bandera Road, Suite 210 Helotes, Texas 78023 Kathleen A. Cassidy Goodman Law Office of Kathleen Cassidy Goodman 12274 Bandera Road, Suite 210 Helotes, Texas 78023 Richard H. Sommer 8610 N. New Braunfels Ave., Suite 309 San Antonio, Texas 78217 Robert W. Wachsmuth Zachary J. F anucci Robert Wachsmuth & Associates 9311 San Pedro, Suite 707 San Antonio, Texas 78216

111 *4 RELATED LITIGATION The following litigation matters are related to this appeal: I. APPEALS IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS:

1. Appeal No. 04-14-00258-CV In re a Purported Lien or Claim Against Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. The Court dismissed this appeal on August 20, 2014.

2. Appeal No. 04-14-00012-CV and Texas Supreme Court Case 14- 0821. Burton Kahn v. Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. The Court dismissed this appeal on July 16, 2014 and denied Kahn's motion for en bane consideration on September 25, 2014. Burton Kahn filed his Petition for Review to the Texas Supreme Court on December 10, 2014. Helvetia Asset Recovery. Rnc. do not respond and on January 13, 2015 the case was forwarded to the court.

Appeal No. 04-14-00319-CV Burton Kahn v. Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. The Court dismissed this appeal on July 9, 2014.

3. Appeal No. 04-14-00569-CV Burton Kahn v. Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. This appeal is subject of this brief.

II. BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS, PENDING:

1. In re: Burton M. Kahn, Debtor, Case No. 14-50980, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division.

2. In re: Burton M. Kahn, Debtor, Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. v.

Burton Al. Kahn,

Adversary Proceeding Case No. 14-5052, United

UJ

*5 llL PENDING BEXAR COUNTY DISTRICT COURT LITIGATION: States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division.

PENDING BEXAR COUNTY LITIGATION 1. Burton Kahn v. Joabert Development Company and John Ripley, Cause No. 2013-CI-17012, 37th Judicial District, Bexar County, Texas. 2. I Burton Kahn v. Robert Ripley, et al., Cause No. 2014-CI-3453, 225th Judicial District, Bexar County, Texas. (This action was severed from Cause No. 2013-Cl-l 8355 in May 2014.)

1¥ *6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page IDENTITY OF PARTIES ........ . .. .......... . .... ....... ............. ......... ....... ,,, ... .i RELATED LITIGATION .............................................................. .iii. TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................. vi

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........ . .. .............. .... ......... ......... ..... ........

vi STATEMENT OF THE CASE ................................................................ xii. STATEMENT REGARDNG ORAL ARGUMENTT .................. xiii STATEMENT REGARDNG JURISDICTION ........................... xiii RECORD REFERENCES ............ . .......... . .. .. .. ........ ..... ... ...... ......... xiv ISSUES PRESENTED ............................... . . . .. ......... . ... xv STA TEMENTOF FACTS ....................................................................................... 1

BACKGROUND ................................................................... 1 CLAIM OF OWNERSHIP ........................................................ 3 PLAINTIFF'S 'EXHIBIT 9 WIRING INSTRUCTIONS ................... 5 PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT 39 NORGANIZATIONAL KIT ................... 7

SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ............................................................. 9 ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES ............................................................... 9 ISSUE 1 THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY ALLOWING

APPELLATE REVIEW ................................................................................................ 5 COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL FROM THE FINAL JUDGMENT AND SANCTION ORDER DETERMINING THE OWNERSHIP OF THE SHARES OF

iv *7 I-IBL VE TIA. . .................................................................................................... 9 A. STATUTE REPRESENTATIVE PARTY ................ . .. . .. ............ 10 B. SUBJECT MATTER illRISDICTION .............................. . ... .. . 13 C. FULLY LITIGATED .......................................................... 14 CONCLUSION OF ISSUE 1 .................................................... 15

ISSUE 2 TI-IE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY DENYING APPELLANT'S JNOV BECAUSE TI-IE JURY'S ANSWERS WERE NOT BASED ON TI-IE EVIDENCE PRESENTED ................................................ 15

QUESTION 2 ...................................................................... 16 MISAPPROPIATION OFASSETS ......... . ... .. ... . .. ........................ 16 LOST PROFITS ............ . ... ........................ . .. ........................ 19 QUESTION 5 ......... . ... .. ...................... . .. . .. .................... . ... ... 21 QUESTION 7 ......... . ... .. ...................... . .. . .. .................... . ... ... 21 QUESTION 9 ...................................................................... 22 QUESTION 11 .......... . .. . .. ....................... . ... .. ........................ 22 QUESTION 14 .......... . .. .......................... . ... .......................... 23 CONCLUSION OF ISSUE2 ................................................ / ..... 23

\ ISSUE 3 TI-IE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY NOT ALLOWING ANY APPELLANT'S WITNESSES TO GIVE TESTIMONY DUE TO LACK OF DETAIL IN DISCLOSURE FILED 6 DAYS BEFORE TRIAL. .. . .......... . ...... 24

CONCLUSION OF ISSUE3 ....................................................... 26 \ ISSUE 4 TI-IE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY STRIKING DEFENDANTS' FIRST AMENDED ORIGINAL ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S

iv vu

*8 FIRST AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION RELIEF, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, VERIFIED DENIALS, TIIlRD PARTY CLAIMS, AND MOTION TO SHOW AUTI-IORITY ........... . ........ . ............. . .. ...... . .. ............. . ................ . .. ..... 26

CONCLUSION OF ISSUE 4 ....................................................... 28 ISSUE 5 THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY GRANTING APPELLEE' S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OR ALTERNATIVELY MOTION IN LIMINE AND SUSTAINING ALL APPELLEE' S ARE OBJECTIONS ..... ..................... ........... . .. ....... ..................... . ......... 28 CONCLUSION ............ ..................... ......................... ............. . ... 29 PRAYER' ................................................ . .. .......... ........... . .. ....... . ............ 29 VERIFICATION ........................................................................ 25 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ................................................. 30 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ............................................. . . . .. . ............. 30 VERIFICATION ......... ........................ ....................................... 31 APPENDIX .................................................................................................... 32

A. FINAL TIJDGMENT AND TIJR Y CHARGE

B. TEX. CIV. PRAC.

& REM. CODE §10.001(2) C. FIINACIAL RECORDS TABULATION

iv V111

*9 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES American Alternative Ins. Corp. v. Davis, 446 S.W.3d 41 (Tex.App.-Waco 2014) ................................................. 15 Avco Corp., Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Div. of Avco Corp. v. Interstate Southwest, Ltd., 251 S.W.3d 632, 662 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th] 2007, pet. denied) ............... 23 Avila v. St. Luke's Lutheran Hosp., 948 S.W.2d 841, 858 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, pet. denied) ......... ... ........ 12 Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation Dist., 925 S.W.2d 618, 629 (Tex. 1996) ........................................................ .11 Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976) ............................................................ 5, 19 Beaumont Bank, NA. v. Buller, 806 S.W.2d 223, 226 (Tex. 1991). ............ ..................... ... ............... 12,13 Bragg v. Edwards Aquifer Auth., 71 S.W.3d 729, 734 (Tex. 2002) .......................................................... 11 Brown v. Bank of Galveston, 963 S.W.2d 511, 513 (Tex.1998) .......................................................... 15 Cent. Ready Mix Concrete Co. v. Islas, 228 S.W.3d 649, 651 (Tex.2007) ........................................................ .16 City of Houston v. Williams, 353 S.W.3d 128, 133 (Tex. 2011). ............ ... ....... ........... ... ....... ............ 14 City of Keller v. Wilson, 168 S.W.3d 802, 827 (Tex.2005) ......................................................... 16 EX Parte S.d., 07-13-00168-cv (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1-15-2015) ......... ... ............... ... ........ 11 F.F.P. Operating Partners, L.P. v. Duenez, 237 S.W.3d 680, 683 (Tex. 2007) ... ... .................. ... ....... ........ ... ........... 11

lX *10 Gee v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 765 S.W.2d 394, 396 (Tex. 1989)~ ....................................................... 26 Goldstein v. Comm 'n for Lawyer Discipline, 109 S.W.3d 810 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2003, pet. denied) ....... .................. ........ 12 Helena Chemical Company v. Wilkins, 47 S.W.3d 486 (Tex. 2001) ... ... .......... ........ ... .......... ........ ... .......... ..... 20 Holt Atherton Indus., Inc. v. Heine, 835 S.W.2d 80, 84 (Tex. 1992) .......................................................... 20 John Masek Corp. v. Davis, 848 S.W.2d 170, 173 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, writ denied) ......................................................................... 16 Johnson Savage v. Fehrenkamp, 03-05-00060-cv (Tex.App.-Austin 4-2-2009) ......................................... 23 JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Professional Pharmacy II, 02-11-00373- CV (Tex.App.-Ft. Worth 12-31-2014) ................................ 20 LowvHenry, 221 S.W.3d 609, 617 (Tex.2007) ........................................................ 11 McCraw v. Maris, 828 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. 1992) ............................................................. 26 Nath V Texas Children's Hospital And Baylor College Of Medicine, 12-0620 (Tex. 8-29-2014) ............... ... .......... ........ ... ....... ........... ... ..... 11 Oscar Luis Lopez v. Madel. of Texas, 200 S.W.3d 854 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2006) ..................... ... ....... .............. .... 25 Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 813 331 (1979) ............................................................. 12

x *11 Powers v. M. L., 14-09-00814-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 10-26-2010) ............... . .. ... 22 Saf Nat'l Cas. v. State, 01-07-00123-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 4-17-2008) .......................... 10 Scurlock Oil Co. v. Smithwick, 724 S.W.2d 1 (Tex. 1986) ................................................. , .... 10,12,13,15 Smalley v. Smalley, 14-13-00717-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 6-12-2014) ........................ 14 State v. Shumate, 199 S.W.3d 279, 284 (Tex. 2006) ... . .. .................. . ......... . ....... . ........... . 11 Szczepanik v. First S. Trust Co., 883 S.W.2d 648, 649 (Tex. 1994) ...................................................... 20 Tanner v. Nationunde Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 289 S.W.3d 828, 830 (Tex.2009) .................. . .. .......... . ....... . .. ............. 16 Tex. Dep 't of Pub. Safety v. Petta, 44 S.W.3d 575, 579 (Tex. 2001) ... .. .......... . .. ....... . .......... . .. ....... . ...... . ... 14 Texas Instruments, Inc. v. Teletron Energy Mgmt., Inc., 877 S.W.2d 276, 279 (Tex. 1994) ... . .............................. . ....... . .. .......... 20 Texas TrunkR. Co. v. Jackson 22 S.W. 1030(Tex.1893) ................................................................. 20 Yarbrough's Dirt Pit, 65 S.W.3d at 216 ... . .. .................. . .. ....... . ............. 12

STATUTES AND RULES

TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE §10.001(2) ...... . .. .......... . ....... . .. .... 11,12

TEX. CIV,

PRAC. & REM CODE ANN§ 10:1004(d) ......... . .. ...................... 11 Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 41.004(a) (West 2008) ....................... 23

Xl

*12 TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN.§ 312.002, .003 (West 2013) ...... ... ... ... .. .. ... ...... 11

TEX.R.APP.P.

8l(b)(l) ...... ............................................................. 26 TEX.R. Civ. P. 194.2 ...................................................................... 24 TEX.R. Civ. P. 301 ........................................................................ 15 Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 13 ............ ... .......... ........ ... .......... 10

Xll *13 STATEMENT OF CASE Nature the case this is an appeal arising a jury trial with a judgment in

favor of Appellee.

3CR 185.

Course of proceeding.

On November 4, 2013 Supp.A 1 CRl Helvetia Asset Recovery Inc. ("Helvetia") filed the lawsuit giving rise to this appeal claiming Puerto Verde Ltd. was owner of the shares of Helvetia Supp.A 1 CRl

and Burton Kahn, ("Kahn") breached his fiduciary duty.

1 CR5. On December 9 2014 to December 11, 2013 the temporary injunction hearing was conducted and

the temporary injunction order was signed on December 18, 2014

Supp.A 1

CR108.

On March 3 and 4, 2014 a hearing was held for a Motion for Sanctions. Appellee' s First Motion For Sanctions Supp.B 2CR121. On April 1, 2014, Judge Tanner signed a Final Judgment and Order of Sanctions against Kahn and his attorney George, and found that Puerto Verde owned the stock in Helvetia., Supp.A 3CR 229. Judge Tanner stated that ownership of Helvetia was "a subject of a different type different of motion that is before me right now." Supp.B 2RR20

On May 12, 2014 Jury trial started and on June 11, 2014 Final Judgment signed by Judge Mery in favor of Appellee. 3R185.

Disposition Of The Case,

Kahn filed his notice of appeal on August 7,

2014.

4CR 444. X111 *14 STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION Appellant appeals final judgment of June 11, 2014. There is no dispute regarding the Fourth Court of Appeals have appellate jurisdiction over this matter .

. STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT Appellant does not believe that oral argument is necessary as the

arguments in brief hopefully will convince the Court to reverse the Judgment. XlV *15 RECORD REFERENCES The Reporter's Record will be cited as follows:

[Vol.] RR [page] Reporter's Record on October 3, 2014 Supp. A [Vol.] RR [page] Reporter's Record on January 14, 2014 Supp.A Excerpts [Vol.] RR [page] Reporter's Record on January 14, 2014 EXHIBITS Supp.A EXH 1 [page] Supp. B [Vol.] RR [page] Reporter's Record Case Number 202 CI 18394

Appeal Number 04-14-00357 CV on May 23, 2013 EXHIBITS Supp.B lEXH [page] The Clerk's Record will be cited as follows: [Vol.] BCR [page] Clerks submission on October 3, 2014 Supp. A [Vol.] ACR [page] Clerks submission on January 14, 2014 Supp. B [Vol.] CCR [page] Clerks submission Case Number 202 CI 183 94 Appeal Number 04-14-00357 CV on May 23, 2013 Supp. C [Vol.] DCR [page] Clerks submission on --------December 5,, 2014 Supp. D [Vol.] ECR [page] Clerks submission on February 4, 2015

xv *16 ISSUES PRESENTED ISSUE 1: The court abused its discretion by allowing Collateral Estoppel from the Final Judgment and Sanction Order determining the ownership of the shares. Issue 2: The court abused its discretion by denying appellant's JNOV because the jury's answers were not based on the evidence presented. Issue 3: The Court abused its discretion by not allowing any appellant's witnesses to give testimony due to lack of detail in disclosure filed 6 days before trial. Issue 4: The court abused its discretion by striking Defendants' First Amended Original Answer To Plaintiffs First Amended Original Petition And Application For Permanent Injunction Relief, Afiinnative Defenses, Verified Denials, Third Party Claims, And Motion To Show Authority. Issue 5. The court abused its discretion by sustaining Appellee' s Motion To Exclude Evidence Or Alternatively Motion In Limine.

iv XVl

*17 STATEMENTOF FACTS BACKGROUND Burton Kahn ("Kahn") ("Appellant") and John Ripley founded the Joabert Development Company ("Joabert") in 2006, to develop and sell housing lots in Northeast San Antonio. Appellant did all the work and John supplied the funds. Supp.A EX lRR 7. Agreement was that John Ripley was to supply the funds and the Appellant to do all of the day-to-day were which included purchasing of the property, bookkeeping and control of the funds, engineering design subdivision, coordination with government officials for approval and constructing the infrastructure and roadway according to the approved plans.

Appellant never got any compensation for the eight years that he worked and never took a salary. Supp.A 4RR44, Supp.A 3RR 114 John Ripley sold two shopping centers and the money went to a 1031 tax evasion exchange company in California and then the Exchange Company returned the funds (less commissions) to a Construction Corporation that Kahn owned 100%, in which Kahn spent the money working on the Joabert project. Supp.A 4RR 115

1 *18 John Ripley had another development named Key Largo, but it had of Lis

Pendens on it and could not be used for funding.

Supp.A 2RR 33 Kahn contacted an attorney Terry George ("George"), who did the paperwork for foreclosure and formed Texas Corporation named Helvetia. Supp.A 5RR4

John Ripley owed Falcon International Bank for a construction loan on Key Largo. Supp.A lRR 33 A Bahamian Corporation Maple Bush Holding Ltd ("Maple Bush") paid off the note Falcon International Bank and then foreclosed on Key Largo. Supp.A 1RR34

Robert Ripley, brother of John Ripley testified he owned Maple Bush Supp.A 2RR86 but his name is not on any of documents of Maple Bush Ltd, .

Supp.A 2RR103._

is a foreign Corporation not registered with the Secretary of

State.

Supp.A 2RR 86

Key Largo, the foreclosed property was sold to a newly formed holding corporation named Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. ("Helvetia"). 2RR88.

2

*19 Funds were earmarked to be used to develop a subdivision known as Royal

Crest (Joabert Property) in North east San Antonio Texas ..

Supp.A 1CR3, Supp.A 3RR 80.

Helvetia was a conduit to accumulate funds for Joabert. In Helvetia's

original petition funds were earmarked to go to Joabert ..

Supp.A lCR 3 The first phase of Joabert subdivision was within one month of completion, the partnership ended and lawsuits began (August 26, 2013). Supp.A 3RR38 CLAIM OF OWNERSHIP Robert Ripley, John's brother was not an owner of Joabert .. Supp.A

3RR97

wanted to take the Helvetia property for himself. On September 5, 2013 Robert Ripley sent Kahn an e-mail stating. Puerto Verde Ltd. a Bahamian Corporation not registered with the Secretary of State . Supp.A 3RR 86 was taking over.

Kahn realized that the shares of Helvetia had never been purchased and on September 7, 2013 Kahn paid to Helvetia $1000 for the shares Supp.A lEXH 346-348

On September 16, 2013 John Ripley and Robert Ripley went to Randolph Brooks Federal Credit Union and took approximately 50 pages of documents 3 *20 showing that they own the shares in Helvetia

Supp.A 3RR 81.

The Bank did not give them access.

On October 23, 2013, Puerto Verde Ltd. a Bahamian Corporation, claimed to be a 100% stockholder of Helvetia filed a lawsuit 2013-CI-17516, Supp.A

lEXH 309-355

in the style of"Action on Fraudulent Lien on Property." Robert Ripley swore that the documents in this suit were true, showing proof that Puerto Verde Ltd. is the owner of Helvetia. The documents presented Minutes Of The Organizational Meeting Of The Board Of Directors Of Helvetia Asset Recovery Inc. For A For-Profit Corporation dated August 17, 2007. ("Original Minutes"). Supp.A lEXH 329-334. Note on the top of each page there is a signature space for the custodian of records signed by Kenneth Moore ("Moore") the president designated in the original minutes. Moore testified at the injunction hearing that he was not the custodian of records Supp.A 4RR137 and only signed documents

once at closing on December 6, 2007

Supp.A 4RR 144 "Yes. That was the only

one time I did."

Supp.A 4RR144 A stock certificate shows on page Supp.A

lEXH 335

that Kenneth Moore's signed the document three times but only

positive of the lower 2.

Supp.A 4RR151 but on upper right Moore stated that's

not my signature

Supp.A 4RR141-142 Moore later was not sure Supp.A

4RR150-151

Moore also testified that he did not issue any stock nor did collect

4

*21 Moore also testified that he did not issue any stock nor did collect any money.

Supp.A 4RR136

The stock certificate was not the form with the Original Minutes. Robert Ripley testified that he made one up on Pagemaker program and faxed the form to his brother John Supp.A 4RR30. There are no fax identifications on the certificate. The stock certificate stated that the Corporation's name was Puerto Verde Inc. not Puerto Verde Ltd. The original motion in Case number 2013- CI - 18 394 Supp.B 1 CRl describes the above conflicts before the injunction hearing proved the allegations were correct.

Appellee was able to have Kahn's attorney a Jay Peterson sign a Rule 11 Agreement without Kahn's approval and eliminate the finding of Case 2013-CI- 183 94 for no apparent reason and waiving a jury trial. Kahn fired Peterson and complaining that Peterson was either bribed or coerced. Supp.A 4RR83 There was no statement or affidavit contradicting that accusation. This failure gives rise to an inference that the evidence is unfavorable to Appellee, Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976). One of the compensations that Peterson got was a finding in Final Judgment And Order Of Sanction "42. Helvetia has not sought sanctions against the associate attorney, Mr. Petterson. Although Mr. Petterson signed the offending pleading, Mr. Petterson attempted to rectify the error within

5

*22 ten days by entering into the Rule 11 Agreement."

Supp. B 3CR 249

Peterson was not named in the sanction motion or order.

Judge Pozza stated that the Rule 11 was unenforceable Supp.A Excerpts

1RR102

however she signed the set aside of case 2013-CI-18394 without any discussion or reason. Judge Tanner Notes at the sanction hearing sanctioned Kahn for the attempted withdrawal of the Rule 11 Agreement. Supp.A 2CR22

PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT 9 WRING INSTRUCTIONS On August 21, 2007 the Title Company sent Kahn an email wiring instructions for the $1.2 million money trail exchange. Supp.B lEXH 30 Robert Ripley took this document and crossed out sender and in his own handwriting that stated "Please transfer 1.2 million USD to my escrow agent as outlined in these instructions. The funds will be used to capitalize a Texas holding (-hold) co. and in return Puerto Verde will receive 1000 shares. " This document was not given to anybody. Robert Ripley testified that Scott Morrison ("Morrison") was the trust officer for the Bahamian bank Supp.A 2RR 14 and Morrison asked about

ownership on October 22, 2013.

Supp.A lEXH 39 and Robert Ripley didn't know

of it when he asked Kahn in Email dated February 18, 2014

Supp.A 1EXH61. These instructions were never sent to Morrison but Morrison sent the transfer funds. Supp. A 1 EXH 36

6

*23 Robert Ripley testified that the funds for the transfer came from the Ripley

family trust.

Supp.A 2RR 12 Robert Ripley also testified that the funds for the

transfer a computer company.

Supp.A 3RR 33 There are no Bank records of this transfer and there are no records of the title company that this document was in existence and was given or received. Robert Ripley testified that he owns both Puerto Verde Ltd and Maple Bush are not registered Texas 2RR86 Robert Ripley

does not have the original stock certificate .

Supp.A 3RR 88 nor the receipt from the Title Company nor the minutes of the original meeting, that he claimed in his affidavits of case 2013-CI-17516 and testimony previously cited above.

PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT 39 ORGANIZTION KIT In order to get the minutes timing and to correct the Inc. or Ltd. suffixes,, Appellee submitted to the court Exhibit 39 Supp.A lEXH 381, which he called a kit. Supp.A 2RR36-37Appellee claimed that was provided by Mr. Terry George.

Supp.A 2RR37

George testified that he never provided any copies to anyone but

Burt Kahn.

Supp.A 5RR31 George testified that Exhibit 39 was not his work.

Supp.A 5RR32

Exhibit 39 was comprised of transmittal and instruction letter,

Supp.A lEXH 384,

By laws Supp.A lEXH 391 and the initial meeting minutes

of August 8, 2,007.

Supp.A lEXH 418 The transmittal does not have any information on who has sent it nor a signature but it does state to review and call if

7 *24 there are any changes.

Supp.A lEXH 384,

The bylaws and initial minutes has George's signature on dated August 8, 2007 as if these documents are final. George testified that the signatures looked like his but the documents were not the documents George gave to Kahn. Supp.A 5RR31 The shares to be issued to

Puerto Verde, Inc. 1000. is written in pencil .

Supp.A lEXH 420 Also per August 8, 2007 minutes state that George resigned as Director on August 8, 2007. Robert testified that he received Exhibit 3 9 by courier in Canada but does not have any envelope that it came in. Supp.A 3RR25 Ripley testified that this Exhibit 3 9 was

specially flown in to San Antonio from Canada for the injunction hearing.

Supp.A

2RR39

The bylaws state in pencil the offices to be 6751 Walzem which is different from the minutes of August 17, 2007 which has George' s address. Supp.A EX 1RR231. Attorney George in his last words stated "39 0 I'm starting

to wonder about- about some criminal activity myself'

Supp.A 5RR 32

On December 9 2014 to December 11, 2013 the temporary injunction hearing was conducted and the temporary injunction order was signed on December 18, 2014 Supp.A 1 CRl 08. The order stated that a trial on the

merits is to be held on May 12, 2014.

1 CRll 7. On March 3 and 4, 2014 a

hearing was held for a Motion for Sanctions. Appellee' s First Motion For

Sanctions. Supp.B 2 CR121 On April 1, 2014, Judge Tanner signed a Final

8

*25 Judgment and Order of Sanctions against Kahn and his attorney George

Supp.B 3CR 229.

Appellee added in findings that the ownership Puerto Verde Ltd. even though Judge Tanner stated that ownership of Helvetia was "a subject of a different type of motion that is before me right now." Supp.B 2RR20 Judge

Pozza Ordered trial on the merits of the lawsuit is set for May 12, 2014.

Supp.A 1CR189

On May 12, 2014 Jury trial started and on June 11, 2014 Final Judgment signed by Judge Mery 4 CR185. SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT The trial court abused its discretion by allowing collateral estoppel from a sanction order that was being appealed de novo and prevented Appellant to present a defense and having a fair trial. The judgment for Appellee without any evidence from Appellee. Thus the trial should be reversed and remanded for a new trial.

ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES ISSUEl THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY ALLOWING COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL FROM THE FINAL JUDGMENT AND SANCTION ORDER DETERMINING THE OWNERSHIP OF THE SHARES OF HELVETIA.

The Appellee claimed in 2CR 263. Plaintiff Motion To Exclude Evidence For Alternative The Motion In Limine, that the Final Judgment And 9 *26 Sanction Order determined the ownership of the shares of Helvetia. Items 3,6,7,41

on

2CR266, 267,268 and 278 respectively. In the Supplemental Amended Temporary Injunction Order dated December 18, 2013 Judge Pozza ordered a trial on the merits of the lawsuit is set forth May 12, 2014. Supp.A 1 CRll 7

In Scurlock Oil Co. v. Smithwick, 724 S.W.2d I (Tex. 1986) states:

Therefore, we now adopt the rule of the

Restatement

(Second) of Judgments

§ 13, and hold that a judgment is final for the purposes of issue and claim preclusion "despite the taking of an appeal unless what is called an appeal actually consists of a trial de novo." We overrule Texas Trunk R. Co. v. Jackson and its progeny.

The sanction Order is on appeal and there are several issues that by law require a review consisting of a trial de novo: A.STATUTE REPRESENTNE PARTY Appellant claims that a party cannot be charged monetary sanction under TEX. CIV, PRAC. & REM CODE ANN§ 10:1004(d) \\hen the party is representative by

counsel. This is a legal issue and is to be reviewed de novo.

In Saf Nat'l Cas. v. State, 01-07-00123-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 4- 17-2008) states: 10 *27 This case requires us to construe the meaning of a statute. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, we employ a de novo standard of review. Bragg v.

Edwards Aquifer Auth.,

71 S.W.3d 729, 734 (Tex. 2002).

If

the language of a statute is not ambiguous, we must give effect to the plain meaning of its words unless doing so would lead to absurd results. See Barshop v. Medina

County Underground Water Conservation Dist.,

925 S.W.2d 618, 629 (Tex. 1996)

InEX Parte S.d., 07-13-00168-cv (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1-15-2015) states:

When construing statutes, we use a

de novo standard of review, and our primary objective is to ascertain and give effect to the Legislature's intent. TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 312.005 (West 2005). See F.F.P. Operating

Partners, L.P. v. Duenez,

237 S.W.3d 680, 683 (Tex. 2007). To discern that intent, we begin with the statute's words. TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 312.002, .003 (West 2013). See State v. Shumate, 199 S.W.3d 279, 284 (Tex.

2006).

In NATH v. TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSP IT AL AND BAYLOR COLLEGE OF

MEDICINE,

12-0620 (Tex. 8-29-2014) states: "However, Chapter 10 provides that a claim that lacks a legal or factual basis - without more - is sanctionable. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE§ 10.001 ~see also

Low,

221 S.W.3d at 617. Legally, the claim must be warranted by existing law or a nonfrivolous argument to change existing law. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 10.001 (2). But Chapter 10 expressly prohibits monetary sanctions against a represented party based on the legal

contentions in a pleading.

Id. § 10.004(d) ("The court

11

*28 may not award monetary sanctions again' st a represented party for a violation of Section 10.001(2). "). Accordingly, the trial court could not have properly awarded sanctions against Nath for groundless legal contentions in his tortuous interference claim."

In Goldstein v. Comm'nfor Lawyer Discipline, 109 S.W.3d 810 (Tex.App.- Dallas 2003, pet. denied) stated: "A trial court has broad discretion in determining whether to allow a plaintiff to use collateral estoppel offensively. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S.

322, 813 331 (1979);

Smithwick,

724 S.W.2d 1, 7 (Tex. 1986) (citing Parklane

Hosiery

with approval).

A trial court abuses its discretion only when its action is arbitrary and unreasonable,without reference to guiding rules or principles. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. Buller, 806 S.W.2d 223 , 226 (Tex. 1991). In determining whether to apply collateral estoppel

offensively, the trial court must consider the

Parklane

Hosiery

factors. See ParklaneHosiery Co., 439 U.S. at

329-30;

Yarbrough's Dirt Pit, 65 S.W.3d at 216.The first factor is whether application of the doctrine will tend to increase litigation by allowing a plaintiff to "wait and see" before filing suit instead of joining in the prior litigation. See Parklane Hosiery, 439 U.S. at 329-330;

Buller,

806 S.W.2d 223 , 226 (Tex. 1991).

In Plaintiffs first amended motion for sanctions , Plaintiff states that George

is also a representative party.

Supp.B 2 CR1359 The trial court acted

unreasonable and without reference to guiding rules or principles when

it did not

consider that the statute that monetary sanction under TEX. CIV, PRAC.

& REM CODE ANN § 10 :1004( d) \Wen the party is representative by counsel is a legal issue and is to be reviewed de novo by Appellate court and that collateral estoppel is should not allowed under In Scurlock Oil Co, supra.

B. SURJECTMATTERJURISDICTION

In the order of April 1, 2014 there are claims that Appellee owns the shares of Helvetia in the dialog of the Order. These notations are the basis of Appellee' s claim of ownership. During the sanction hearing(" SH") on March 3-4, 2014,, Kahn requested a ruling on the foreign corporation issue but did not get one. Kahn also stated" the issue in this particular case is who owns the stock along the company" . The court replied, "well that's a subject of a different type of motion that is before me right now is certainly a welcome to urge that to some court when

13 *30 you file a proper motion." Thus the court declared that the ownership of the stock

was not in her subject matter jurisdiction.

Supp.B 2RR20 In Smalley v. Smalley, 14-13-00717-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 6-12-2014) stated:

'Whether a trial court has subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law we review de novo. City of Houston v.

Williams,

353 S.W.3d 128, 133 (Tex. 2011).

The trial court acted unreasonable and without reference to guiding rules or principles when it did not consider that subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law that is reviewed de novo .

C. FULLY LITIGATED The Sanction trial Judge Tanner declared that the issue of ownership was not in her jurisdiction and did not litigate the ownership issue. Therefore collateral estoppel cannot be allowed based on Final Judgment And Sanction Order because facts sought to be litigated ( Ownership of the shares of Helvetia) were NOT were fully and fairly litigated in the Sanction hearing as required by Tex. Dep't of Pub.

Safety v. Petta,

44 S.W.3d 575, 579 (Tex. 2001).

The trial judge allowance of collateral estoppel without fully litigated on the issue of ownership of the shares of Helvetia was arbitrary and unreasonable, without reference to guiding rules or principles.

14 *31 CONCLUSION OF ISSUE 1 The findings found in the Final Judgment And Sanction Order dated April 1,

2014 should not allowed to be collateral estoppel based on

Scurlock Oil Co. v.

Smithwick,

supra and statutes. Based on the above this Honorable. Court of Appeals should reverse judgment of June 11, 2014 and remand for new jury trial.

ISSUE 2 THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY DENYING APPELLANT'S JNOV BECAUSE THE JURY'S ANSWERS WERE NOT BASED ON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED. The court should grant a motion for new trial because the jury's answers are not based on the evidence presented. Testimony was from Appellant Burton Kahn~ representing Appellee was Mary Guzman, Adam Smith, builder-contractor who purchased lots from Helvetia~ and Amanda Tidmore a title person who guarantee

title for the sales purchase of the lots at Helvetia.

In American Alternative Ins. Corp. v. Davis, 446 S.W.3d 41 (Tex.App.- Waco 2014) states: A trial court may disregard a jury's verdict and render a JNOV ifthere is no evidence to support the jury's findings or if a directed verdict would have been proper. Brown v. Bank of Galveston, 963 S.W.2d 511, 513 (Tex.1998)~ see TEX.R. Civ. P. 301. We review the trial

15

*32 court's ruling on a motion for JNOV under a legal

sufficiency standard.

See Tanner v. Nationunde Mut. Fire

Ins. Co.,

289 S.W.3d 828, 830 (Tex.2009). We "credit evidence favoring the jury verdict if reasonable jurors could, and disregard contrary evidence unless reasonable jurors could not." Cent. Ready Mix Concrete Co. v. Islas, 228 S.W.3d 649, 651 (Tex.2007). We must uphold the jury's finding if more than a scintilla of competent evidence supports it. Tanner, 289 S.W.3d at 830. "The final test for legal sufficiency must always be whether the evidence at trial would enable reasonable and fair minded people to reach the verdict under review." City of

Keller v. Wilson,

168 S.W.3d 802, 827 (Tex.2005). A JNOV should be granted: (1) when the evidence is conclusive, and one party is entitled to recover as a matter of law; or (2) when a legal principle precludes recovery. John Masek Corp. v. Davis, 848 S.W.2d 170, 173 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, writ denied).

QUESTION2 The Jury did not have evidence in regards to misappropriations of assets and lost profits as described in Final Judgment. 3CR 185 MISAPPROPRIATIONS OF ASSETS Misappropriations of assets $721 ,166.00.This comprised of $340,000.00 that Kahn had used to transfer funds. 2RR 15. There is testimony by Kahn that these

funds are

in this registry of the Court. 2RR 110, 2RR 111. There were questions on the amount that was in the registry of the Court and it appeared confusing. It is the

16

*33 culmination of the funds so that nothing was stolen. Powers says that the funds went

to the registry 4RR

142. There is no document, or motion or order claiming that the funds that were placed in the registry of the court were not adequate. There was no evidence showing that the $340,000 did not go into the registry of the court. The court did not want the amount placed in the registry of the court to go to the jury 4RR 143 so that the only evidence is that the $340,000 went to the registry of the court.

Therefore these funds are not in the possession of Kahn and cannot be construed to be misappropriated. The reality is that the funds were distributed as per 3CR 41, 82

Loans to share holders $380,166.00 shown on income tax form were funds sent to Joabert and used on the Royal Crest property. This information was forbidden to get to the jury because of the Final Judgment And Sanction Order (collateral estoppel ) There is no evidence that the funds went to Kahn, nor is there any evidence that an actual loan was made to Kahn except the notation on the income tax. The jury was instructed under definitions that Puerto Verde Ltd. was the sole shareholder of Helvetia since 2007. 3CR193 This instruction has more weight than the notation on the income tax without any verification and should be considered that Puerto Verde Ltd is the shareholder and debtor. There is no evidence that Burton Kahn made that loan. There were no loan documents papers nor was there

17 *34 any indication of when this loan occurred. The complete bank records of Kahn and all other corporations that Kahn controlled should show if Kahn received any loan distribution. APPENDIX-EXHIBIT C. The representative of Helvetia, Ms. Guzman did not present any evidence as to a loan. Ms. Guzman did not complain that there was any misappropriations of any funds. Ms. Guzman, the only representative officer of Helvetia only testified by reading what Robert Ripley said and submitting Exhibit 9 the Robert Ripley handwritten note to Robert Ripley on title companies e-mail. We only heard from how Werner Powers the attorney (non witness) for Helvetia in his closing arguments that it was Kahn misappropriated funds. 4RR 142. There is no evidence of any loan documents. There is no evidence that these funds went to Kahn.

No evidence of what happened in 2013? No evidence that the loan paid? Kahn was prohibited from testifying anything about the Royal Crest Project or Joabert. The reality theory that Joabert was the financier and the funds distributed to Joabert was the stockholder loan stated on the income tax statement. Appellee prevented Chris Kohn ("Kohn")the accountant, who authored the income tax statement from testifying. Appellee did not call Kohn. The inference that no information is given regarding the loan information shows that Appellee was hiding something. This refusal or avoidance is tantamount to a taking a fifth

18 *35 amendment exemption in a criminal case. This is a civil case. The Constitution permits a trier of fact to draw such adverse inferences against a party in a civil suit. Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976). There is no evidence showing that Kahn got funds from this loan.

LOST PROFITS Mary Ripley Guzman ("Guzman"), the representative of Helvetia did not produce any sales records and any lost sales. There is no evidence showing that there were any lost profits. The testimony of Adam Smith ("Smith") the Builder claimed that he had lost two sales in the period since the dispute. Smith stated he had sold 20 lots in this period, and usually loses I 0% of the sales 4RR 222 . (2 lost house sales) Thus there were no lost sales and no lost profits. Adam Smith did not provide any documentation to show that there were any lost profits. The calculation and non testimony of attorney powers showing lost profits by using Amanda Tidmore ("Tidmore"), the title closer is not competent evidence. Tidmore claimed that she did not close on 5 transactions 4RR208. She did not specify what type of transactions nor did she know the lot numbers or whether those lots were sold to somebody else. Tidmore did not purchase any lots. Tidmore only works for an insurance company, who insures title. The person who would know, if there were lost sales of lots would

19

*36 be Guzman, the representative of Helvetia. Since the dispute to the trial to June 1, 2014 in reality there were 36 homes sold in this. And last year same period there were only 14 so there was no lost profits whatsoever with an additional $525,000 =/- income to Helvetia. 3CR 91-394 (Sales per Bexar County Clerk)

In Helena Chemical Company v. Wilkins, 47 S.W.3d 486 (Tex. 2001) states: Recovery for lost profits does not require that the loss be susceptible to exact calculation. Texas Instruments, Inc.

v. Teletron Energy Mgmt., Inc.,

877 S.W.2d 276, 279 (Tex. 1994). However, the injured party must do more than show that it suffered some lost profits. Teletron

Energy Mgmt., Inc.,

877 S.W.2d at 279. The loss amount must be shown by competent evidence with reasonable certainty. Szczepanik v. First S. Trust Co., 883 S.W.2d

648, 649 (Tex. 1994);

Holt Atherton Indus., Inc. v. Heine, 835 S.W.2d 80, 84 (Tex. 1992). This is a fact-intensive determination. Heine, 835 S.W.2d at 84. At a minimum, opinions or lost-profit estimates must be based on objective facts, figures, or data from which the lost profits amount may be ascertained. Szczepanik, 883

S.W.2d at 649;

Heine, 835 S.W.2d at 84.

In a recent case JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Professional Pharmacy II, 02-11-00373- CV (Tex.App.-Ft. Worth 12-31-2014) reiterates the same facts. Appellee did not provide any facts and documentation as per described in Helena Chemical Company v. Wilkins, supra

Therefore there is no evidence of lost profits. 20 *37 QUESTION 5. The Jury did not have evidence in regards to Kahn held for Helvetia. Misappropriations of assets $721 ,166.00. see Response Question 2 QUESTION?. The Jury did not have evidence that any damages were caused by Kahn's slander of Helvetia's title. There is no evidence of any lost profits by testimony of Guzman or Smith. In fact an increase of over $525, 000 income.

Helvetia did not suffer any damages any lost profits and continued normal operations. There is no evidence showing that there was any lost profits. The testimony of Adam Smith the Builder claimed that he had lost two sales in the period since the dispute. Adam Smith stated he had sold 20 lots in this period, and usually loses I 0% of the sales that are not culminated. (2 lost lots sales) Thus there were no lost sales and no lost profits. Adam Smith did not provide any documentation to show that there was any lost profits. The calculation and non testimony of attorney powers showing a was profits by using Amanda Tidmore, the title closer is not competent evidence.

21 *38 QUESTION9 The Jury did not have evidence for damages that Kahn's filing of a fraudulent court record. Helvetia did not suffer any damages any lost profits and continued normal operations. There is no evidence showing that there was any lost profits. The testimony of Adam Smith the Builder claimed that he had lost two sales in the period since the dispute. Adam Smith stated he had sold 20 lots in this period, and usually loses I 0% of the sales that are not culminated. (2 lost lots sales) Thus there were no lost sales and no lost profits. Adam Smith did not provide any documentation to show that there was any lost profits. The calculation and non testimony of attorney powers showing a was profits by using Amanda Tidmore, the title closer is not compete you evidence. The is no evidence for damages that Kahn's filing of a fraudulent court record.

QUESTION 11 The Jury did not have evidence for exemplary damages due to the fact there were no actual damages that Kahn has caused per Questions 2, 5, 7, &9. In

Powers v. M. L.,

14-09-00814-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 10-26-2010) states:

22 *39 Section 41.004(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code precludes exemplary damages when no actual damages are awarded. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 41.004(a) (West 2008)~ see Avco Corp., Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Div. of Avco Corp. v. Interstate Southwest, Ltd., 251 S.W.3d 632, 662

(Tex. App.-Houston [14th] 2007, pet. denied) (citing

Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 41.004(a)) ("Exemplary damages are not available unless the plaintiff establishes that it sustained actual loss or injury as the result of an underlying tort."). Accordingly, we sustain appellant's first issue.[fn2]

QUESTION 14 There being no actual damages, attorney fees are not applicable. In Johnson

Savage v. Fehrenkamp,

03-05-00060-cv (Tex.App.-Austin 4-2-2009) states: Precision Tune asserts that the attorneys' fee award was improper because there was no finding of the actual damages required to support such an award. We agree.

Therefore the attorney fees are not allowed. CONCLUSION OF ISSUE 2 This Appellate Court should reverse the trial court's judgment of June 11, 2014 and remand this case to the trial court for a new jury trial on the merits and not allow Collateral Estoppel from the Final Judgment and Sanction Order determining the ownership of the shares of Helvetia, because trial he court abused

23 *40 its discretion by denying appellant's JNOV because the jury's answers were not based on the evidence presented.

ISSUE 3 THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY NOT ALLOWING ANY APPELLANT'S WITNESSES TO GIVE TESTIMONY DUE TO LACK OF DETAIL IN DISCLOSURE FILED 6 DAYS BEFORE TRIAL.

Appellee filed a motion to exclude witnesses on May 6, 2014 2CR 230 complaining that disclosing over fifty new witness on the eve of trial and giving nothing but a telephone number is trial by ambush. This is another LIE by Appellee state to the court because Appellant filed this same list in January, 2014,and again in March 31, 2014. Each witness as a brief description (mainly their title of who they are and from that title a connection to the project is shown. Appellee had ample time to complain but chose to ambush Appellant. Tex. Civ. P. 194 .2 ( e) the name address telephone number of persons having knowledge of relevant facts and a brief statement of each identified person connection to the case with the case. The trial court ruled that the description was insufficient. 5 RR 87

The court abused its discretion by not allowing Appellant time to respond to Appellee's claim of no knowledge which was another LIE. The witness Tracy Plumber, Court Reporter was discussed in Defendants Demand To Return Original Documents. The only original document was 24 *41 allowed by request because of other investigations and document, Exhibit 39 was

specially marked as Exhibit 39-0

Supp.A 4RR 22, consisting of a transmittal and instruction letter, By Laws and the Minutes Of The Organizational Meeting Of The Board Of Directors Of Helvetia Asset Inc. A For Profit Corporation dated August 8, 2007 Supp.A lEXH 381.

The original document of the handwritten self serving wiring instructions

Supp.A 1 EXH 32, that was not sent to anyone was replaced by Appellee without permission and not specially marked. The question was when the document was signed and ink dating.

The possible witness FBI Agent Jenson who investigated Kahn due to Appellee's false claim that Appellant stole $400,000. The possible rebuttal of this witness in light of Appellant filing a complete accounting total compilation El CR 1-32 which shows that Appellant is owed over $77,000.

In Oscar Luis Lopez v. Madel. ofTexas, 200 S.W.3d 854 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2006) states: "Further, it would increase the opportunities for parties - both plaintiff and defendant- to "sandbag" each other in hopes of a favorable trial outcome based on the disfavored practice of "trial by ambush." Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's final judgment and remand

25 *42 this cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion."

InMcCrawv. Maris, 828 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. 1992) states: For the exclusion of evidence to constitute reversible error, the complaining party must show (1) that the trial court committed error and (2) that the error was reasonably calculated to cause and probably did cause rendition of an improper judgment. Gee v. Liberty Mut.

Ins. Co.,

765 S.W.2d 394, 396 (Tex. 1989); TEX.R.APP.P. 8l(b)(l).

CONCLUSION OF ISSUE 3 This Appellate Court should reverse the trial court's judgment of June 11, 2014 and remand this case to the trial court for a new jury trial on the merits and not allow Collateral Estoppel from the Final Judgment and Sanction Order determining the ownership of the shares of Helvetia, because trial he Court abused its discretion by not allowing any appellant's witnesses to give testimony due to lack of detail in disclosure filed 6 days before trial.

ISSUE 4 THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY STRIKING DEFENDANTS' FIRST AMENDED ORIGINAL ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION RELIEF, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, VERIFIED DENIALS, THIRD PARTY CLAIMS, AND MOTION TO SHOW AUTHORITY. Supp. C 1 CRl

26

*43 Appellee filed special exceptions on May 6, 2014. Supp.D lCR 1 Appellee Complained paragraph 3, that will a Kahn has no authority to represent Helvetia and Paradiv Corporation because Kahn is not a licensed attorney. Kahn agrees to that special exception.

Appellee Complained paragraph 4. "4. To the extent the confusing allegations could be construed as some sort of trial of right to property with respect to the stock of Helvetia, that dispute is between Mr. Kahn and Puerto Verde, Ltd., the real owner of Helvetia. Mr. Kahn has not sued Puerto Verde, Ltd., who is clearly an indispensable party in any dispute concerning the ownership of stock. Accordingly, if this were such a claim being asserted, it cannot be asserted for lack of an indispensable party."

These special exceptions forced Appellant to file an amended answer eliminating Paradiv and include Puerto Verde as to defendant an indispensable party. This again is trial by ambush. See Issue 3

The court found that the special sections did not require a rep leading of the answer. 2RR14 ."THE COURT: ... Now, I don't find that the first amended original answer is in any way tied to special exceptions or elicited by special

27 *44 exceptions. There's no question under the rules that it. is untimely filed. It is stricken. That's the first thing. It is stricken."

CONCLUSION OF ISSUE 4 This decision was an abuse of discretion. The Special Exceptions forced Appellant to Answer. The elimination of the amended answer did not allow Appellant to bring in any evidence regarding Joabert and or Royal Crest subdivision which was the main purpose of all the work and investment for all those years. This ruling eliminated Appellant from having a defense and a fair trial and is cause for this Honorable Appellate Court should reverse the trial court's judgment of June 11 , 2014 and remand this case to the trial court for a new jury trial on the merits and not allow Collateral Estoppel from the Final Judgment and Sanction Order determining the ownership of the shares of Helvetia.

ISSUE 5 THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY GRANTING APPELLEE' S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OR ALTERNATIVELY MOTION IN LIMINE ON ALL ITEMS AND SUSTAINING ALL APPELLEE'S OBJECTIONS. EACH ITEM OBJECTION FROM APPELLEE WAS SUSTAINED AND DEPRIVED APPELLANT AN OPPORTUNITY TO DEFEND HIMSELF.

28 *45 This issue is moot, if this Honorable Appellate Court sustains any of the

previous issues.

If it affirms all previous issues then the claim that Appellant was not allowed present financial documentation when Appellee was allowed to present to the jury partial incomplete and out of context financial data. This allowed an unfair trail and should A copulation of the financial data is in the Appendix as Exhibit A.

CONCLUSION This Appellate Court should reverse the trial court's judgment of June 11, 2014 and remand this case to the trial court for a new jury trial on the merits based on any one of the 5 issues presented.

PRAYER For the reasons, Appellant prays that this Honorable Court of Appeals reverse the trial court's judgment of June 11 , 2014 and remand this case to the trial court for a new jury trial on the merits and not allow Collateral Estoppel from the Final Judgment and Sanction Order determining the ownership of the shares of Helvetia.

Respectfully submitted, Burton Kahn. Pro-se 1 706 Alpine Cir., San Antonio, TX 78248 glentrail@yahoo.com

29 *46 Tel (210) 408-9199 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Based on a word count run in Microsoft Word 2010 , this brief contains 6,388 words, excluding the caption, identity of the parties and counsel, statement regarding oral argument, table of contents, index of authorities, statement of the case, statement of issues presented, citations to record, signature, proof of service, certificate of compliance, and appendix, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 9.4.

Burton Kahn Pro-se CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of this Motion was served on Appellee, Helvetia Asset Recovery Inc. through counsel of record on February 5, 2015.by Via Email Lisa. Barkley@haynesboone.com Haynes and Boone LLP Lisa Barkley 112 E. Pecan St. Suite 1200 San Antonio, TX 78205 - 1524 Via E-mail Werner.Powers @hayneshoone.com Werner A. Powers Natalie DuBose Haynes & Boone, LLP 2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700 Dallas, Texas 7 5 219 ~~ Burton Kahn

30 *47 STATEOFTEXAS § BEXAR COUNTY §

VERIFICATION

Before m~, the undersigned notary on this day personally appeared Burton Kahn the affiant, a person whose identity is known to me. After I administered the oath to affiant, affiant testified:

"My name is Burton Kahn I am overv 18 years of age, sound mind, and capable of making this affidavit I have read the brief attached hereto. The facts stated in a within my personal knowledge and are nd c Sworn to and subscribed before me by Burton Kahn on February 4, 2015

~ Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My commission e xp i r e s -

31 *48 APPENDIX A. FINAL JUDGMENT AND JURY CHARGE B. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE §10.001(2) C. FIINACIAL RECORDS TABULATION

32 *49 EXHIBIT A *50 2~13CI~~~55 -0037 NO. 2013-Cl-18355 HELVETJA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. IN THE DISTRICT COURT § § Plaintiff, § § v. § BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS § BURTON KAHN and § PARADIV CORPORATION, § 37

§ · DefendanJs. 4Wth JUDICIAL DISTRICT §

FINAL JUDGMENT

On May 12, 2014; the Court called this case for trial. Plaintiff Helvetia Asset Recovery, Jnc. appeared through its attorneys and annou·nced ready for trial. Defendant Burton Kahn appeared in person pro se and -announced ready for trial. Defendant Paradiv Corporation did not appear except through Its director and officer, Burton Kahn, who is not licensed to practice law in this state. The Court then empanelled and swore a jury consisting of twelve qualified jurors, and the case proceeded to trial. At the close of the evidence, the Court submitted questions, definitions, and instructions to the jury. On May 21, 2014, the jury returned its verdict. The

m fl .-,

Charge of the Court and the jury's verdict are attached hereto and are incorporated herein by ! l

i

reference. This Final Judgment expressly incorporates all findings of the jury for all purposes. I 2

The jury's verdict was received, filed and entered of record. Plaintiff moved for ~I J il

judgment on the verdict, and the Court, having considered ·the pleadings, the evidence, the jury v

verdict, and the applicable law, hereby renders Final Judgment on the verdict (the "Judgment")

0 L

as follows: 4 Jt is ORDERED and DECREED that Plaintiff is declared the owner of the funds in the ~

9

registry of the Court that were deposited by Defendants pursuant to the Temporary Injunction p c; 8 8

FINAL JUDGMENT 5

previously entered herein, and that totaled, at the time of disbursement, the amount· of

*51 / $291,453.6 I. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff recover from Defendants Burton Kahn and Paradiv Corporation the sum of $854, I 66 in actual damages, plus pre-judgment interest from November 4, 2013, at the rate of $117.0 I per day until the day before this Judgment is signed.

It is further ORDERED that Defendants receive a credit for sums Plaintiff received from the registry of the Court in the amount of$291 ,453.6 1, said credit to be applied against the actual damages and accrued interest as of the date the Judgment is signed. ·

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff recover from Defendant Burton Kahn exemplary damages in the sum of$900,000. It is further ORDERED and DECREED that Plaintiff recover its reasonable attorneys' fees as allowed by the Texas Declaratory Judgment Act and pursuant to Chapter 12 of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code,§ 12.002(b)(3).

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff recover from Defendants Burton Kahn and Paradiv Corporation attorneys' fees in the sum of $280,000. In the event of an appeal to the court of appeals, Plaintiff, if successful, shaH recover an additional $20,000 in fees, and, if another appeal is sought; Plaintiff shall recover another $10,000 in fees.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff recover all costs of court. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff recover on all amounts awarded herein post-

judgment interest at the highest lawful rate allowed by law as of the date of this Judgment until paid.

Jt is further ORDERED that all amounts awarded herein, other than exemplary damages, are jointly and severally owed by Defendants Burton Kahn and Paradiv Corporation. Page2 FlNAL JUDGMENT

*52 lt is further ORDERED that Burton Kahn deliver and deposit into the registry of this Court within the next 30 days any sums that he was previously ordered to deposit into the registry of the Court and did not.

It is further ORDERED that Burton Kahn be and he is permanently enjoined from conducting business in the name of the Plaintiff or in any way interfering with Plaintiff's business activities, including but not limited to Plaintiff's sales of lots in the Key Largo subdivision, based on any fact or circumstance that exists as of the date this Judgment is entered or which has ever existed in the past.

It is further ORDERED that all writs and processes necessary or appropriate for the enforcement or collection of this Judgment or the costs of court may issue as necessary. All relief requested in this case and not expressly granted is denied. This Judgment finally disposes of all claims and all parties and is an appealable Final Judgment. SIGNED this// dayof~2014.

D-2273499_2

Pagel FINAL JUDGMENT

EXHIBIT A

*53 *54 1111 ff:~~~-11111. .. . - ··' \. . 201JC!t8335 -P00l91 . .. . ·~ . CAUSE NO. 2013-Cl-18355 HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY. JNC •• IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, v.

BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS

BURTON KAHN and "PARADIV CORPORATION, § Defendants. 407TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT §. JURY CHARGE LADIES AND GENTLEMEN OF THE JURY: After the cJosing arguments, you wiH go lo the jury room to decide the case ^[1] answer ·the questions that are attached, and reach a verdict. You may.discuss the case with other jurors on Jy when you are all together in the jury room.

Remember my previous instructions: Do not dis<:uss the case with anyone else, either in person or by any other means. Do not do any independent investigation about the case or conduct any research. Do not look up any words in dictionaries or on the Internet Do not post infonnalion about the case on the Internet.

' q Do not share any special knowledge or experiences with the other jurors.

E1

/ ' / ~,

Do not use your phone or any other electronic devfoe during your deliberations for any reason. Here arc the instructions for answering the qu~tions: (. ,

(I

J J. Do not let bias, prejudice or sympathy play any part in your decision. ~i

• 2. · Base your answers only on the evidence admitted in court and on the law that is in v

tbese instructions and questions. Do not consider or discuss any evidence that was not admitted

0 I- in the ~zm ~As ~

"'?!!' 3. Ya\.il~J<U'ake up your own mind about the facts. You are the sole judges of 4 2 the credibiJHY:RfQi.e ~i;\~rs.~~s. ~d the weight to give their testimony. But on the matters of law, 3

you must :tHflow ~1i rrl:Y··msb-U.thons. . · ·wa 1o:h i~· 1 N.[loa H~x3s tioz o 6 J..'r/W ~ p 7:,>33 rJ lJl~lSIO n ).~~iii)!~~ W>I VHNOO

'\/ ( G . Cl~lJ .I • ~ ' lURYCHARGE ... )\ ~- Page I 0

Document

scanned as filed.

~ *55 4. If jnstructions use a word in a way that is different from its ordjnary meaning, use the meaning I give you, which will be a proper legal definition. 5. All the.questions and answers are important. No one should say that any question or answer is not important. 6. Answer "Yes" or "No" to all questions unless you are told otherwise. A ''Yes" answer must be based on a preponderance of the evidence (unless you are told otherwise). Whenever a question requires an answer other than "Yes" or ''No," your answer must be based on a preponderance of the evidence (unless you are told otherwise).

The term ''preponderance of the evidence" means the greater weight of credible evidence presented in this case. If you do not find a preponderance of the evidence supports a "Yes" answer, then answer "No." A preponderance of the evidence is not measured by the number of witnesses or by the number of documents admitted in ·eviden~. For a fact to be proved by a preponderance of the evidence. you must find that the fact is more likely true than not true.

7. Do not decide who you think should win before you answer the questions and then just answer the questions to match your decision. Answer each question carefully without considering who will win. Do not discuss or consider the effect your answers will have.

8. Do not answer questions by drawing straws or by any method of chance, 9. . Some questions might ask you for a dollar amount. Do not agree in advance to

decide on a dollar amount by adding up each juror's amount and then figuring the average. 10. Do not trade your answers. For examp1e, do not say, "I wiU answer this question your way if you answer another question my way." l 1. The answers to the questions must be based on the decision of at least ten of the () g

twelve jurors. The same ten jurors must agree on every answer. Do not agree to be bound by a vote of anything less than ten jurors, even if it would be a majority. i

")'

As J have said before, if you do not follow these instructions, you will be guilty of juror / misconduct, and I might have to order a new trial and start this process over again. This will ·~ waste your time and the parties' money, and would require the taxpayers of thjs county to pay for 9. another trial If a juror breaks any of these rules, tell that person to stop and report it to me immediateJy.

,!~ v 0 L 4 2 7. ~~ g p Cl

Page2 JURY C!iAROE *56 • I Presiding Jui-or 1. When you go into the jury room to answer the questions, the first thing you wiJl need tO do is choose a Presiding Juror. 2. The Presiding Juror has these duties:

a. Have the complete charge read aloud if it will be helpful to your deliberations; b. Preside over your deliberations, meaning manage the discussions and see that you

follow these instructions; c. Give written questions or comments to the bailiff who will give them to the judge; · d. Write down the answers you agree on; e. Get the signatures for the verdict certificate, and f. Notify the baiHffthat you have reached a verdict.

Do you understand the duties of the Presiding Juror? If you do not, please telJ me now. Instructions for Signing the Verdict Certificate 1. You may answer the questions on a vote of ten jurors. The same ten jurors must agree on every answer in the charge. Th.is means you may not have one group oftenjurors agree on one answer and a different group of ten jurors agree on another answer.

2. If ten jurors agree on every answer, those ten jurors sign the verdict. 3. If eleven jurors agree on every answer, those eleven jurors sign the verdict. 4. lf all twelve of you agree on every answer, you are unanimous and only the Presiding

Juror signs the verdict. 5. All jurors should deliberate on every question. You may end up with all twelve of you agreeing on some answers, while only ten or eleven of you agree on other answers. But when you sign the verdict, only those ten who agree on every answer will sign the verdict.

Do you understand these instructions?. If you do not, please tell me now. ~f:1.,,7c ~OGE PRESIDING

·' '

Page 3

JURY CHARGE

*57 . ·'

DEFINITIONS

You are instructed to use the following definitions' when the defined words appear in specific questions or instructions. I. "Helvetia" refers to the Plaintiff Helvetia Asset Recovery; Inc. "Puerto Verde" refers to Helvetia's sole sharehokler, which is in ~ wholly 2.

owned by Robert llipley, -'<4! ~ 3 . ~ ••Kahn" refers to Defendant Burton Kahn.

ME:'.

"I I.(. ~ "Paradiv" refers to Defendant Paradiv Corporation 5. The "Rule 11 Agreement" refers to the document titled "Rule 11 Agreement" and dated November 15, 2013. Tue Rule 11 Agreement is part of the evidence admitted by the Court and is JabeJed Plaintiff's Ex. 35.

1!1 6 j t 2 t) ~J v 0 L

Page4 JUR'Y CHARO£ *58 QUESTION NO. l Did Kahn fail to comply with his fiduciary duty to Helvetia? You are instructed that Kahn owed a fiduciary duty to Helvetia to conduct its affairs in the best interest of its sole shareholder, Puerto Verde, which was wholly owned by Robert rupley. Fwther, Kahn was obligated to place Helvetia;s ]nterests ahead of his own and not to use his position for his personal gain at the expense of Helvetia. Further, a fiduciary owes a duty of utmost loyalty, honesty, good faith and fairness. Further; when one enters into a fiduciary relationship, he consents as a matter of law to · bave his conduct measured by higher ethical standards than the standards that apply to parties who are not in a fiduciary relationship.

Answer "Yes" or "No'.': Pages JURVCHARGI; *59 QUESTION NO. 2 If you answered "Y~" to Question No. I, then answer the following question. Otherwise, do not answer the followjng question. What sum of money, if any, if paid now in cash, would fairly and reasonably compensate Helvetia for its damages, if any, that were proximately caused by the conduct you found in answer to Question No. l? · Answer in dollars and cents, if any:

$ 'ltl 16&> 1. Misappropriation, if any, of assets: $ )3~ OOD 2. Lost profits, if any: v 0 L 4 i

Page6 JURYCHAAOE *60 - . , . I . . QUESTION NO. 3 ls Kahn responsible for the conduct of Paradiv Corporation? You are instructed that Kahn is responsible for the conduct of Para.div if Kahn used Paradiv as a means of perpetrating a fraud for the direct personal benefit of Kahn.

"Fraud" in this context means the breach of some legal or equitable duty, such as a fiduciary duty.

Answer "Yes" or "No;" ~1

j

/ ·") "· 0 a v 0 L 4 ... , ~ 9 p G

Page7

JURY CHAR.GE

*61 . ... .

QUESTION NO. 4

Did Kahn hold money which, in equity and good conscience, belonged to Helvetia? -1ft .... ~ ... ..,__ __

Answer "Y.es" or "No:"

Page 8 g JURY CHARGE 4 l

*62 . I . QUESTION NO. 5 If you answered "Yes" to Question No.4, then answer the following 'question. Otherwise, do not answer the following question. What sum of money, if any, do you find that Kahn held that belonged to Helvetia?

Answer in dollars and cents, if any. Amow1t:

G)

6 / ~I / ~ 4 v 0 L 4 2 ~ p ..... ... ,

,.

Page 9 lURYCHAROF. 8 ~ 2

*63 .. . ·. · ... .. . . I QUESTlONNO. 6 Did Kahn slander Helvetia's title to lots in the "Key Largo" subdivision? You are instructed that slander of title means a person acted deliberately and without reasonable cause to publish false and disparaging words about Helvetia's title to the "Key Largo•• subdivision lots, thereby causing a specific loss of a sale or sales.

\£.> Answer "Yes" or "No:" -Jff2'+<"'::;....._-- Page 10 JURY CHARGE *64 ..... ....

QUESTION.NO. 7

If you an8wered "Yes" to Question No. 6, then answer the following question. Otherwise, do not answer the following question. What damages, if any, do you find were caused by Kahn's slander ofHelvetia's title to the "Key Largo" subdivision lots?

You are instructed that the amount of damages, if any, to be awarded should be those damages which would compensate Helvetia for the .loss of any sale(s) suffered as a result of the slander of title.

Answer in dollars and cents, if any. $ l'?~f;t;Q

Amount:

r s 8 Ei / t fl l 4 v 0 L 4 .... ,

t.

3 9 ~I G

Page 11 JURY· CHARGE G 8 a

*65 • I QUESTION NO. 8 Did Kahn file a fraudulent court record or claim against real property owned by Helvetia? You arc instructed that a fraudulent court record or claim means it was filed: (1) with knowJedge that it was fraudulent, (2) wi1h the intent that it be given legal effect as a court record or document

evidencing a valid claim or interest in real property, and (3) with the intent to cause physical injury, financial injury. or mental anguish or emotional distress. fe2

Answer"Yes" ot "No:"

~t ,1· J 7 I 2 a l ll Page 12

JURY CHARGE

QUESTION NO. 9

*66 If you answered nYes" to Question No. 8, then answer the following question. Otherwise, do not answer the following questiofl. What damages, if any, do you find were caused by Kahn's filing of a fraudulent court record or claim against property owned by Helvetia?

Answer in dollars and cents, if any. Amount:

.8

/ ' / 2 () .~i v 0 L 4 ~i /.. 3

9

p G

Page I3 JURY CHARGE I] 8 4 6

*67 QUESTlON NQ. 10 Answer the following only if you unanimously answered "Yes" to Question No. 1 or Question No.3_ Do you find by clear and convincing evidence that Kahn committed the conduct you found in answer to Question No. 1 or Question No. 3 either maliciously, fraudulently or through gross neglect?

To answer "Yes'' to this question your answer must be unanimous. You may answer "No" if ten or more of you answer "No." Otherwise, do not answer the question at al 1. You are instructed that "clear and canvincing evidence" means the degree of proof that produces a firm belief or conviction of the truth of the allegations sought to be established. · "Malic.e" means a specific intent by a person to cause substantial injury or harm to HeJvetia.

Answer "Yes" or "No: ^[1] ' p G

Page 14 JURY CHAROE 8 8 4 7

*68 QUESTION NO. l 1 Answer the following question only if you unanimously answered "Yes" to Question No. 10. Otherwise do not answer the following question. You are instructed that the answer for this question must be unanimous. Otherwise, do not answer this question. What sum of money, if any, do you find by clear and convincing evidence, if paid now in cash, should be awarded to Helvetia as exemplary damages. if any.

You are instructed that "exemplary damages» means an amount that you may in your discretion award as a penalty by way of punishment. Factors to be considered in awarding exemplary damages, if any, are:

(I) the nature of the wrong; (2) the character of the conduct involved; (3) the degree of culpabillty; (4) the situation and sensitivities of tile parties concerned; (S) the extent to which such conduct offeods the public sense of justice and Jlropriety; (6) the Defendant's net worth.

Cl Answer in dollars and cents, if any. t3 / ~I

Amount: l ~ l 4 v e ~ 9 p G

Page 15 JURY CHARGE ~ 4 8 *69 . I

. I

Q_UESTION NO. 12

~ Answer the following question only if you unanimously answered "'Yes" to Question No. 1 1. Othetwise do not answer the following question. You are instructed that the answer for this question must be unanimous. Otherwise, do not answer this question. Do you find, by dear and convincing evidence, that Kahn conunitted theft, if any, of property valued at $20,000 or greater? ·

You are instructed that "theft" means that a person unlawfully appropriates property with the intent to deprive the owner of the property. Appropriating property is unlawful if it is without the owner's effective consent.

A person acts with intent with respect to the nature of his conduct or to a result of his conduct when it is the conscious objective or desire to engage in the conduct or cause the result. ''Deprive" means to withhold property from the owner permanent! y or for so extended a period of time . that a major portion of the vallle or enjoyment of the property is lost to the owner. "'Owner" means one who has title to the property, possession of the property, whether lawfuJ or not, or a greater right to possession of the property than Kahn or Paradiv. "Property" means: (a) real property; (b) tangible or intangible personal property, including anything severed from land; or (c) a document, including money, that represents or embodies anything of value. "Consent" means assent in fact, whether express or implied. "Effective consent" includes consent by a person legally authorized to act for the O\mer. Consent is not effective if induced by deception or coercion.

Answer "Yes" or "No:" 4 2 3 ~~ p G

Page 16 JURY CHARGE 0 8 4 *70 ~'

·.,·. QUESTION NO. 13. ,!< ~ ,.,,_ Answer the following question only if you unanimously answered "Y-esl' t<' Question No. 11, Otherwise do not answer the following question. You are instructed that the answer for this question must be unanimous. Otherwise, do not answer this question. Do you find, by clear and convincing evidence; that Kahn:

A. intentionally misapplied the following owned by Helvetia in a manner that involved. substanlial risk of Joss to Helvetia: a. money, or b. lots in the "Key Largo" subdivision; and

B. that the value of the money or lots was $ 1 , 500 or greater? You are instructed that "misapply" means a person deals with property or money contrary to an agreement under which the person hol<:Uthe property or money.

""(I{

Also; "substantial risk of Joss» means it is more likely than not that loss wm occur. A person acts with intent with respect to the nature of his conduct or to a result of his conduct when it is the conscious objective or desire to engage in the conduct or cause the result.

~-+t;6~~--

Answer .. Yes" .or "No:..,

Page !7 JURY CliAR.OE 0 ~· .... ,

r·

) *71 Cl

QUESTION NO. 14

What is a reasonable fee for the necessary services of Helvetia's attorneys in this case? In determining a reasonable and necessary fee you may consider the following factors:

the time and labor involved; • • the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved; • the skiJJ required to perform the legal services properly; • the likelihood that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude

other employment by the lawyer; • the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services; the amount involved and the results obtained; • • the time limitations imposed by the client or the circumstances; • the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client • the experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the

services; and • whether the fee is fixed or contingent on results obtained or uncertainty of collection before the legal services have been rendered. Answer with an amount for each of the following: s Jfl). D_QO a. For preparation and trial: Answer:. I $ .zqooo b. For an appeal to the Court of Appeals: Answer: $ lD., O{)J) c. For an appeal to the Supreme Court of Texas: Answer: Page 18 JuRv Cf-lAROc . g 5 *72 l

, • I VERDICT CERTIFICATE 'Check one; 7 Our verdict is unanimous. All twelve of us hav reed lo each and every an;wer. The 1¥ ~ 'VL .

presiding juror has signed the certificate for a

--- Our verdict is not unanimous.

us have agreed to each and every answer and have signed the certificate below. ___ Our \•erdict is not unanimous. Ten of us have agreed to each and every answer and have signed the certificate below. Signature Name Printed -J\·9·

AHlrJ30 I 0 :z Wd I Z H1'i ; ~ A1Nn03 HVX3B >fijJl~ 1an.u-s10

Page 19 A3HNl'>f51-/ A\f~lf"fiNOa: ··

J\JR Y CH/IR GE

0311J. ~ 0 8 I • 5 ~t t..

*73 Document : scanned as filed. .. J EXHIBITB *74 Texas Statutes 0 Texas Statutes CJ CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE Ll TITLE 2. TRIAL, JUDGMENT, AND APPEAL CJ SUBTITLE A. GENERAL PROVISIONS Ll CHAPTER 10. SANCTIONS FOR FRIVOLOUS PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS § 10.001 CIV. PRAC. & REM. Signing of Pleadings and Motions

The s i gn i ng o f a pl ead i ng or moti on as requ i red by t he Texas Rules o f Ci v il Procedure con st itu t es a certificat e b y t he s i gna t ory tha t t o the s i g na t ory ' s bes t knowledge , info rmat i on , and b elie f, forme d afte r r easonab le inqu i ry :

(1 ) the pl e a d i ng or mo tion i s not be i ng pres ented f or any i mproper pur pose , inc l uding to harass or to cause unnecessar y delay or needl ess i nc r ease in the cost of liti ga t io n;

(2) e a ch c l a i m, def ense , o r other l e g a l con t en tion i n the p l eading o r mot ion i s warran t ed by e xi s t i n g l aw or by a nonf r ivo l o u s argument for t he e xtens i on , modi f i cati o n, or reversal of ex i s tin g law or t he est ab l ishmen t o f new l aw ;

(3) each a l legat i o n or other fac t ual con t e ntion in t he pleadi ng or motion has ev i denti ary support or , f or a spec ifi ca l ly i den tifi ed a ll egat i on or f act ua l cont enti on , i s li ke l y t o h ave e vi den ti ary support aft er a reasonable opportun i t y fo r fur ther i nvest i ga t ion or di scov ery; a nd

( 4) each den i a l i n t he p l e a d i ng or mo tion o f a f ac tua l contenti on i s war ranted o n t he evidence o r, f or a s p ec ifi ca lly i dent if ied den i a l, i s reason ably based on a l ack o f i nf ormati o n or be li ef .

Added b y Ac t s 1 99 5, 7 4th Le g., ch . 1 37 , § 1, e f f . Sep t. 1 , 1 995 . *75 Texas Statutes 0 Texas Statutes Ll CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE CJ TITLE 2. TRIAL, JUDGMENT, AND APPEAL CJ SUBTITLE A. GENERAL PROVISIONS Ll CHAPTER 10. SANCTIONS FOR FRIVOLOUS PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS § 10.004 CIV. PRAC. & REM. Violation; sanction

(a) A c o urt t ha t d e t e rmines tha t a person has s igne d a pl e ad i ng or mot i on in v io l a ti o n o f Sect i on 1 0 . 0 0 1 ma y impose a s ancti o n on the p er son , a party represented by the p er son , o r b o th .

(b) The sanct i on mu st be l i mi ted to wha t i s suff i c i ent to dete r repetit i o n o f the conduct or comp arab l e conduct by other s s imil arly s i tuated .

(c ) A sanction may include a ny of the f o ll owing : (1) a d i rect ive to the viola t or to perform, or refrai n f rom performin g , a n act ; (2 ) a n order t o pay a pena l ty i nt o court ; and (3) a n o rder to pay to t he othe r party the a mount of the r easo n ab l e

expenses incurred by the o t her party bec ause o f t he f iling o f the p l e ading or mot i o n , inc l ud i ng rea son a b l e attorney ' s f ees . (d) The court may not award mo netary sancti o n s aga i nst a represen ted

p a r ty f or a v i o l at i on o f Section 10 . 00 1 (2 ) . (e) The cour t ma y not award monetary sanctions on it s own i n itia tive u n les s the court issues its o r der t o show cause before a vo luntary dismis s al or settleme nt of the claims made by or against the party or the pa rty ' s attorn ey who i s to b e sanction ed .

(f ) The fili ng o f a genera l den i a l under Ru l e 92 , Te xa s Ru l es o f Civ il Procedur e , s ha ll not b e deemed a v i o l a tion of t h i s chapte r . Ad ded by Acts 1995 , 7 4th Leg ., ch . 1 37 , § 1 , e ff . Sept . 1 , 1 995 .

*76 EXHIBITC *77 EXHIBIT C BANK ACCOUNTS Summation Sheets YEARS 2010 thru 2013 Banks are Falcon International Bank and Randolph Brooks Credit Union 1. Combined Balance Sheet-Helvetia Joabert and Contour Helvetia Account Balance sheet for Income and Expenses for year and for bank Check register per year per bank from bank statements. Information carried to Balance sheet.

Joabert Account Balance sheet for Income and Expenses for year and for bank Check register per year per bank from bank statements. Information carried to Balance sheet.

Contour Account Balance sheet for Income and Expenses for year and for bank Check register per year per bank from bank statements. Information carried to Balance sheet. *78 - --·-·-···----- BALANCE SHE ' !JOABERT TOTAL CONTOUR iHELVETIA

.. 20,571.26 1,461,017.25 1,352, 332.39 88,113.60 SALES .... ... ·----~- -~··-- - -· -···- -···-··· ·- ~· .--·· - .. -·-· ... 178,744.49 72,130.34 268,403.61 17.528.78 TAX 82,303.01 55,085.06 24,000.00 161,388.07 JR ·-- ·····-----~ BK 599,995.00 ~ .. q.~826. 05 : 4,866.86: 5,959.19

UNKNOWN

SAVINGS ... ... JOABERT 9721 -- . ------ CONTOUR 2918 --------

CONTOUR RBFCU

! --- HEL GOLD 7318 -- 'HEL RBFCU : ---- -----

14412 HEL

459,296.90 482,3-49.43 . CONSTRUCTION 23,052.53 4,018.81 10,809.37 62,515.25 77,343.43 OFFICE EXPENSE TRAIL 7318 123,000.00 ! 123,000.00 -----·--- 326.49- . - - - - - - - 190.00 ~ BANK CHARGES 261.79 778.28: 5,060.00' 1,765.10 6,825.10 PROFESSIONAL -- ··~--- ENG 7,773.70 1.729,53 9,503.23 -·- f - - 30,0Ss.49 INSURANCE -·~o.~.~9- -- . ·-~ ···--· .. . ... s.217.05 584.75 7,692.30 AUTO - 240,000.00 IDEAL 240,000.00 .. TOTAL 606,980.93 1,235,743.31 176,053.50 1,418,782.74 SALES 1.461,017.25 DIFFERENCE OIFF i (42,234.51 . - . .. -----~-••-•ff•-·-·--·····--· ! INITIAL CK AMONT.., .. JOA BERT 275.98 ENO CK BALANCE 614.17 HELVETIA -··- .. ··-·--··- .~-- 22500.00 JR STOLE -_-18844. 36 . BK ACCOUNT ~- ~- CONTOURS FEE 10% 48234.94: 10% 'CONTOURS OH 48234.94 DUE BK 77625.52 - .. -------...-- ··-··· ' ' ... !

-.-- .. ·-··-·

-M--

[---------- 1 - - - -· ...... ----- ! .. -·-·· - --· *79 HELVETIA ACCOUNT *80 I 1 ~AT T ; : . I 2012F--120;3F . h~ I 2013R8 ! !HELV .--.~- 1 !ADJ--... AOJTOALS 2 .___

SA\1MGS

!TOTALS 3 20101 · - 4 lNCQME .. · - 381,118 .. sF: I 14'.{gaool •12 .. 1.32.01 5 38,i ~ SALES 921.86 108,954:47 . 1,352,332.39 1,352,332.3_9.· ~t==- 759~, . ~ JmKSOURSE 1,833.14 {1,833.14 7 766.00 287.24 . . f 2<.000.00 I i2.23a51 I 485.16=± s2i:!~.~~ - - · _ · . . · . . . . 1,068.~ ,000.00 cs.114.46 (3,645.a_g 2.~.66 8 BK

· - 1~-- 7 ·_ 900 · 00 9 #12 HEL , . csJi::~ I 10 SAVINGS - I ~· . 40.000.00 11 7312 H GOLD . , . . I -,- ~40,000 .. oo ~0.000,00 1 -. ~.· . . I 12 JOABERT 9721 +~ .. . . ·==

·==

19.981 156.32 I 13 DIV 5.81. 130.53 156.32 rn·tNAT - -· : - ~~- ! . . . . 1. !_5~ . ~. ==+-~

.

. ~. TOTPllNCOMI( 39,713.88 109,241.1,. . 435,008,551 ~--+ 100 .• 204.41 M~,220.92 .· 486,29~925,742 . . o8

(576.8991711,348,842.SJ

(5,714.46 I -_J .- ~ _ -~

j

. 19 OUTGOING . . ~· J===- ~ . 20 .. -~· .. ----t· 18,770.70 21 TAX . 13,577.06. I ~· 9.soa.oo 1-.. 159,9:g73.79 . 178,744.49 ___ 178,744.491 2.2 ~. ----t. . 12 .• 0.00.00

. 20.000 .. 00 . .55 .• o. 85 .. oo. ·--. _

ss.085.06

23 BK ~. 3,579.82 . 12,081.64 s,714.46 4.ooo.oo -_ . . . .. · . . s,700.00 . . {1,BS3.14 24 UNRNO~~ 2,100.00 4,866:86 . / = . . 153,692.4g3 5,000.00 I 460,0 00 .oo 25. sAv1NGs . . 4ao,ooo'.oo . (521,401.51 (61,401.s1 26 JOABERT 9721 2,400.00 5,400.00 166,49;!.43 (40,000.00 12",492."3 ·~~ p0N1'0UR 2918 15,~.00 _112,100.00 .·. 120,000.00 . 50,000.00 110,000.00.··. 467!100.00 . . _467,1. 00.00

150~

29 HEL GOLD 7312 150,000.00 . • 150,000.00 ~~ ~L I -~ . . . =t=2.,000.00 . == - - -=+== . . 36,239:~7 I ~8;239.571 . . (7;950.00 . . 30,289 .. 57 + . . 50.00 • 10,759.37 I -~ ' .. 1~~.427.50 _32!CONSTRUCTlCN1· . 23;052.531 - 23,952.53 .. - 1 I 3,ooo.oo 10,809~37 33 OFFICE EXP . : .. 10,809,37 __ ' .----;;n-nnf-. . 34.··TR~l.L7318 · ~20,000.00 . . 100.000.ool· 123,0.00.00 - -. . ti.000.00

_ -r--: +-. .

:

+ ___ _ i_ _ . ·-r- 35j8ANKCHAR~ES/ . ~+-- 170.00_ _ .. 190_.00. _ _ _J___ 190.00j -+- ROFESSIQNAL . , t== ==± _ . . . = .+= ===±=.

i=--

.• . . ~~RANCE~±= I - I =± ±==-±- . . 240.ooo.oof- _240,00o.ooi :~~

. .. . .

~40.000.00 l!W~ . I 39,450.52

. .... <20:00 ~9.49 10.000.00~~0. ,242.30 ~.29_2.57 I ~.925.127.91 ~76,89917 1.348,228.74 ·43 DIFFEREN~E 263.34 (54,470 .. 94 (10,000 .. ooi __j_.. 64,82.1.8.1 24,021.38 (24,021.36' 614p - - · 614.17. ii 0.00. _··--2·. 614:17 24,021.38 _ . l 44 INITIAL CK AMO 0.00 263.34 65,065.15 10,614.21 0.00 614.17 614.17 m BANK BAl.ANCE ~ ... ENDCKBALANC. __ ·--iss:-3_4 65,08_6~15 1.0.614.21

614.21 ?4,021.38 - ------S-.14.17·1 (000, 65,08~.15 2-4,021.38 t= ' ~~-00 .. . 263.34 10,614.21 61_4.21 . - - · · 0.00 I o.oo. - OITION .. 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 . 614.17 __ 61417 · - - 0.00 0.00 1 4 . .. . . . .. · - - __ .ERR *81 ·-- HELVETIAF '*LCON ... Bank cfutrge Interest Balance 0ei>0s1t Date AMOUNT .... Payee ;who WtREINCOI CLASS ··- ' -·~ .... - --~- - -·-- --- .. .-·-. --····~- -1onainal Original 2010 .. 19259.60 ADAM- 17827.60 01/01 1432.00 TAX - 16395.60 01/01 1432.00 TAX -·- -· ···----· 14963.60: 1432.00 TAX 01/01 ---- ~~ .. -- .. ~- 13531.60 01/01 1432.00 TAX - .... - .. .. -·--- 12099.60 . '1.432.00 01/01 TAX - ...... - - --~- ··---- 10667.oo 01/01 1432.00 TAX -- .• ------- 1432.00 TAX 01/01 9235.~ ... .. .. .. 7803.60• ! 01/01 1432~00 TAX -·· -- ... - . .. . I 6371.60 01/01 14~2.00 :TAX - .... ---· +- : 4939:60 1432.00 TAX 01/01 .. - ·-- 1432.00 , TAX··· . 3501~6cf 01/01 -· .... -···- ... 2075.60 1432.00 1TAX 01/01 ' - ... - . -l-- -·· 2075.60 01/01 TAX I -- -· ---· .. 02101 1432.00 TAX I 643.60 I ......... __ - i ·-· .. ····- 02101 TAX 643.60

--- 643.60 02101 l .. ··- ·-· 03/01 154.70 lAX 488.90 -·

I '" 488.90 03/01 - i -- ... ---·- I ···- 04/01 488.QO .. -· ···-· BK TAX CEF TTOBEX 19668.26 ADAM i 17577.34 041'27 2579.82 TAX . 16577.34 04/21 1000.00 9721 .... , .. -·- 286.00 UNK 12000.00 TXPMR 4863.34 05105 --- 4863:34 .. ~D -

.....

ERR 4863.34 ·- .. -·9721 3863.34- 07/01 1000.00 -- 07/01 3863.34 . - ... ··- -- --··· 07f01 3863.34

- 1000.00 BK 2863.34; 08/01 -

-

-·-- 08/01 ·· __ ~---·- --~·-· 2863.34 2863.34 09101 --- - - . ·-·- ·- ! 09/01 2863.34 ·- ---- 2100:00 ! JOABERl g, if ·-~. 10/01 163.34 ...... _ ' : ... --·- 11/01 163.34 - ··-· S00.00 UNK 12101 400:00 9721 263.34 ·--· ---··· -···· 12101 263.34 - - --- ---- .. 39450.52 ERR 39713.86 197533.74 .. I -· ·-··-·· 263.34 i 39713.86 39713.86 --- .. ··-· ·-- " ... ; -, 38927.86 income ... ... - ; --·-·----- ... ·- ... -· 786.00 UNK : .. - . .. .BK ADV : ; ·--. - ... ... - -·-~ .. ·-· 39713.86 TOTALINCC 'ME i '

------- ... -- ··-···· ····-·-· ~. ..j_,_ ... ___ -- .. .. -·· --···· ~-· EXPENSES } - - - - . . : . . ... --

-·--- ' ·- .... ,_ 21350.52 TAX - . ·- 12000.00 JR i ·- I ·- ---· UNK i . -··-· ... 5100.00 9721· ... -·- ·-· .. ··- ---·--- 1000.00 BK ··~ ... ·-- -···~·. -~-- -· ·-·· -- .. .. . ... -··· ., 39450.52 ---- ·-· -- ··-· · - - --39450.52 •···-· -0.00 ----·· *82 HELVETIA t "LCON Date AMOUNT Payee WIRE INCOI CiASS Depo$it Who Bank Charae interest Balance ! 0.00 0.00 - - · ___ ,__ _ _ _ -+----+------+------·=o.oo · ------+--- 0.00 1--20-. -1-1-+---- · - - t ' - - - - · - - - j f - - - - - - -1 - ·· 0.00 Origiri81 Original 263.34 l - -= " " - - ' - -1 · - · · - - -+ - - - · - .. · · -+ - - - - - -+ - · - - - -1 - - - · - - - j f - - -= - - - +~>-----+- .. _.___ __ ~

01/01 263.34 .........,,0-1/0=-1 -+----+-----·+------<-----<>------ + - - - - -+ - - - - -+ - I 263.34 · - - - - - - - · · · - -+ - - - - -+ - - - - · · · - - - - - - - i - - - - · - · -+ - - -+ - - - - -o -1 263.34 01/01 ,_____ __ ....__ ___ -+--··-· ~--+-----+-----+---···-·--+--~ - - -+ - - - - -< - - -+ - - - - - -< 01/01 263.34 01/01 ' - ------i--.,,2=0-1s"""2-.. 1"'"3+SA:::-:-:-l=E,---·-+-------+---=20415.47 01/01 ~--!----··· ·--+-----t-··20415.47.

I - - - - - ' - - - · · • ' 01!01 ?0415.47 -+----->----'--·· -->----+---·--~----+-----+--- .. -0-1/_0_1 _____._ ____ __,_ ___ __,_ _____ -+-----t-----l>------+,-------t--· . 20415.47 - - - - ' -+ - - - - - -> · · - - - - - - - - - - - · · -+ - - - - -+ - - · · · · - -+ - - - - - - - ---+----+-···

01/01 20415.47 h-='--'---+-----1-------l------l·-···---------+---.. -+ - - - - -< - - -+ - - - - - - - -= -1 01101 20415.47 01101 2().415..47 i !-------,'--+-----+--- ---+------+--·- · · · -+ - - - -+ - - - - -+ - · .. - · - - -+ - -

01/01 20415.47 i--.,o-11-=o-1--+----+---~-----+------1----',-------+--·-- --+----+ - 20415.47 '-ow=-1~1-----200-00~.oo~+. J~L~R----+---··· · · --+-----1--- · · -+ - - - - -+ 415.47 ·· · ------r---+-

-··----+---<··- 9721 02/01 400.00 10.47. 15 .. 47 ~1--+--'-'-'-'--+----1------·~-----<-----+------+---- -----+------+-----+-·· ···---+-----+-----1· · - - - - - -+ - · ·--+----=-' 03/01 15.47 i 0310_1_+------·+-----l--····---t----__.._----+-------r--------+--+-----o1=5.~47="' "287:34 ~i:r . 04101 302.81

'--04/0--1 ----+------· ~-----+-------·-+----t-----i--~---1c-----+-- 302.81 ' - - - ' ' - - - ' - -+ - - - - - ! - - - - - - - - -+ - - - - ..... ··- : - - -+ - - - -+ - - - -+ - - - - · - · - 302.81

04/01 ' ~.o:-=51i-=-01.:....-1-----···+---------···· ·· --+----1----+-, - - - -+ · · · · · - - - - - -+ a02.a1 i-..:o=s=to:..:.1--1---------1--- -.....!-----+----- ·-· - - - - - - ·····-r-----1--·· --+------030~2.-=-0711 302. 81

0510.1 0&01 - · - - - - ! - - - -+ - - - ---+---"-t--------+----30~2.-81_, 302.81 05/01 ' . ·-06/-01_.__ ___ _,_ ___ _._ ... ---·--....----+----+----- 302.81~ 07/0 . ..,..1--+---~------+---···· .. -----1.-2-11~9---5_.,..99--1-=A...,.,,S----+ ·- -·-,10-_-oo,..,_.... _ _.,... __ 21488 70 07/01 -l------+-----1------<----= - - - - -+ - - · · · .. 21488.70 07/01··· ------<--··-·--+-----+----- -----11------··--1-----+-·· .. 21488.70

J.._:0:.:..7/0::.:;..:..1--1------I------ .... ___ _,_ __ -+ - - - - · · · - - - t - - - - · - - -+ - - ! - - 21488.70 ,__0-7/0~1--+------+-----+---· ~-----1-----;c------t----·· -···--. ---t--~2-14~88-. 70 l---o-'-1-10.:..1-+----+----------"-,----+----1----+, ··----1------r----2,...,1,..,.488==-c.1=-10 i--:0:...71-=0.:..1--i------+-----+-----+-·-······-·i-E-R---+--··-·-·--+----·i __ 21~:.?Q.

21488.70 ~0:.....81:..:.0..:...1 --l------·--+------1---··--·-+------+-----·~.----+--------r--- 1-'----"o'--81-0-1 -+---40-00-_-00~Y-N-K-NOW--.N--+- -· .. ·--+---1---2-191-5-.49-<-E-RR_O_R_· - • ·----=-10::--.0=0-r; - - - ... - 39394.19

09/01 ' : 39394.19 • .- ···--+----~---t---~f----••·r·---t-----+••----;---;o==-::-=< ~· , 09iu1 39394.ll:t J........:1'--0/0~1-+~1-5-00Q---.Q0-+---~29-1-8+----+----1-----1------+---- -T----t----c=24J--o=94:-::--:.1=19 ^[1] ~1-1;~0-1 -+--..,.5"""00~0--=.oo=+--=97=2,._.1-+----+----1------1~--···- ..... - - - -+ - - 19394.19

12/01 -+-----t------=2~28~45-:48-t-o-NA~~F=G=---+----+----1-4-22-39-.6=1 ^[1] i--:1.::;:21'.,:;c0"-1-+----+-----+-----+----+~22=545'--""-_·48~. ~NA""'~~F='G~--+ · · · - - -+ - - - ! · · · · · 66085;15 1------=...:c....-1--------l'--··-· ----+------l---"-

2013 ! -----t---·- .- ·----;--------- .. - - - - -+ - - - -+ - - · - 1--~"--1~ .... ---.. · - - - -+ - - - - · · 2013 1-----'--+-----+-~----~-------lf----+-----+·----+----··-·t-----r-----·· . ----- 2013 22360J~.O.+----·==o=.~oo::===o:;.oo~ .... _..,,1()9~=24~1-.e~1~ ___ -:::_-:::_-:::_-:::_-:_o-._oo-~ ... _-___ __,_ 2~0~.o-o+---0.~oo-=-+----_-_-< c---2=0'-'-13=--if--fs.400.00. INCOME -----+-----·-~ INCOME 108954.47 UNKAOD: 287:~,...,;----_._ __ ·-·---1----+-">----i _________ _,_ ___ _,_ ___ _._T_OtAC. 109241.81 · - - - r - - - - - · f - - - -+ - - - - - -+ - - - - - - ' - · · · · · · --+o-R=IG=·-,NA~. --2=53=-_~34.,-1----·--+------r--1-------1 --'------+=T=pT=Al,...,. IN 1~505.15. - - - - - - - -1 - - - ·-·· - . . - - - - - - · · - ,___ -t-----------+-,----+----;--~-----..,------;-----+ ------1---··- ~-----'------+--- ~·---'------4--- - · · - - · · · -+ - - - ~-----+-------+---

-- - · - ··--+----- ~-1-----+--- · · · · - 1-- • . . . . : - - - ' - - - - - · · - -+ - - - · --+----· + - - - - i ~···I --;.-,~~-+-'="==~c+-----r----··-· -+'------ ··--+--- .... .. *83 HELVEl'i4. .FALCON ·- .. Date Checl< No Payee ·WtREINCC CLASS Oeposif Who Bank Cha Interest Balance r---;-- I .. ··- ... -- .. - - · OriQinal Original 2012 65085.15 01/01 .A 20442.82' 85527.97 ··- ·-- I 108362.92 22834.95 01/01 'F - 01/01 A 28030'.65 10.00 136383.57 -- ' -·· ~ 01/01 F ; 47205.62 10,00 183579.19 01/01 - - 1694.28 9,721.00 181874.91 10.00 .. --- 01/01 2870.-48 9,721.00 17900.(43 ... -· ' 01/01 43919.65 9,721.00 135684.78 ' . .. ... 01101 257.82 9,721.00 134826.96

I

·- ... - 01/01 712.39 : 9, 721.00 134114.57 - 1237.81 9,721,00. 01/01 132876.76 ·-· -- 01[01 4000.00 9,721.00 128B76.76 -· 01101 12000.00 9,721.00 10.00 116866.76 - . 01/01 14000.00 2,918.00 102866.76 ··--- ·A 30414.16: 02101 10.00 133270.92 ---- ! 02/01 F 23548.50 10.00 3850.00 4412.00· 160659.42. ... 02101 4000.00 9,721.00. 158860.42 .

.. 03/01 150000.00 7,312.00 6659.42 - - 03/01 1500.00 2,918.QO 5159.42 ·- 04/01 F 47104.77 10.00 52254.19 - - - · · 04/01 A 28457.90 10.00. 80702.09 .. .. ... " 04/01 6600.00. 2,918.00 74102.09 --·- -- --- 'F 05101 47153.62 10.00 121245.71 -- - ·- 05101 F 23616:86 10.00 144852.57 ' ' " 23616:86 23633.49 .. 051'01 F 10.00 168459.43 . .. ··-' ... 05/01 F 10.00 192082.92 .. 3000.00 9,721.00 05/01 189082.92 -· -·-· 21058.35 06/01 10~00 210131.27 .. 06/01 5000.00 9,12·1.oo 205131.27 ···- 06/01 20000.00 9,721.00 20000.00 9121:00· 205131.27 --------- 06101 ~ 20000.00 .. 9721.00. - · -- 20000.00 9!721.00 205131.27; .. 06/01 20000.00 9,721.00. 185131.27 -- 07f01 150000.00 2,918.00 3513127 -· ... . .. 07101 35131.27 ·- --. - 07/01 35131.27 - --- 08101 5000.00 9,721.00 30131.27 ! -·· .. 08/01 9500.00 JLR 4000 20691~27 - . - -- - . .. 09/01 4077.06 JLR TXPMR 16514.21 , -· ·- -- 09101 10000.00 9.72LOO 4100.00 4412.00 10614.21

-· -- .. ... 10/01 10614.21 ·····- · - ~ - · · · - 11/01 10614.21 - -·-·. .1.0614.21 12/01 - .. .. 10614.21 12/01 I - 47950.00 489369.49 387116.55 170.00 ... .. - .. ' --. . . . ' .. -. ----- - . ····· .. ----- - -· M7.111J°!55 income .HElVETI 4.41200 initial JOABER 153692.43 9,721.00 --~.ooo.ocf 9721.00 - - - 112100.oo· 2,91a."60 7,950.00 4412 HEL HELGOL - . •· - ... 13577,0S jj_R:--~--- 435,068.55 TOTAL .. · - - - -· I - -·· 150000.00 7.312.00 ~89.369.49 SPENT

·- 170.00 BC -.

I

.. 489369.49 TOTAL E P .. I'" ......... 9721 489;539.49 TOTAL SP NT -1

- - - - · ·

f i (54,470.94 BAL loK 65,085.15 INITIAL ~ .. _J

i

. .. I 10,614.21 BANK ~n:~EMENT_L__ I

I

.... ~-·· - ---r--·· ---, *84 - - -+ - ---~! · · - - •••"••'·-~ .. "•• --~ u•'- •• - D0p<l_sit_· ~"Y_tlo __ B_;:1_nk Char_~ lnteres ~Balance _ ~

ERR

ERR' - -1 - - - - -+ - : i--- --·· -· , - ·-----· ; - -- - '-· ___ ERR. _.--l 2013 ---+-=OHglnal ·-- 9~inaf=-= ____ . BKAHN 01/0~1--+-- ·10014.21

· ·9121 I 01/01 · ·--:--·5oottoo - -+ - - ·-: -5614.21 --+------........... +:-·==-=--=--=------ + - - - crrnw I 561421 1 - - - - - - . - 02101 5614.21 <Wo-.,-1 ---+-- - - -+ · - - - · - - · ! - - - ! -

- -+ - - - - - · ··-· 5614.21 ·- 62101 - - - - · - - - ·-561 .. (21' - 02/01 - ·----- ... . -·---·------ -· -·- --~ 5614.21"! - - - · · · - - - - - - -+ - - - -1- ; .. :~~-- .. ---+--56 .21 I 02101 . ·-·--,- . - - - - - ••. ·-03701

+ - - - -

5614:21 __ ,_ · - - - - - · · - - - - -+ · - - · - - +----- -+--se'-"-14.21 03101 - · · - - - · · - - - t - - - - - · - · - - - ·- 5614.21 04/01 --+-·---..--- _____ ....._.. ___ · - · - - - · - - - · - - - · · · - · · - - · · .____, __ 5614.21 04/b=--=-1---'-- · - - ·····--·----0014.21 - - - - - · - - - - - · · - - ! - - 04/01 -- - - - - - i - - -+ - 731"8. 2614.21 05/01 3000~00 - - - - - · . - - - - · · - - - , 65Rf1- 2614~21- --05/o1___. __ - - - - - - - - - - - - - ····+----.. ··· 2614.21'

- -+ - - - --+--·-·· . - - - - · -+ - - - r· 03101 --2·s1·4.2f ' c - - - 2614.21' ··----· ·--·-·· j----l--···2614.21 04/01 ···-2614.21 - - -+ - - - - - - - -·--------+--- 04127 - - · ·---------- 04/21 --261~'-2-1 ·wos ,

- - t - - - -+ - - · - · · · - - · 2614.21 OS/Os ·. ·--. - -+ - - · - - - - - · · . - - - - - - · - - ! - 2614.21 ERR-, --- --·· - - - - - - - - .. --~26"14.2f

-····- .... __ ,.. ·'-~-- ~?!Q1 - - - .. 261421 .. -;r- - -· . _ _._ ___ 26:W~21 07/01 1-. 07~1 - - ------ - - - ----- - - - - - 2614~-21 I - - - -< i 08/01 2614.21 ; 08101 ---2~oo=ct0o ~TRAIL7318_., - 614.21 1 ~~:~ OK_. -±. 3 ^[1]

0~~2/9~/0~_g __ 1 11 ~- - _1Q~O _____ o_ 001- .. --- .~·· -- + - - - - - - l ~

_

- ORlGlffAL 10614.21. - --~ - · - - - , ___ ...... ~_--_-_-_.-._: ~~E .. ...

1

-- ·--· -~·-- r-:-~ ~R ~~~L~tk.~ViNG- -=-_;_~ C

-• -

*85 ~ 20 i} -- _ HELV _ _ . -= _ = -t _ _ J 2_5000.oo O ~g::·~ -~:!'~ -·---1- -~------ - --- .. /06 - - - - · - - - 25016.24 '09/07 ---- ---- - - - · - - · - - - - . - - - - - - --- :25016.24 -·2501624 "10100 -- - - · - - - - - · - - - - - . - - - --

- - - - - · - - - - - - · · . ---- - .. - - - - - -- ---- ! - - - -+ - - - - - - - - - - - - · · - · " · · · - -- 05/09 - - - - ---1 -- ~- · __ · - coN-fouR -~-- ·11•00 --= _,_:

- ·_ -- _- _ ·2111•001 c - - - - _ _ m~:-~!' -_ _ 50000.00 _ _ --_ _ _ _ : _ _ --

CONTOUR

--0.88 07/12 - - - - - - - - - 161140.95 07112 - ·--- CONTOOR 35000.00 ·--- · - - - - - - ' ------ . - 52.87 ' - 126193.82 CONTOuR .. 07112 25000.00--- - - - · - - - - '--· , ___ -

~193.82 01112 - - - - ··--··- - ----· · ·----- · - - - - - - - - · - - - - - ~193.ei !Q8J13 ___ ,.____ ··--· - -.. --.-CHECK 200000.00 ----· --301193.82 soooo:oo · --- - . 35119ia2 .. --.: 08/13 . -----·--· CHECK .. - --IDEAL--··· -~0000.00-· - - - · · -·- · - - - ·----.. -~ .. ----~·-·-·1ffi93.82 ,)8/13-. 09/14 -~--------- ----- .. ·-- - ---- '

-11-1193.82- BkAHN -·-- 1000.oo ~- 112193.82 09/14 -- -·--------·-------- 09114 - fo9193_a:Z- --CHECK-·- . - ·3000:00: ----·---·· - - · . - - - . 09i14 ·-9193.82 ----i-RA1_L___ 100000.oo . --·----. - - - - .. ---· - - 09/14 CHECK___ 8000.00 ···-- 1193.82 · 09114 · - - - · - - - - - · - - - ·- ·1193.ai.

_ - - - · ====· -=·~~ ·--- s3.oo 1oi16 -1239.v7 - - - - - - - - - - .. 48.0o ·- so.7s 10161 ---~=-- --~~.· ---

CttEC~-

··---o.oo - __ BKAt\N_---= 1011.f? 53.00 ------~==" -- 110ro1 ~T~~ ~-51 -~~i~- ------·---- ·-;;; .. 10/01 0.00 -- -·--- 0.00 ----=--=--~

1W01

QOO --- ·---

- - - - - - - - · · - - - · .. · · - - - · - · - ~:g~- - -t-·---f~~ .. ~6~~~:: ~N~EREST --·--- 1 ~:~~ --·-~- ~-- - -~---: _f eK-=t ~::: ~ -- 48~2"~~ ' - - ~tt- c _ __J_ __ .________ -~=i"E ---=-.. -- E .. __ ......L_. ___ -.--"'"- ____ -·-·--- ,

-~

• ... ' "• • - - -+ - . - _r_-. ~ '-.. ;·----:- --·· ··-- -·-·-·· ···-- *86 HELVETIA RI :IFCU , ... ·- - -··· -· ···--. l RBFClJACci UNT

j

Deposit Who ·i:fank Cha 1 Bafance-- ~~·· Check No Payee Date WIREINCOM ---· ·-- --·· ·- .. . ·-· -·· ··- ··- . -·-·- -ERR -

--- -·--- -- ····· + - - , . - - ~ .. - -~· .. -·-· - 2012 ----+-q~gin ()rigin_a_i_- + - . -+ - - .. ·-- · - ·-· ·--· 23564271 07/01 23564-2 7

- 23579_9 3 ·-·- ·---~ 07101~- 47144.20 .. -·· .... .. ()8J01 2883{ 66 75975.86 08/01 ; --25000.bO CCLC 9975.86 09/01 -- ________ ,, ___ 23533.4 5 74509.31- -. -4459.31 -1001.00: 50.00 : 09Jo,j' ;srATECOt:ff.R6Lla; ·----+--69959.31 1oo~:QO I . 09/01 BMK FEE WALL 4500-00 -()9/01 PEST ··--·320.03 1003.00 2.3535.7 93175.01 ---- · · · · - - - - · - ·- ·-- 09/01 . -·

9506.00 JLR 83672.82 ·-- 09/01 25000.00 CCLC 58672.82 ! - ·- --53672.82 10/01 NEW LEAF WALL 1005.00 5000~00' -- 10/01 NEW LEAF FENCE 5211'2.82 1500-0Q+ 1006-00 r-f0/01 20000,00 CCLC 32172.82 --

-

-·· - .. r-10/01 -~----- 10000_00 CCLC 22172.82 ---68326.38 SAVINGS 22153_ 56 11/01 24000.00 - - · · · ---

-- -1210-r--- 40000-00 CCLC 28326.38 i :n10f-·•s-tRucr10N LAsbR 4305:00' 1004.00 24021.38 ··- 145183.03 6021.00 145198.6 0 24000.00;

TOTAL~

- ··-··- -· .. ; .. -- ... ·- ... [9TAU: 120000.00 cci..c ' : initial- -- - ·-· ---~ 0 income 15625.03 CONST 145198.6 o deposit· -

.... -· -· - - - - - - j 9508.00 JLR 24000.0 ·-- 1 DIV ----· - -__,.....__-.. -.. . - -+ - - · - - - .•.. :re - ......... .- -··--- t---- .. -·· . ··- 169204. 50.00 off ~~------+-~~--+- _ 5.81 ~I ··--- -· ...... ·-· -··· - · - - - - - -·- : 145183. -- --·--· ---- c----· ·- 24021_ . - """'~± · - - - f· - - ·-· ·-·-· 38 balance · - - -+ -+ - - I 2402f~ - ·-- - - -+ - -···-~ i .. ··-- ·"' • ..

•

*87 foa~te-P~-e -- · ---~~-t ----~ - - - _ __._ __ _ --·-- -·---~--- -- ·--- ,__

.. ...

*88 JOABERT ACCOUNT *89 '-=-.R · ... ·.1.SAV~GS .1TOTALS. r~-----+ ----+r;3~ l2012RB . ! - I . j . " . . 61 SALES ' .. . - r - - " rt;~.sou~;309.e2. I 1~ I ·~· ·· · . _ ·" ~9.12688 (5,t59.19f13,167:6!

I

~ l I .

!

<ooo.oo. (500.00 1 r · s.oco.oo.:- . . . . ., 126,492 .. 4~ (12.6,492.43. ~ 4412 .. H·E· L. 5,4'JO.oo.;" 113,692.431 I I " 2,400.C(.fl . ·-+-· 10,000.ool- _J SAVlW.GS . . ' I• 20.oooooj czo.ooo ... ·oo _ _ J. 10,oco.oo~ (~1.4.73., =J

1.·3·1. 2H GoLo ·.

! . I ^[1] @~?teERT97 1 ,· , 414.7l --j . _ 4147_3 ;~j:JNo* I s,(l)O.oo' ··~-· .J : · .·· · ·$_ 1 s,oonool . [ 5,00GJaj ^[1] ,

.

:mT61~.· . 6,705.6:2:! 25.221.261 •2~ 15.000.00!··

1

· E . · . m"""ll4l('53.366.35J. 1.7.667:~ ^[1] · .. I I ==-J ;~/o~_TGOING. _ j ~ /- . . _ __ - . =!==- ~. _21 TAX~. .. 3,442.61. 6,171.~3,316.82 9,199.271 ~· ~~ =+

I !00 .02-t="'OC.(D I . ~i===-. 24,= I 600 001 24,000.0?.I 72,,1·30· ..... 34.. . . . '· _ 72,130.3{) ·-==\ I 5!E59.191

~: ~~~~~~N I 5,95€.1~ I (5S59.19' . I .. ~~ ~2=9r c~ . --±=- ·: ~· ~~:oo

.4.ooo.®

ti

1.<J00.001 . 29 HELGOLD7 __ -_ 1,000.0<?_ (20000.00X (19iooo.ro_· -1 -==---

_ _

_· .

1

. E- ~- 53,90s .. 25_: (414. 73 30 HELRBFCU . - 31 '4412 HEL j__ - _ . (126492.431 (126'.-492.-\13'

I I ' .

!

32 CONSTRUC1}__ 1 } 53 .9 - 53,9 1 ~-~~~s ~.•22 __ 31 2a,320- ,c~ 13,328.02 r 261.~9 I - , ' 33 oFFc. e __ ex.PJ 4,394-. .sa. l_ 34 TRAIL 7318 ·... ··-~ t== ^[1] I r 35 BAN< CHAR.. 10.00 30.00 _- _ . 261.791 3009 191.iOI 1 168.10 U97.00 1,565.10! . 1,565. 0: . 38 PRCfESSIO~ . I 1,729.53 'I l?ti ENG

. - - . 1,4~::;2 1~729.53.. 263.211 " . . I

.

rJS· INSURANCE . _ .. _ _ · _ 7,692.30 ! · _ · I 7,692:~ -_ ~57.:t: 3,962.so j 2.s11·~001 : j\um · i=:5s30 _ . I 'to_ }"AL _ E ~ TOl .. AY·_ ~ a,mo9a·" 2•.il8ti.l 111,257.l8 I 29,:!74.29 J I 112,ilouo c15,l,$S1 .62j 10,431 .. 15- J

. .

I . ~- . ~7~.46~ (414.73) 12.~49.~8 1 (14!~74.29 ~ 43"DIFFERENCE (1,38536~ " 1,140.41 1,800 . ..J9 I 14,€50.27 (}.769.-l6 44 INlilAL CKA~ 2,04544/ 275.981 2,045.44 360.08 . I 2.045.44l 45 .ENOCKBAQ_'66o.os_ j_ "1.~00_ .49· 14,650 .. _2_1_ ~J5.98 (1. 38.751 275.~Sl . j 275.98

!_. . -_ " . . . 1~1~ANKBALA~0.-08_ ~,800.491 14,650.~~;,ea_ 1:~1CONDITION __ .n~, :i " o:~o.oo! - -~- ·[ 275.98 J--275.98. --+-

I

. (138.t~rQ.\lJ D.00 I, l .JOABERT. FALCONTOTA[s··- · ·· ·1 -- ······ 1 [--.. ---.··=·~~-~~_ .. -·_ .... _ _, 201_0_F _ ____,,_20_·1 __ 1_·F·--i~i 2-0-12_F __ --_+2-0-13-F--+-2-0-12RB , 2013Ri!_ · 1TOTALS:~ ....

.: INCOMJ:

~-------;.-- ... - ... -- .... · · - - - -+ - - - - - - - ! - - - -+ - - - - - - · - -+ - - - ···- - .. _____ - -----<-·-- ... ,,_____ ---·-- - · · - -+ - - - - I SALES UNKsOLIRSE __ 19, 1?£?.88 BK--··

... 126,492.43 4412 HEL " ... ?.400.00 10,000~0........__ .. ·_·--_· .. =--· -·---·--- 20;060.00. SAViN_G_S_· _ _..___, /Jl-~· H l:JOLD - - - - - - -·· - -·- -·-- 10,000.00 J0ABtRT 9721 ___ .. __ 414)3

5~0-00~ ... --00-+,-----.. .. __ ,. ______ _ 414~73 -5,000 .. 00 ALAMO *90 TOTAL INCOME "l_G,o(Jti~-00.,....,:. ,___ 2~~-1.0Q. 1!:!.C-,~07.1~= - - -+ - - __ .17.Yl'.l4 04 ~ .. __ ,,_ --·---·- .. - ---

............ · - - - ! - - - - -+ - - - · - · " .. - - - - - - · · . ... --·---·. ---~-.· ....... ___ _ (3;#2:§1 'i"AX (6, 171.64 . (53 ,316.62 (72,130~34 -.. :·_..J.?.~. 000. 00 JR ----·· . ·--·- +--~-,-!---{?~ 1 000.00 BK (500.00 (500.00

' UNKNOWN __ __,__{!:>~, 9-offT9 - -+ - - -... ,_ ... __ . --··~··· l SAVINGS .. ~---~---·------- -- -- - -+ - - - - · .. ····· · - - - -+ - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - · 'JOABERT 9721

- - - -+ - - - - - - -· ··- - - - · ... -~---- . (4 000 00 - - -1 - - - - - -.. - . ·- - CONTOUR 2918 ....... - - - - - - -+ - - - - - - - - :~j4',000.00 1 (1,ooo:Oo} · -- • +-.--'-f1~:0~00:001 .~----····-~-----· ·-~~- HELGoLD 131s -~--+---\---:-- ___ ' -+-----·· .. .P __ . CONSTRUq~_O_N+---c-~·. ·- .1... .. .. OFFICF EXP H.394:88: (7:922.31 . (28.~?_Q..04}. (13.a2a,02 . "'"'·-+--- .. (?_3-.~1)5.25~ ·fAAil731a··· -BANK CHARGES

.. --..i PROFESSIONA,....,...1-+---

AUTO · · · - - -

· - - - . - - - - - -

ENG

. ---···· · · - - ' " - · - - - - .. TOTAL ·-·----+-~(1 __ 7?.!..003.so (8,090.98 '_:_(2·(-080:85 (111_,257,38 (29,_~7iL29 TOTAL 1 .... ... ...

1

-~~~E iNCOl Clfl!J!l !~It _ WtiO ~ iJOARftT.-P"1-c~N : ~:nkC~_~!]lnte~E.J;ll~~~~~-] .,. ____ r - · F= _111.!0UNT ~are"~..

ERR _'.__ _____ E.RR~ __ /- __ .. --------~=~--- ----- ---, .. -- ______ -~~t~ dngioal .. -~~: -·- ---- -~~:.: --oji01 1320,90 AlBERTUESTf TAX .J_ 5000,00 4412 ------ -- ,, -----· 18329.37

Jf3~00 RB AUHJ , --- ------· ··1iS01tf31

O~I01

--45s:sg CAP . r------.,-·-+-~-+-------+·--- ""17557.78 02101 EXP 02iOf-- --· 7320;62 ALBERT UESTI TAX- .. ----- i .. ------- 10237.16 02101 --- -- 313.00 i RQ l\UTO . ~- . . 0,024.16 ..... EXP- . ------------+-----,8='="'94i[69 02101 · · - f - 975A71 CAP

. 02/01 "'1"2""'s-_o,...,,o+B-EXA-· _......,_.-R----l=TAX---+---- 8820.69 s13.oo RB ___ ·- · asof69 Atiro · · 03101

-+----+--- *91 4811.93 CAP . ----· EXP 03/01 3695.76 ! _,_A_U_T-.0-+-----------•····· ~··--·---- - - - -+ - - - 04/01 313~00 RB ·--·· 3382~W

31 f5.23 CAP- . . --------267.53: 04101 EXP _ .!l! r _____ zy.s3 >--04l0 __ 1 --+----J.~0:_-00-+-5-AN-K----+-5-C--+---- . _ ... ---o-~-=-...,_"=-·•iii~~-+-----t- 5000.00 :"f312.00 ! 05/01 325.00 TCEQ TAX 4912. 53 --=g~=:=-,-~c....--+---=~=~;;-'i~=,~g=._1-";e..... --------i?'·_-~=~~·:+-----~~~~~-- 7a12 00 ! ----~+-~-------+------~i~=-~~::-=;=-' ··-osiiH .. ............ . . -·· .... -- --·1649.3i 1427.65 CAP EXP

7336.38 ~-07~/0~1---1---3-13-.00-+-RB-~----·--+-A-U~T___,O_ - - - -+ - - -_ __,____ ____ ·- -: . 01ro1 lm;iJ)ff CAP EXP · '->--- .· • · .. --- ·-· ----1·--0--.,-0-.1--<3 . --- --6006-:73 j Q?_IQ1 --1450.00 CAP EXP - --- . --- -- : 08/01 4693.73l 313,00 RB AUTC ----- - - - - - - - - - - - r- 08101 45iAu"

104-.75ALBERT.iJ"i;Sii TAX . t 09101 313.00 .RB ... ~--·----_"---ct-.oA""UT"=~c=1------+-------t----·--··--·····--1 .... 4275.98 .. -· -- --···------- -----4odo.O() ~OONTOUR·---·-29ra -- -----------~---+----- - - . ..) ; 09101 275.98 ,,.- ~o9/<H . . . -- ...... ,. , ----- ----- ---~---~27-5-.98__,, ------------1 ---------------------------~------ --

u:i1111n

.~10:98; i 08/01 -- - --· ; ..... .. . ...... ----·-···-------- ------275.98. --- ·-21s:is- OS101 - - r - - - -__ , t - - __ ,1 - - - - - - - - - ..... ____ _[_ ___________ --·-· 09i«>""1·--;--2=s=a=7-4-:--.2=0:-t--------1--;,..,...,."*C"'.'" .... . . ,+ - - - - - - --(jg/(f1 .·- 9199.27 ORIGINAl START

TAX 14ss~~'= =~=_1_465~~2.T EXP -.. T13328.02 S312.00; 10000.00 ... : --- ...... · · ·--··-- Aifto .. · --~--2s11.oo . ___ - . 44121 5000.00 2916 ! Al\IV\. ,oo·. ·. . . ! .. ---- .... --·- .~.:--1~-"tUV-'--V-".--'-+----~-----~ =-::c--o=+---+-·-__j - - -+ - - - - - · - . - ...... , .... -··· ···----··--,- ··-·.--- BC 30.00 . TOTAL H 29650.27 - ... ., .. ------ - - · - - - - - - - - ----- ------~----- -- ------'-~· -~--=-..-l--+----~ ·SPENT 29374.29 '~ -~-----"-r------.-J=o=A=s=1:ft==T=FA=L:--:c=o=·N:.---------~=~~~~ '---~·-='-·_:_·~~~ ~=~·- .... -.. ~ ... _-_ .. -.... ~, 2012 Bank c lntere Balance :_Payee _____________ ·-"-1---------AMOUNT Check TRANSFERS FROM i I s ROMO TAX RC TAX 2870.48 1194 2,870.4$ 1800.49 4412 --'------1---1--~---+-___:.--1---.-;"------"---+------ ,___ _ ____. _____ _ • S ROMO TAX Kl TAX 4391QR5 1195 43,9.1965 441?

1R004~

:·s·RoMo-tAX JD~- ---JR___ 2000.00 ___ Jt~- _, ____ .. __ 2_5,-'_.1._s2-+-· ___ 4 __ 41 __ 2 _____ -~-~----441_:69 __ I SROMOTAXRC TAX

712.39 1'197 712.39 4412 -441.69 1 *92 S ROMO TAX RC Tl\X 1109 1 ^[1] 237.91 706.12 4412 S ROMO TAX RC TAX 1237.81 1199 4,000.00 4412 3558.31 1------1--1------cc--+--~;._ .. ___ . -· _____ ,:.:_____c....--!---·-- ------~---1-~ TXPMR JLR 4412 14058.31 JR 1500.00 1200 12,000.00 1------+-----+----------.--+-----'>---'----~--------L-.--;...____ .. --- . -- --- NBP ENG 200:_66__,___1_31_3-1--___ ..____._ _______ ·----- ---·---- ~ 13657.43 i EXP 13657.43 CITY BANK 200.00 5640 .,,_____ -1 - - - - - -1 - - - - - - -+ - CAP l EXP 13176.41 481.02 1----~--·- --~----i----- .:. .. ·,.-----+----+----+-----+----+---+-----=-'--cc-~ CAP ^[1] EXP 192. 92 1 12983.49 · - - - - - · - - · . ....__-+-------- "·-·---=--::-:--::-::-+----,--,--,-+------+-----!-----+---+-,,_..,,-----,-I 12683.49 BRUCE KAHN : ENG 300.00 1201 I -- . C----· - - . -· .. --"·--.NBP------:--ENG .<'. - ·-·····- ·- 1264!. 33 • . 40.16 1202 - - 200.00 56411 4,000.00 4412 ! 30.75 CITY BANK EXP 16412.58 1----.,....,.--::'-c-:~~~-c--+----------=+----"t-----'--- ... - - L--.:.. EXP 6755. 75 ; 9656.83 CITY BANK --- -CITY BANK EXP 6111.12 --~-----------··· -- ... . ..... -- ·-. ------~--·--·--+-3-54-5.-71.c.....i _____ g~ :~~-~ · · ___ :~-~:· · ·--=-!i-=...:o'~-~.o...=c:~=-o..__ ___ _._+ ____ -__ =--- ------'--! ... -.... -..... - .. ----·-'-----'--·--'-_-_-_-~;~:1~·

313.00"-+·· ---+------l------1-----+---+---?R004Q ,---. RBFUC AUTO ·----clriBANK- EXP 86.0!} ·- ·-·····-·--·-·------········· -· ·- ·---~--·---i---+---2-604-.4--10 ---CITY-BANK ...... -EX_P ....... --8'-60-.94--'--1----1---------- .... -.. ---- 1743.46 -----'---+----1-------'-'-----~---+---~---j- 1~55 . .if6 IHS CONSUL TING l:NG 288.00 1316 ' 5;-Y"E=-... · EN~· ~G'---IN_E..,,._E-Rl-N-+--CE~NG-"-+--3~9-7.50--+- _,.f316 · - - - - -1 - - - - -+ - - - - - - - - - _ =·- 1057.96 I

NBP ENG 39.40 - .1~31-7-+------1--------4----- ' 1018.56 1 ,__ _____ ,___,____ __ ___._~____, ______ ·-~··--··----+-·---+---+---- . ,.J C03A TAX, 100.00' 1Hi2 , 916.~0, :--CIWBANR---~- EXP ! - 241.58 ----+-I -6-7-6:-98--i -29if37 --~---- -- --· , CITY BANK EXP; 386.61 ^[1] CITY BANK EXP ------l~r.u-9-1----+------!.--,- ·-- . ·- -~ ....... -+ - ; -~--:>2=-<· _ _ R_B_F_U_- c_ ... _._ .. _ .-l-A_U_T_0+--,_3_1_3_.o_o-1---- - ~---· __ ·· ___ .... _·-_-_- ----·-=--=--=--=--=--=-·=--=--=:,:======-·-_:~--:.·· . -46.52.

1

1- RBFUC 313.00 154.59 AUTO' -421.07 i NBP- -- -· ENG 1 __ 79.29. 1153 3,.000.00; 4412 2499.73 i liisl.J~NCE o~.~_A _ _.__Au_r_o-+--_s_19_.s_o_,___·'--11 __ ·54_-_ · ::~-------'------+----+_ .. __ ._ .. __ +_,.... __ _..1..::_98=-=o=.2=--13:

1980.23 i r----------·- .-.. -·-+-__ c_B~' ---+----+---s~.o~oo-· ·~oo_· ~-- 4412 .. _ .. . .. _ 6980.23 ^[1] 20,000.00: CB , 4412 ! 26980~23 20,{)0000· U12 ! 46980.2~ 1--------l--r.-'-_;RT--""".- t---------+--o.------+-··-··'"-~-L-- ---------=-~+----+---+--'c--~

CB 20,000.00' 4412 86980.23 ~---------1--c-==a-· +------+-! --t---(2-o-'-~o-oo-.-oo->i ___ 4_4--'-12-+-------+---l--4--59-a-o-.23---1 l----A..,,_,H----+-A-U_T_O+---a-1-a-.00-· •. -, -1-1.-66--"· 1----:...:...(2-0-,0-00-.0-0-'+)---4-4_1_2-1--.. ~-.-- --·-. ____ ,_ __ 26667.23;

--·-44:r2 t--C_H_A_S_E_B_AN~~KJLR JR 20,000.00' 1318 6667.23 i

I

.. 666tf87; ' -BANKCHARG EXP ' 1151 -- -··-·-·---1------+---6·.·35'···· .... Cl~F~B~ ~~--~ .. --+-;A_~X-~P-'--_~-+-· -----=-~~-;-:~-~+--·=:, =-~==-----------·-->- .. -.... -.. -.. --,-~--- ' --- ---~-~-~:E.-.-~ ___ ;~;~

..

··-·· l ,- CITY DAN~ c.xr I 1,0$6.Q2 4314.26 - - - -1 - - - - - - - - l - - · . I

4001.25

RBFUC AUTO! 313.00 r ---crrvBANK 3610.95 EXP ; 390.30 1MELOA CARRILLO -ENG : --l---~---+-- 60.00 1271 NBP ENG[ ·~-6-1-.1'--84--1-2-72--1----.....-....+-·-··· . 3489.77 ·e~.§ CONROLLE . TAX i 3239.77. :~!@.~~-. 1319_ .... _____ _ - ·----~39. ii" ! [-· .. . .. ···--- RBFUC AUTOi 313.QO\ ____ 5,000.00 7926.77 4412 ,- -c-rrv-·~aANK EXP , 2s14.53 ^[1] 4952.24 1 CITY BANK·-t-'E=o..X-=-P-+- --6..,.....98~.39~----+-·· ... J <1-.0,Q0;00_ ...... ___ 44_12--'-

. .

4-----t--14_25_3_.8--15 CITY BANK EXP ^[1] 1,700.00 12553.85 ·- .. ---.. --l.-----'--1--·- '· 12503:85 ;ono; 120; TATE CONTROi i F FXP

AUTO

*93 RBFUC 313.00 i ---··-1- ~- __ ".. 12190 85 • CITY BANK-·' EXP- -----·9tt[oor----------"---•- 112at1'.2s ,._S ROMO TAX RC TNf . -t3.86 1206 ... -- -- 11236.39 ·-·EXP --·414.'73 ---·-· 9721 11651.12 Auto ·· ··11aaa.12 RBFUC 313.00 CXP ....... -203<):.:54 .... ·~ ····--····--· 850? .·se

-- -·c·ITY BANK S-ROfvi:)'tJ\x RC i TAX 7312 · ·--- .... 590.00 1200 .... !~000~00 17917.stf ,...S~ROMOTAXRC ^[1] TAX , 16019.23 1,898.35---1269~ .. '"AuTo~313~oq ·- ·-- l ·--iiToe.23- ---~---Rf.il-uc ··----~ I -- EXP CITY BANK 742.96 ---: .. , -----· 14963.27 ,___._RBFUCf -- .. :AUTO 31.3J)O ... ·t· --···· ! 14650.27 . ·-------· 111,065.68 ---......--124,107.16 100,861.00:191.70 ---- --- -· __ : .. --··---·-·-··- ----·:·· .. . ........ ------- .... ~--- -· -----· .... -·-------+---~----+------

ORIGINAL 1 800.49 1800'4.9 ·-·-· . ·------·--·-+-----+--___:.::::.=.=-==-i 4412 HELV:TIA . t 113,692.43 I -r· --·--=-----+-------!-- '-------+--------! 7312 H GO .. o 10,000.00 • I ~----··•· ... ···--------:---+-~-::-=-::-=t--+--.C.........:--'--+-------+----+~,---J-------l 9721 JOA8ERT _ 4 _______ ..:...:4:..:..14..:..::·..:...;73;::..i.._ __ I,._· _ 221>.22 _...l ___ __j._ SUB TOTA. ' 125,907.65 ...

·-----~128122.87

111 ,065.68 . ---- . - -2-39f88~55 EXPENSE~ -~- 254030.52 1---------·------- *-*****' ............. ···--··--·------· r---------··-·· .. ·-·----+- · - - -+ - - - - - - -1 - - - - - -+ - - - - - - . l - . - - -

24;000.00

JLR

-------1---l---~--...r-:----+--··--··-·· ·--·~---1--·----------+----+---+---- ENGtNEEF NG 1,466.32 "****,.... -----t--txAnUTTI"Q"\""EEXViP 51 E~NHSiEiE~--;3~.9"'6~2~.5~0----+----1f-..:.,..=·=*d-.....--·--~-- r------t---'--'-t------"'---+-.;._:____-I--~==-==-+-- •·• ·-·- ·-- -· -~--IC------ ----C--·-··--·- EXPENSE 26,320.04 111,257:~8 '. ... 1---~-.. . - . ~-1·--·-···· t=_-·--· ~____._----1·-·. ···-----~···- ------ 111,065.68! I . · ---: __ __ 1·' --~ _ __ l 191.70 ·- ] ' Bank Charge !nterest A~it Deposit Who .. Child Payee Date 2011 - - EXP 1117 - . 100.00 CAPITOL

··- .,w.oo CAPITOL 't:Jl.t' TRAIL INSURANCE EXP 150:00 .... - ·- .. ·- 3000.00 UN KOWN : OFF 60.00 02/24 1129' llMELKDs .. - ' 1131 SILVIAROMo TAX 2869.31 -·· ·-·~ 5000-~ >.I.AMO .TAX SILVIARUMO ! ·- L - - . - 9721 SILVIA ROMO TAX 400.00 ·- l-IOWARn l<AHf\I OFF - 1000.00 - ····--- CITI EXP 1~.29 AQ0.00 -- 10.00 CAPITOL EXP .. ' - -~ ; EXP ' 600.00 ,CAPITOL - · · · -

*94 'QArlTOL '.Q(t" ~0()0.()(> - ..

EXP

4000.00 20571.26 . ukn CAPITOL 200.00: ~ -di .. ---- - · - - J..-- .. ... YNK - - - - -·-- ·~--··-- - - ~- 23.'55 ENG '1133 EZDRIVE -- ' - ,_...,. ··- ; 1134 BL LOAN BK 500.<lO : -· -. ·- 1135: l\.f'<lt; GAK(;IA 01-1-. 1tm.UIJ .. -. - .. .. ··- ,6.UTd 1136 ALICIA-H 340.00 -~ ... .,.. - I ... ·'- 1137 ALLSTATE AOTC 517.50= .. ~---· -- .. -·· 6.48 1138 NBP .. ENG .. 1139 IMEl..OA' ,.... - •....•• I ur:r .. ()(JJlll - - 1140 SLYVIA ROMO TAX 157.17 -- --· CAP EXP 500.00 ... ·-·· 150Ct00 XClTY EXP ... 1141 cm TAX !'>5.00 "~--- ~ - ·.··· . ... ... -- - - - TAX: 1142 SLYVIA ROMO 105;16 .... UNK-" ,UNKNO\AIN ~,{)() - -·.·· --···- l .. 1.INKf\10\NN UNI< 959~19 ..:-- AuG2011 .AlJG2o11 .. - SEPT 2011 :SEPT2011 --- j .. - ... -- - i;? no 1102 ni;:F ALICIA. MINO ., ·- 1232 NBP ' ENG 233.18 ·-·--- ·- ' 1233 COSA TAX 1600.00 ·-· . ··- ·- -·' 1234 C08A TM ! 25.00 -· . . 1237 OOSJ\ TAX 1360.QO 1311.AT&T EXP 122.31 . -- 5637.CITI EXP 200.00 I ---·. ·--· 5638 7318 1000.00 - 7318 ; - --- ; ..

·z.oo.oo, CXP ®"9 ,.-- CITY ... 2s2s.12T :EXP ---- .. CAP _,_ EXP 5000.00 4412 1434.39 -- ...... ' .. --00.00 1312 IMELDA OFF =9 CllJ <i!O. lU t:J!.t' - - 5640 cAP- EXP 64.64 .. ·- .. , ........ -- .. - ··-- --- 5641 cm EXP 72;56 .... --- ·-- 5642 cm EXP 147;30 ~--· 10.uu - 1144 32820.85 33971.<i!t> ' --- l~l.3.3~UV ... "f14s -- 1146 SPENT INCOME ....___,. -·-- .1147 6f71.64 T~X HEL 5400.00 -- --· - EXP 1148 UNK 16472;31 23571.26 -- . ,...;.;. 1149 ... 'AUTO 500600' 957.50 Al.AMO --- 1100 OFF 1597.00 TOTAL 33971.26 ... -·-···- 1'1!>1 UNK 5959.19 BC -1000 ·----- 1152 ENG 2'63.21 TOTALINCC. 33961.26 - - ... 1153 -1000.00 7318 SPENT 32820.85 --- 1158 BK 500.00 DIFFERENC 1140.41 .. 1---- 11!;;0 INITUU CIC E 6~ 1100 CAL CK 1800.49 1161 32820.85 11/0811989 Cl!:BAL 1800.49 ! 1162 -o.oo, 32&20.85 11/081198!) CONDlTION -· ·-. -· -- rJC),.;jEiif-Fi u..co .. Bank chariie Interest Balance Cheli Payee Date Amount Deposit Who 2045.44 2010 1117 2000.00 uNif EXP 3945.44 100.00

CAP1

EKf" :»070.+4 CAl"1 7~:00·

- ,_,_ .;TAX 3705.41 BEXAR TAX 1~;1)3' - BEXARTAX :TAX 3533.29, 172.12 --···- 335.7.94; BEXAR TAX lTAX 175.~5 -··· ...... -- ·-·-----· DCXAl\TM TM ~1TZ.l)0 · IOll.pf* TAx I 2965.89 ~- BEXAR TAX 186.46 ·- .. .. BEXAif TAX .. -- TAX 2794.23i 191:66 -2582..81 !

l=--

TAX 211.42 BEXAR TAX ..... ~--· zoo.oo 2:>Z:>.e;;i; i D~Tl"IX T~ 276,28 BEXAR TAX TAX 2047.67 - BEXAR TAX 346.72 1700.95 TAX ' ; --- *95 BEXAR TAX TAX $97:60 1103.15 ; - - r-----···-·- , ijl::.Mt( IM. u1.&.l I~ t>/:>.~:.! ,,_ ··soo.oo CONTOUR 100]0

9030. CITI CARD EXP 727.83. ·soo.oo CONTOUR CAPONE 821.74 376.00 30.09 EXP -·a2·1:t4 CAP.ONE EXP 1UUU.UU 4U.1 Ht:L -·-t- ·~t'C ·. GAJ:'UM:: 16;!1. (4 EXP 200:00 CAPONE 1621.74 '----'--- --·-··· ·-- CAPONE 621.74 EXP 1000.00 EXP 597.53 ClTI 24.21 ·---- 1~_9.~t 5/03UNK l,.;I fl 19U3.13 CAI" --- WC --- CITI 58.401 1844.75 .EXP .-....~ '"' 163.a;> ! 1681.75 CAPONE --~~·· ···-·--·----·--· 1118 OFF 72.95: NOTARY ASSN 1608.80 1119 HEB'NJJO I Al.:J;:) ·AUt.\. !13.W l::l;,.;l.;;IU ·-- i---··--- cm 55.34 1498.16 EXP C'AP ONE ----· EXP 1120 NA1'ioNAL ·ai:.u& -·· OFF·- -· -~--ra.oo ..... 500.00 998.16 980.16 ··~-- - - · - - - - - ~·- ---SO.OO; 1121 EMEWA~RIIa 'Uf:F ~-92~ EXP CITI 92.93' -- ~. -- ....... ·-···-· ··-·--- 827.23 ·-· CA.PONE EXP 300.00, ·- -- CAPONE 527.23 EXP 300.()0j 1000.00 HEl..VET 1227.23 . ... !19:~ . ... - -----··- CA.PONE EXP 921;23 -- CAPONE~ ... exp" 627.23 ~;oo.: -· ---- lMELDACARRILLO OFF 60.001 567.23 Al,JCIA HINOJOSA EXP 38:53; 528.70 _ ...... 39:00'. EZDRIVE OFF 489.70 NBP OFF 19.35: 470.35 -------·- . --- .. - .. 320.35 --- . -·---··· ---- CITI 'EXP 150.00 CAPONE --- .......... ,. __ EXP 200.00 120.35 CAPONE EXP 100.00 20.35 ··--

l

HOWARD KAHN 2100.00 1000.00 HEL : LEG .-1079.65 - ... '. BfxAR 'CCiiJNfY ... - JAx .. ·- - . .. --~· ····· 564.35, 116.00 1100:00 HEL ~--· ....•. EXP CITI 100:00 UNK 50.00 554.35 ,C/lf>ONE EXP 100.00 168.&3 HEL 623.18 ______ ., __ 1-...... , ___ ;.,,._,.._~ ....... ____ _, __ EXP .C/iPONE 600;00 586.90 tff~~'-···----- • 610.Q8f .. EXP .. ·---·

"" ... ···- ········ .... 'C/lf>ONE -·--···---~ 100.00 510.08 cm 1141 cm ___ 410 . .9.8. EXP 100_00 · - 660.0& EXP 150.00 400.00 HEL ---·----·--· ,_ ··ua:oa DEC31 1142 --·- .. --~··~·····- 1143 660.08 11414 ! 1161£6? 10?f\1 ~" -- l 30.ClQ 1145 1146 SPENT .. ---- ... i!NCOME ----·- 1147 TAX 3558.61' - - - - - - f1.4R ... . .... - HEL 5855.73 - . ,_ .. ·-· FXP- ·-·5flj3~41 UNK 3405.62 1145 OFF 269.30 CONTOUR 1000:00 1150 : AUTO 55.30 Tu1AL 10261.35 1151 ' LEGAL 21.00-.00 INCOME-· - 10261.35 .. _ L . . . ._ . . . - . ·-----·u~ RANK CHAR 30.0!'.} .. I 1153 TOTAL 11646.71 "ffitALINU: 10261.35 l---· 1156 11616,62 SPENT ·~i~~~~t~-~

·· 1159!

ERR Dli=FERENC ,Jo.09 ^[1] 1160i --···~- INITIAL CK i . '2045,44, --·-· .... 1161 (;ALCK 660.08• ·.- 1162 E~ CKBAL. 660.08 1~63 <;_<)NDITION -0.00 ., .. . ·-><-·.-!

CONTOUR ACCOUNT

*96 ... -- . -· - · · - --- -··· t 1 --j cONJ~UR HPnLs ~ -· --·· ... . .. 2 i ... --·· r--:- f--- I 2010F 2013Rt ADJ TOTAL 201JF 2012RB SAVINGS TOTALS ADJ 3 i ~011F ·~-~ ... ~12F - ··- -- . 4 INCOME i - i --- -···· ··•" I 6 _,.,_ ~- ···- ---·--· -- ·- --- 8f,113.60 88,113.eo' 88,113.60 6 SALES -· -·-···. --- .:.. e7ifoo 887.00 4,466.90

I 7 UNKSOURSE 2,901.90 3,579.90 - . -~ . " -- {Ei3;8Ss.39 (4'..428.44 8 BK 562.25 21,ID4.70 22,486.95. 1f,OOO.OO 140.00 298,030.84 160,C41.20 845;312.Q.( ~-J645,312:04 ~ 441~ HE~ 1~*.100.00

.. (20,)00.00 20,0CO.OO 10 SA\ANGS (20;COO: o.:cY ' ---·· ·- . ··- zsoo.oo 1 'I 7312HEL GOL.0 '(00;000.00 20,000.00 122,s~q._90 (122~5CO.OO ·-·- ·-···- 12 JOA3ERT 972;. 4,000.00 ''" 4,:mo.o.a - .. - ..... ... - ... (4,0CO~OQ -·· 13 OtV ... -- ... " ·-

14 NAT

-· ·- ... ··- ... 15 ALA~O . .. ...... ...... ·.· '" *97 .51,223.3'1 s.1,2n:37 ' 1S COfffOUR ' ' e11.1es.ae [17 TOTAL INCONE (814,8~0.4~~ - 51.152.06 562.25: 10(015.50 272,100.00 6,640~.09).398;030.84 . 161Ji4$:90 71.901.3i -· . .. - 1a ·- .. .:...,: "' 19 O.UJGOING t ·- .. - .......... ; . -··- "20' " ...... ,.. .. -- - ... TAX 21 219:CXH 525.00 16,784.78 17.528,.JS 1'.!>28.78 .. -··. 22;691.SS; 16,296.90_ . 43~~1,5.63 82,303.o1 ' .. ~2,303.0_1 22 JR .. - .. --~ --"f~. BK 38,C58.19 24.537.20 (63-,8E5.39 - - 1,300.~. 63~~5.39 .: :; .. :8E7.00 .H·,~~ 100;00 98-7;00 2.4 UNl<NOWN 100.00_. -· - --- ..,. ·.·-· 20.oc6:00 20,000;00 SA\ofNGS

26 .. ... 26 JOABERT 9721 ('(OC0.00 1,000.00 (3,000.00 -~.qoo~oo -- .. ,.~ ......... ... 27 CONTOUR 2918 - : ·--·· -·· . CONTOUR.REFC u 175,000.00 22U15.49 221.815.49 28 46,8.:_1~-!~ -- . .. ·- ·-. .. 29 HEL GOLD 7318 -- . 25,00lOO' 25,000.00 (122~&-0.00 (9 ^[1] ,500.oq 30 HELRBFCU - -· . -- . - -·· ··- (e4s,312.04 (645,312.04 3f4411HEL - ... ' . . 9f, 159.86 31,761.89 1;236'.oo t'2o,311.87 600.()o r 45$,296.90 32 · COtlSTRUCTON - ..• 209,~7.28 -- 4~9,Z96.90 .. I 4oo:ooi 235.90 33 Ot=RC E EXPCNS 1, 1 B_?:~1 1,200.00 4P1B._81 i 4,018.~-~ ... --·· -··· ; 34 TR.All. 7318 __ .. -· -·

---·139_03 35 BAf\K CHARGES 95.00 326.49 30.au 70.13 43.62 . (51_.~2 326.49 .. . ... ' ' " . -35 PROFESSIONAL eo;oo 5,060.00 5,000.00 5060.00 1,n3.'ta 546.35 27.40 6,85 ^[7] .12 342.82 7773.70 ' ~7E~ - ·--· "3o,d88.49 30,088.49 8 INSURANCE .. l 15,156.00 14,E32.49 .. ..

..... ---· -l 584,75 584.75 584.751 S AUTO i --- onDEAL ··---·. - _, l

' ' -7{901.37 . l"T01AL 99, 109.921 . 254,040.Qf 31,716.51 137,014.75 918,791.81 . . (§14,8~0-.43 103.971.38 ..... ~.046:36 . 322,~61.~9 41 ; .... _

·-

43 DIFFERENCE 6,$05.58 18,059.09 _(26,076.51 160.416.0~ {160,if6_.09 ("1,484.11! .. --- {11395.95 ~2,819.32 - . - --44 INTilAL CK ANOli 7,125.1'7 25, 184.26 1;703.70 21.9.59 16Q,i16.09 194$48.81 -- ·25, 184,26 0.00 - 193,052.86 45 END CK BALPNC 2i9.59 i, 125: 17 107.75 180.416.0~ 193052.86 ·-- --- 193052:86- BAf\K BALANCE 219.591 i,125.f7' 25,184.26 107.75 160,416.0~ __ 193,052.Slf 4fl ---·cfoo· -- . - o.ao co11oit10N · 0.00! 0.00 O.O:l 0.00 0.00 47 0~00 ...... ·- .. - -- .. - ....... · - .... _I ~ ~ AMOUNT }~~UR ~~~~:C~~ ~~~ -~~ ----~n_k_~~l8~. ___ : ' ~· j - - ; - - - - - - - - ~--····· -·· -- ---·---·...---· ------+-------·-- ·-·- ... ···-·-··--... =- -~~J .. --1793.70 2010 ' 1703.70 __ --: ___ --_·----=------+~-- -_ --------~~---,!-....----···

01/01

02/01 1703.70 ! soo.-00 JOABERf .. -----·-

... 03/0-1 ___.__9-12_1,___ 1203.70 : 0721 500.00. }OABERT' 03/01 ---+--...;--·--·---· ..... - - - - - - - - .. ----;--l---70-3-.7-0 50.00 IME[DA--_...____ · ,----- ;-64/01 : OFF 651.70 · Ci4/of ·---+-E--N-1(-+---~1SO.OO MARK HiNcf ___,_ 562.25 !Erl< --

1065.95 - -+ - - - O!i/01 -- ENO,__ . 7. 70 NBP"·' - - ---- ---l--+---106-- -8.-26--'' ; · - -+ - - - - 06/01 1058.25 - t - - - - -1 - - - ·-----+--- ---~--·· ·-- ·-· ---- 07/01 1.058.25 - - - - · - -+ - - 01101 OFF'.. 50.00 lMELDA 1000.25 oi/61 UNI<; .. --100.oo

soa:2s

ooio1 , ENc 20;00 888.25 ---<---+------- - ---- - - - - - - 09/01. ---E--N-1(;+-. - 25~00 NBP 803.20 ; 00/01 60 .. 00 IMELD~A·--'--1--- . .......,_ ___ -+--- -·- ·---- ;OFF""' ·····--~- 803.25 -- ""79.so NBP 10/01 ENC ---t---+-----·····-------- - 723.75~ 60'.00 IMELDA I 10/01 EN( --.-- 66:ft5" ~r1:_/g0-_~11 ___ go~~F1~F-_--+-. -~---_-i_g_:~_.....e .... : ~-;-~_g_~-+--

*98 6(10{) ^[1] IMELDA •, 454.59 r. ----+-f---- 75.00 !vAL L.ER:=Mc+-1,_____ ·-+-~----~~_-:I,___------- -·- - · 12101 ENG 37'.59 '---'. --1'2101 OFF: 60.00 !MELDA 319.59 ~N--G-.--j--1-00·-.oo-- _VAL LERMj~ --·-219.59 12101 · - - -+ - - ' - . . . . ,_ . - - - - -+ - 12/31 219.59 12/31 219.59

.. TOTAL · -+ -1 - - - 219.59 ·'---·;6235~-----··--+-··-- . + -··f- - - - - - l j...... _____ , ' · · - - · - - ._ - - - - - - - - 2046.36 .. ------ --------+-0-R-IGfNAL _ _ 1703.7 DEPOSITS····--- a62.2G ----+-~---- - - - - - - . - - - · ----- TOTAL IN . L 2265-.95---t------.. ' .... ---------+-· ·-__ - - - ---· '

..... _.-----If-+ SPENT -2046:36 ___ _,_____---r-- - - - - ·-----+---+---'-- ········---t---··· .. - - · - - - - - 2ts.os ,_,_. -- ' tsf\LANCE --'--. BANK~STATI 219.5-9-1----- -i---+-- i..__ __ -+-_____, ___ ____,1-------.--+---- - -+ - - .. - - - - - - . --------1--1---- .. DIFFERENC -0.00 -----~- -- . ------- -+------+------ ····-- - - --+-----··- - - · - - - .. ------ -------4------- ' ; - - - - - . 400.00- OFF ·------f------· -· . ---546.36. ENG ------ ~721 - - - -+ - __ 1 oo_·-_o,oo __ · -+ - . - - - - , - - - - __ ·-~-- _ -+-+------ ___ i . . -----f-----· _____ _ - .. - - - -- - UNK 100.00 _ 2046.36 _ _ _ -+ - -+ - - · - - - · · · · - - ··•-~

- - - - · - · •W

j .. _____ _, ---- .. . f0TAL _ - ----++----- - - --- - - - - - -+ - - - - - - - - - 2046.36 ~ ~ __ - +~~E:.CK= ___ --_·. (i.-~_-o--i--_ -- -~~~~~~--.-~ .. --_ -__ -_-_· _----- ....... --~ ~-- 1 ... 20i1 CONTOUR.FA CON r Cheek Payee Who Bank Charge Interest ·0eposit Balance Date ·- 219:59 01/01 - -· . 219.59 02/01 ---- .. •. f-·· 5.00 214.59 05/01 -- .,. .. 199.59 ·ACME BRICK 15.00 CNST ^[1] 06/01 --- ·-···- .. 2437.34: 2237]5 NAT KL ! 07/01 CNST 19~ 1 ICADWATEnE 2;2a7.7S CNST 10.00 180.6Q' . 162;19. 1957 NSP 27.40'ENG -· --- ·-· IN GRAM 4,558.00 CNST ..... 5237.SI NAT KL 08/01 19.58 831.76 10.00'

·-··· -- .. 152.18 679~58 CNST 08/03 1959 W/IL.L Sl)fJ.. an.oo OFF -·'9zrs- 08/03 1960 IC .. ··-- CNST 92.18 08/03 - ~ -~ -5805.82 08103 1961 JNGRAM C'NST : s.BQ~~oo .. ·- NflP 70.07 ONOT 10.00 "()Clo~ 68~.60 --- 6,642~37 CNS1 HEADWATER 23,69.4.74 NAT KL 09 11159.68' -·- ···---- 10 MASON SETT 3,000.00 CNST 8159.68 ... ·-·-· - ·- DEER CONST 08/03i 3.500.00 .CN..~T 4659;68 ·-·· 185.00 CN$1; -·~· KRIS GARCIA 4474.68 10/01 ' -- ... -·-· -·· CNS1 4474.68 10101 •· 15,oOO]lO CNST ~--10/01 1954 PIMCO -10525.32 .. -·- .... G-4]3.14 lO/t)J 1860 ARExCAVATIG 10,7!0.00 CNSi Z7,7Hl.-40 NAT KL .. 10/01 1970 ACT PIPE 10,000.00 NAT Kl 5,827.29- CNS1 10645.85 -· 1971 PIMCO 10/01 10,125.00 CNS'T 15,000.00' 4,412.0() 15520.85 -·- 10/01 1972 P1MCO 324.00 CNSl 15196.85 - -· 200.00 CNSl · 10/01 1974 DYE 14996.85, - .. ... I ---- •·'- 1976 DYE 10/01 80[00 CNST 20.00 14176.85' .. ·---· 10/01: ,CN_Sl ; 14176.85

I

_,_ .. -- ···- 1110·1 1984 PIMCP '4170.05 10,000.00 'CN3T -- - ------ 4,623.00 CNST -448.15 11/01 1977 HEADWATER *99 11/01 1978 TX CONT 52.00 CNST: 1~.22~.:08 NAT SALE 18726.93 ' - - .. -· 609,oo CN~r· ... 11/01 197~ AMERICAN SI< 18117.93 ... -· 11101 1982 At{ 1;300.00 CNST 30.00 16787.93 ~ ... 2$.00 CNST 11/01 1983 ;AH ! 16761.93 . -- ... ·- HSBC 2,182.91 EXP 11101 10.00 14569.02 --· ·1110·1 1"4SG0.02 · .. ... 12101 1985 HEB,b,UTO 65.25 AlJTC 2;$01.90 CASH 17405.Gii i ·' -·-· 12/01 1986 BKPAYROLL 200.00 CNSl ! 17205.67

.. ... -~ .. " 1?101: 1Qft7 AtJTOINS 1MAA:17 _ --·· 519 50. AUTC - -- ·-·-· 12/01 1.988 .PIMCO . 6, 129.00 ; CNSl "10557.17 -

....

1990 lNGRAif- 12/01 CNST 3.432.00 7125.17 12/01 7125.17 -- -· ... ~ ' - ... -··12101 _ JQ:0,6'1~.00 - 99,0"14.9! : 80.00 4.412.~0?. --- 12101 - --· ... --· -··· -··· 12101 ...

. - --·- _ _,,. ----· ·, 12101 219.59 - ORIG!NAL ' - ··----- ,-12flf1 NAT S8113.60 --· 12/01 . UNKNOWN 2901.90 ' i 12/01 4412HELVETI 1SOOQ,OO ' ' -.- .. ,.... .... ' INWME 12/01 10tiZ~.OS - 12/01 99.109.92 ·SPENT ·-- --·-·· 12101 BALANCE 7;125.17 ·-· -·-- ~-hiri1 .. --- EXP

12/01 2182:91 - ... !;ENG L_12/01 27.40 - CONST RU ~TION CNS! 12/01 96159.86 . -· - EXI"' 564.75 ll/Ul' AUTO ...... - - -- .. ... .. OFF: 12/01 AUTO 60,00 - _. ,. t21()1 OFF BAN)< Ct:IAR 95.00' -- ·- - .... 12.101 BK TOTALS 99109,92 ' 12101 JR 99014.92 --- I ; I 12/01 95.00 ___ ___; L.. -·. - *100 ·- *101 • ..

I ~- - · ~~=-=---- - ;:~;.t -~ coNrdJR-SA~;~G~~=r=- -- · f --__ ==l -t=!~ .:~yee ------- _·-':"-·_O_un_t __ _,_~_···~--~------· .WIRE INCOM 'Deposit W\15'~ l~Ballince---1

5~

OriQ;n ori9irior

2012

20000.oO CK 195()·~:00_ Oi/01 CHECK 500.0cf -- - Uf/Ul- CMt:GI\ . --.000.00

1COOS,O()

------1400.oo -16605.00 07/0f CHECK 03/02 . CHECK___ 1000.00 ···-- - . 10005.00

100 00 - - - f5S05.00 08/02 CH~CJ< ··• aoo.oo , 08102 ^[1] CHECK 14905~00 .-08/02 CHECK ... --- • · -14.fa2.18' 782~82 :j: . . -----137l2.f8" 08/02 CHECK 400,00 .. nt;CK · 800.00 ·· - - · 1zuz. 10- oa102·- .CHECK ···---·-- 9722.18 3200~00·: -891o]Jo 08/02 CHECK . ·-- 812.18 · --- osiq::i PR ______ _,_ __ ;_oo_· ,oo ___ . _____ . ___ __ _____ u1g,oo 09/01 , CHECK 300.00 8110.00 . 10/01 .CHECK.. 200:00 _ _ ______ . 791.Q,QO '."To/Of CHECK ..

182.83 7727.17 1q10·1 CHECK 40(1'00 .. ----·-. - - · . ..... - - - - T~T. IT · 107o1 CHECK -··----:-- - 6427.17 900~00 -1o!Of CHECK______ 700.00 -5121.11. ftA'Ji 17~ ·1ot0f CliECif---·. -··· 100: .. 00 - - -++ - - - 4 · "-.. · - - - · · · f0/01 CHECK . ·------ .

188,.70' ··-- -- --- - - · -+ - -+ - - - 5438.47 ·10101 CHECK -s:4s 1443.95 4000:00-·-- ---+-+---,.---+- 111or· "CHECK -- - - - · ; - - - - - ----· . - ···1·443495 12/01 CHECK ·1·443]j'~ 2013 ;CHECK ----~r----- *102 1443'.95

~ -, 01/0f- CHECK 1445:2<> 1.25 '02101 - - --~-~~-- 1.u~·?n _.....,_ _ _,_____,~ ~-+---<-14.ts.20 ' 03/01 ·-1445.91 . .... ___ (Hf . '04/01 - - I -+ - - ·051o·-1-+-P-R 100.00 I 50000;00 CK : - ---- . S1345.91 . - -+ - - - - - - 06/0-f+-'--'--- ~()~28 - 51346.19 07/01 -------· - · - - - -+ - - 15.76 51361:95 08/0f'' .. _____ ,. .. 51361;95

·-T-+---=220-. 10..<aii 08/0 1 · CHECK 00000,oQ $7S.OO . o9iOreK'' · ----- ... ·---+---'2-2035 .. 12-· > - - - - ---- 25.00

·-.,,.-20-.1=7 10101 + - - - - - - -~-·- - - - - - ~'.oo '11!01 - - · - - - - - - - - , - - - - ! - - - - - · -----~.-+-, - - - - ·.- -25:00 t21o1=-+- 7.6[ ..... ~5(04 t2/0f BK 0.00 .TOTALS ---- ~'952~69+---- 46-1353.971 46.32 - - --·-:....-- -+ - - - - - - - - · --CHECKING · 48066.53 INCOME ----- ....... " R.ililt ni PH RRon~-'-~·-,f":+. +-r11_Trn._· -•+---1--- -· · ~ - 2012 - . . . ·- -·--+----+--- -----+----+- . HRS RATE; TOTA SS WH OTHE AMOIJN-T-~---1.-TY-P+C°K ~9/1 D~_~QS-IT BALANCE. - DATE NAME- az. 00 p .:Si.oo :-.. --oTTlS Vi'll.Dr!MC~r:: LCt\MA. 10 I -400.00 ,DL 07/30 "CASH DL - --- 104 ,__ - -:400_00 8 "01119 ETHAN MccAt:I-- ~2ot sooo.oo 440.00 IF> 1001 40.75 - - 1.2 489 2a 1 41 4560.oo 24 11.25 "z76""15 r+-2r - 228.oo p "'7 07119 DON SHOEMAKER - . 1002 50Cf00 - 4832.00 7 07/19 WELDEN SHOEMAKER 16 · 14 224 13 11 . 200.00 P 1003 1500.00 6132.00 9 288 16 1004-1400.00 ! - , . --07/19 FREOSEEHA.lfs8r···- 32 1i. 36 219.00 p 7313:00 L----- r·o7719 AG 36.oo f> · 1oos 7277-:-oo,

-3~ 7000 00 S --,-10{jff--·· ---- ---:i:\777on 7 07/19 h~ l=NTF=RPRISi=- . >--7 07/19 VALDEMERE LERMA·--· ~f. 16 544 31; --32 481.tlO p"" 1007' . .. 4796.oo fooa 7 07/20 DiXIEOIL 2898c00 D 1898.00 · --~·-- · ---zfi 1 oc· ^[1010] 1--7 VOID ··-~. V 1009:------ 1898.00 •oso.oo ·T CASH · -.. a"" 01126 ETHAN MCCAU

40· - 12j 480 27 41 20 39 0 p 1011 1315600 ·'edoo 7 07/26,LlONSH~AKER 3.95. ~p 1012 40 1t25·· 450 25 45' ---'- 7 07126 WELD_E,N SHQEMAKE,R ··20 14: 280. -16 2$4;00 P 1013 647.oO --"396M vr1z.c l"RED SEEHAOSEN -·- ~ . 8 _ ¥"u' '!ts ' HI 251,00 p ·---im"4· .:io· 1 - , =1 01ri6 AG - · , ~36 -- .· · 1015 ~-- 35o:«:Jo 36.oo P ,_ .7 01126 VA[BEMEREJERMl\~75. 16 14s ·12si - --~--·a-20,00 ·p -- 1016

- --· ~26o.oo - TOO:OO P~ . 1017~---, -~ W . 100 7 e-c07t26 VALDEME~E l,,1;_B.MA -360.00 8 08J24 DON SHOEMAKER 32 H.251 360 45 "675.00 315~00 P 1018 1-----=--8 08!24 WELDEN SHOEMAKER. 264.oO P 14 .. 280 16 20 1019 --_939~00 a· 0~4 FRED-SEEHAUSEN. 1020_____ . 40 8! -·3.20 41 36 243.00 P -1182.00 00.00 r · 1021 -(f i:i°'2"1 AO - . . - -36 -1218.00 16! "5:t2 58 -1672.00 -8 ·-08/24 VALDEMERE LERMA 32· 454.00 ;P 1022 · ··a 00!24VALDEMERELERMA 20· "so

4 80.00·P 1023T -1752.00 a · :\iOib v · · · -175200 HJ24 ------~~~ • 8 VUllJ V 102:5 -17::>2.oO ---=2252:00 ! B o8i03 r;JEXAR COUNTY SWPPE MIT - - ----r---- 000:00 CF'- *103 -1026 ---- -- · 1027>----·- -250'.foo-: --!81--08103 FRED'SEEHAUSEN 40·-- 6 320 ·33 36 251.00 p 8Tli8io3 vvELDEt.fSHOEMAKER 253.00. P- - 1026 ,20, 14 280 27' -2756.00 32:11.25 aao· 62.: 8 08/Q3 DONSHOEMAKER 328.()() p i 1029 -308400 20 160 _!l!... -- .. --.§184.00 •-8 08/03 VALDEMERE LERMA-·... 100.00 P 5 1030 • ~~L---~~1 -- 16 6.40 6() 8 -08/03 V"[DEMEREL~RMA ~3'.i4.00 40 . - 1 ~8 OSl<n A<i. ..... 2Q 26.0() P _ _ __ 1022, ___ -~800-1?9 8 08l03·txpwr--· 82.00•E 1033' . ·3a8200 8 ·- 08/03 .CHASE BANKTXPMR REPA ffl\i1x:R"" _ _,__ 21'lJ2](fE_'""_ 1~- .. --~84j)Q -9 08/06 'CHRlS GARCIA" . REPP RS · 120.00 E 1035: - - -6704 .. 00

100.00 e I) - OOIOO · CHRl~OAR.CIAfALICIA H NOJO f\C::J>A RS -0604.00 10;:)0 . 8 OBI06 lMEibACAMMILLO .. . .. ---60.00 M 1037 ~--- -- -6924.00

v 1038 ~-- ' .8 I 08/06 VOID -·--~---. -- -6~24:00 ,-··a~ 681'09 ooNsHoEMAKER- -7s05;oo• 40 n.25 450 s9 - 381:00 F> 1039 · -'f040 . 8 08!U9 WELDEN SHOEMAKER ·.7553,0Q. 20• 14 280 16 248.00 P 8 --08/09 FRED SEEHAUSEN 243.00 p - 10.iff -- 1000.00 4()' 8 32{} ' 18' 23 36 "::ij79s.oo; a 08/09 AG 3'6.oo P 1042>--·-100.00 ~872 oo

.:35 · . .. 8 0810!'.l VAJJ:lPMt:iRt::TF"Ri'itl\- . - 40 -1R· Adn ~ - 4A ~i;i\--00 P~- -·-1043>-- SOOJlO -6!1~!100 100.00._L --~ 1 1---c-8 -08/o9 VAL.DEMERE ~RMA ZO 100 ~ ----. __ 812: 16 ~!_1_782 -~5 a 08/to,&Off"IVE- , . . . .. 202.49 s 1s2;s2. -ss37.49 1045 ·a 08116TNATIONAl 8L1IEPR1Nr · : --~.33 ENG -1046' - -- - 400.00~-- -5276.ai i- - - - - - - , - ' - - - . · - · t----=-0 06110 TXPMR CttAlNO'AW -· -- -· ' - - - · - . 59-4.10 c '""ooo.oo . --'-4071.00 10-47 . . : . T- 500:00 DL . 8. - 08/10 CASHDA'lLABib.R:ER 1048 3200.0(f -2171.00 25000.00 -227_07.41 I ~-8 '. 08110 TXOPMR PAFffs·-. - - - · _ 121.59 E - --1049

8 08110 CHASE BANK MIUXER Tl ETH 2812.00 E 1050 ··--;:-- 19895.41 ~~8 08/17 CASH . ____ :>Ula!U DL __ :_:105"! ___ ,.__ -:::_~~~~ 8 08117 DONSHOEMAKE!R 40. 11:25 450 38'1~ P 1052 19014.41

SQ

8 OST17 WEL[}EN:SHOEMAKER c ·20 - 14 200- 16 - - ----~ooP- ··1053 -- . ··-- "1875Q.4~ .•. , 40,_ -~ ··m--:::ra R Mi11 FRmsF=t:HAusE:N 242:92 P ~- _____ 2a 36 18507A~ 36.00 P 1055- 8 ··Dll/1f.~• - - · -36 I 18471.49

-~-~, 081·1r~EMERel.ER¥A 40 tff_~~~- 46, ~-=-- ~~.P "Hl56~-~----'-- 179_13.65 8 08117 VALOEMERELERMA 5 20 100. :. 100.00.P 1057_ --~17~~3.65 i i s;-6im1 OQNSHOtMAKER- .4(!'°1125 A.sot- fig ' -~·~fi-~~-- __ -_-- 171~~~ '.IB1 OO'P 10!18 17432.65 r a1· 08J31 WELDENSHOEMAKER

201 14 280 16 I []! . 08!3.:! fREO.SEEHAUSE_t~L __ _(_-~~-~ -~~ __ . __ -~ _ 2__¥.00 P 1~_9 ~- _ _ 1692~.65 -·--r-~1 ·· r--=-r-==~c=-- --· ··----· -·· .. .,._ -- -~-~~--- as:oo ^[1] ? 1061 16aes::-ei;- B Otl/91 l A~ t -16300.65 ·- ·40 562.00 ;P 1062 8 081'31 VALDEMERE LERMA 16! 640 58! 16200.65 ~8-1-.,.06/_3~11+,-' V=ALD=··~e_M_ER_E_· :_LE_R_MA_· __ -t--__ 5 -.~or, ~1.00 100.00 p 1063 .,i--16200:65 p 1064 8 08l31 'VOID : -- - --o- -~IT~f=AL'o - . - . - . -- ---··--+-1=0-1---1""'4~, -22=-:-,.4-t--oz"""4-++--·---.. -·---: ioo.o_o_ P · ! 10000.00 1005 ·· · -- · · 1ti66 ·-·---=i .. - 1§~19-~~ 8 08/31.JERRYRICHIE ---- .. --.. 16 ... _1~! 208 21 l ~T87.o6 ·p - 105.67 p 1067 : 15713.98 8 08/31 •ARMONDO LERMA 8 14 '. 112 6 · . 8 08/31. FRED SEEHAUSEN BOBRIPJ,.E .aon.~1eR 1oss ·----.;-~14913~8

i f _I;_ Iv 1 - -+ - - - t - - - - - - - - - - t - - -+ - - -+ - - - · - -~~~- -.:--r-r--.. --=--=w= =-=~~~~----=--+--1491j:98_ 14!1T3.98 , • 1 . ' !

JV I 1.4913.98 ·----1 --·· ·--- - ·-·-;--·~t··--·-·------·--rv--- -------!"--· ~--·-·-·-·-·

1A013.08

09/05! SAWS 1060.00 W 1069 13853.98 ··,---r--· ·-~----.....__,.···:----- ... - ... --~-- ........... ---<---~---+---++--~---~-~~-+--~------+--~-c=--i 36 .. ; ,___,.___09_1_05__,i_V_AL_D_E_M_E_R_E_L_ER_MA_· ·_+--_24--+-_16~:_384 346,00 P 1069 13507.98 1---i--=:~·~=~-·1-; 1 ~~~~R~EM_Y_R_IC_H_IE_· ---t-----+-----+-- _. _ __ ---~=-=~~=- ~~ ~;~~::

! , ! 1071 11284.98 9 09/~IMCOMASONRY 2000.00jKL 20 14: 200 >-_1!!.;.:__+- 264:001P 1071 11020.98 ··9-00/051WELDENSHOEMAKER 39 l . • -9 09/051 JEREMY RICHIE

24 13 j 312 273.0() j P 1072 10747:98 10503.98 9 09105 I FRED SEEHAU$EN ; 35 j 8 ^[1] 320 40 244:0() 'P 1073 40 1--o-9+--=09/05-=-=c. ,,-1~-=o-=-o-N""'s.,..H""'o=e,,..,MAK...,..· ""e=R=-. --+-____,.40.,...,· '""1..,...1_2,,...,5--',-.-450·..,.,,.+,.,.- 69 361.00 P 1014 10122.ss --'i5:oo 15·- ---1075 -------->---:i0047.98 f---,,-9+--_....,_F_,R~E=D~S=EE=-HA_· _U_SEN __ -t---1-----· 1 -~=-~-· _ _l_·_· :~c----~-·~54.00 P . _ _!~,_ .. _____ 9 09/05 VALDEMERE LERMA 3 20 60 i ,__!:!-+--'OW_. _1?_-~J_FR_F_U~Y_R_IC_H_IF~· ----+--?_?_s ...... · ___ 13 . 2Q2 5; . .· 38 . 254, 50 P 1078 Q71l3 48

·9539_·45- - -----~~~:~il ,_~ --·····-· ~~&~-~1-rccrn~c-.-·-·-- · ' . ^[1] ::~~ ~ ^[1] ~g;g -tioo.-23 ·00' :'J0.00 p 1060 f) ;l\(J I _d _ __ _ ! ---~-i--~-- 1~· &--- -~~:}--!~ --- --~~J! : 09/05i~~ci:~i~~~~MA ~~J ~~- S : 2S4JJO , , - -:ros3"'-···· ---- 9 09/05 :weLDEN:sf!OEMAKER- ·- 20 14 280. 16 . l 1326.23 ,_! _ Ul:llOO ~·~· lt> . Q'IV .. • . ^[04] i . ·- Ltf{MA ;;J;JO.IJIJ t' ,jUU.UU llJllJ . .!:;> . "IU - --------779~23 2sfOO:P -- *104 9 09/05 DON SHOEMAKER 32 11.25 36tf .. - . 9 09!05 ·VVELDEN SHOEMAKER 14 280 264~00 p 20 515.23 9 01/01- DON SHOEMAKER 40 11.25.. 450 381.00 p 1087 134.23 280.00 p 1089 85.ZS 9 09/23 FRED SEEHAUSEN 40 81 326 40 io 09123.!AG 36.00 p 1088 200.00 249.23 40 11.25 45():; 381.00 p 10 09/JO : DON SHOEMAKER 1091 182.83 51.06 ·;,-o--owao'!VVELDCM Sl40r;;,MAKGA 14; rul()'. 28-1.00 p 00 1000 '100:00 187.06 10 ~/~j.~~~Q§_~E~AUS~f~t_ __ +-'-_40--+---~--~9. ___ 4Q+ __ ..____ 244.00 P 1093 900.00 643.06 10 10/07 1AG , 36.00 P 1092 700.00 1507.06

i ~·· ._. "-·--7tlep---~---r----ir--~---r---rr;---__,...---;;;2;;;;;7.-;;;;7:;;;-'6t;:E::;-:N<.:;-:;:;1--:1'-0~9471------t--1"4:::;:79=-.36=-i lti i0/0i-:-1.JO'Ns""·"""Ho=1::""M=AK==t..,.K~-+--~!llll=-1--1=1-=2t>~.~4""w~1._,· -++-~~-_,__-~;;sts~,~.w.,,,,.· +"'~-+--.;,.1u·~~,-,...+1 1titfoffj" ____ fltm.&B: --1095. 186.10:· fl23:00 14 2$>1 10"·10107 WELDEN $HOC.MAKER 20 264.00 P ^[1] 40 " - 'lr·-320:·-40 : : .. 36" - 244.ocf p--- -1698. 4000.00 --4879.oo 10 10/07 FRED SEEHA(iSEN- -

' ------y· ·:35_ .10 10/07 ·AG 36.00 P 25000.00 29843.06 1096 !TEXAS MUTUAL 904.00 I 1100 28939.06 305.00' p ----"·i1oo - -·------- --25534.00· 10 10/14 DON SHOEMAl<ER 32 1125 360 55 --·-··264.00 P-· • 10 10114 VVELDENSHOE~R . 20 14 280 i 16 28370.06 -1~0-+--1~0/~1-4+=F=R=i;=o~g=i;:=i;;~t-l~A=IJg=i;=N~. ~-+--~40=-+--g"'_+ -mt-·40· ·t ··---~·--"=·3R.n---?..->4Ml=--~·I 0 P

10s:ls:l ·---- •- - - c·~-1,.7700 10· 10/14 AG_____ ' ' . -36 - 36~0 p 1101 28091.00

I

.-, .. - ·--- ----~----, · T -- -- --·2aoero0 10 10t21 v - J,g. Ci~~ " •• •• +-- ·------- - ~~g;~:;~

~

-· - - .. -27847:00 10 UJ.'21 FRED SEEHAUSEN 40 8 320 ^[1] 40 38 244.00 P 1102 -- -- .. i 1( 'f1/76 VALDEMj;;Rt;LERMA-----,---·5 --30 "-l5o . V 37841.0o 10000.00 ;2S~e1 r142s, soo · .,, ___ . -·---- ·1.t 1·112.1 :ooFf·sFioEMAKER v -~ro-:430s.oo -42.1s2.00I ^[1] --~--. - -- BOBBY CHINESE -~ ---- - .·· . 7808.00 BR 20000.00 54344.00 . 11 : 11127 VALO~Ml;RE LERMA ·-·- -·--- - V 859.31 55003.31 ~ 11/27 :SLVIA ROMOJLRIP . 162

---- ----.....,, --,--+--+-+----+--- - -- 10000.00 JLR 45003.31 ~-119.l. .. f.$)St\PERMIT 25.nn CF_v_ 1024 . 44S7ttJ_1_ .. -.. ~. __ . -...... ;·--··. .... 1·1 ·11/27 IRS' . 2043 ... 93 ·p , 1126 42934.38 ~~~~.

39.00 s _, 'f'!T"'Fti27-i:z··- 1127 -·- ·---- --42895.38 11 11127 IMELDA-------+--------··-------+---o------+--+ 60.00 M . ;· - 1128 42835.38~ - - - - -+ - - i ---- .... - --+---....+----+-- 66,~5 !:NC ··-1129 __ __ _ "1277013 11 11127 NBP. ---+-----+\/ 11 11127 1130: 42770.13

I

. ffa1-, -----+--~3877{>-:-1_~ 11 11127 · 4000.00 IP ---t-- .. " ' - -1 - t - - - - t - - - - · ~---·· .. _,_ ---~----'--- -~~,i.·--~-~~·

...

..

oo.oo M 11·20 4"SOS&.:>6 HfZT I MELDA : .. .. 43034.13 f}S.25 ENC: 1129 ! ' 11127 NBP - v ' 43034.13 1130 1 \' 11127 -

i An00.00 p 30034.13 1131· - -~ 11/27' 38884.13 150.00.P 1132 ~127 VALDEMERE LERMA .. 11'27 DON SHOEMAKER 300.00 p 38584.13 1133 .. ·- -· i.-- 300.0D p 38284.13 1134 I• 11/27 VALOEMERE LERMA --"·- v 1·5()()00.00 10029-4.13 f11Z7 · - - -- I• ... -- ·-· .. BR 40000.00 222816:13

5468.00 OW !• 11127 WIRE TRACKS -nao.oo eR 230596.13 ; 1 '" 11127 RRIPLET CHINESE RETl RN i -·· ·- 5().00 j:>

-·· L_ - - · -

108. 230546.13 ~1 t/27 VALDEll!1Ef<E LERMA ·-· 230504,93· 41.20.W 1072' "' 11127 SAWS . - 230394.39 110.54 ENC 1073 " 11127 f\IBP 175.0(l s 230219.39 1074 I• 11127 EZORIVE 11127 c·f>s· _.,_ 00403.~ c:LI::'.• 183010;00 101"G

I

3000.00 s 160816.09 ^[11] 11127 TEXAS LANDMARK SUR 'EV 1103 -- -· ~. -· fi3s. 400.00 p 160416.09, I', 11/27 ,VAi.DEMERE LERMA .... ---·- ··-·- -723.00 'P ..

I•·

h .. - - - - · .. ·- ' ' ......

- ·- . . -··· I .. .. ! -· !• . -··· ·,.'---- ****'***•" 298030.84 348Z884.97 137,475.69

-- .. -· - - 139.06 TYP CKNO DEPOSIT ' .. ~Al,ANCE ' 137614.75 ' ! -- .. ·-· ~- 139.lJ6: BAN KCHAH ~t!:i ' ··-- " 25759.!,le PAY ROLL .. 5416.49 SUR ~EV H ' -- ··--·--- -·-·· Fl I• A1A300 DIF~ .. ---· -·····-- 1----<"" 10824.02. EOl PMENi I• ! ... *105 - .- 66403.30 cPs:a~c

I•

---- .. 16i:Kioo .DAYLABOR SAV500 .I• ., .. . ... --· .. .. ... "IZ0.00 MAlllTAti'I ... - . .. ;, 6296.00. _BOB RIPLE~ I -- ·-·-,.- ---- ! .. - : 1101.20,WA ER I< j I• 904.00 INSI RA_~C"'.F -- ----- -·· ,. I• 10000.00 JLR - l•i------ 525.00 cm A/FEES ... 342.82 ENC: NEER ii m "' " - . - -- -·· .... r. 2000.00 KEY .LARGO ^[111]

.137,61~.75 .. .. .... -· ~--- ' i -- --· .,.._ MOFIED FOR lJ TALS · ' 139.06 BAN I< CHAf;GES ·-·-·· 120,311.87 COii STRUV ~TION -- ... ~ ·«-·- 16,296.00 JR ... ... .... .. · - - - 342.92 ENO _ ... 525.00 TAX i - .. .. ' .. +------ ... --·· ' ;...-..,. - · 137,614.75 TOT N- .. - . ·-·-·· ....._.._-..J - - ' -·-- . t QRI• NAI._- I• ~-

............. .. ·rot ~-OEP1 )Sff ... I• ORIGINAL 298030.84 - • • Ol;;POSffS G~R i;)t.P 0:MSi;;s 137614.75 . --··: . ,SPENT SAlJ ~~CE 1§0416.09 ERR _____ ,

..

ERR BALANCE ' BAN !STAT MEN 160416;09 -1077.00 ---- . ... ! . moN 1i' 2000 qo" -O;OOj I ... -~~- . · - - - - - · · ·- MANK t-tt: l:::RK - .. . .. .. ... ! RANr lfltPW 1:i~Ml(~·r.ONT(.\UR ··-- ! --· -- ·----·- -·- ·. ' .. : 2013 HRS RATE TOTAL SS DEPOSIT ;SAL.AtlCE MON DATE NAME WH OTH1:1- AMOl.INT lYP CKNO .. . ·- WH OTHE~ AMQUNT TVP Cf5.NO oFPOf;IT RAIANr.F NAME FfRS RATE TO{AL SS MON.DATE 160416]9 ... ., ... .. i 972-40 E 1-077 159443.69 1 J 01£14 HOLTCAT7 1511713.69 730.00 INS 1-078 1i {11107 ALLSTATE; - _, ... - .... 831.00 1{179 157882.69 1 01/01 COSAPLAT g~ 250:00 157632.69 1()80 ^[1] Ul/Ul ~U:iAPLAf -- -·· 2500.00 sui: ERR 155132.SQ I 1 01/01,DYE ENT -· I • 1 01/01 TExAs LAND"!~KSUR\'EY ERR 153982.69 ! 1.150.00 SUR 1136 6.69 152245.26 151829.30. 1744.12 IRS 1 01/01 IRS .. ···- <f15.96 IRS 2' ~-i 01/Uf ,f(~ - . ·3: ·1 -01Jt)1 JOHN RIPLEY WIRE 142365.30: 9ll64.00 JLR ·- .. v 14236i301 BANK OMDEND f {11/01 .. : ~-~ ·- v 142365,30 1

-··-· ··- ·-· ·-- r;r -02/01 NDI" 20.01 !!=f.11;; IOfl'J 1~;144.4l:I .. -- .. .. ... - 142315.58 28.91 EXP 1085 2 02/01 SOUPER SALAD •·· 169.50 .p 142146.08 1.5.00 12:00 187;50, ERR 2 02/01 VICTOR LOPEZ 18 ... -~ -ERR ,., . 160.00,P 141986.08 16.00 11.00 176.00• 16! 2 02/01 WILLIAM Lt:vvi~ ' - ... .,nnn 1A Oil '360.00i s::;nn - Hf()OS.20 2. 02/01 VAIOAMAR I l=RMA . 220:00 £' -41.20 . . ERR 2' 02/01 VAL.DAMAR LERMA 3.00: 20.® 60.00 EXP 141629.28. 1137 2' 02/01 CHASE CARO.•SR\llCE 13164.15 JLR 128465J3 ' .• .. 126505.13 2 02/01 TX LANDMARK SURVEY 1960.00 ENG 1138 2 02/01 ,ez DRIVE 11'\IO 126!125.0if ?AllO'I i=NG - -· h .. 49:88 ENG 1140 '"126175.20 02/01 jLONE STAR REPRODUC ION ···- : 2 02/01 :TEXAS MUTUAL 634,00 1141 ,,, __ 12041.20 INS - ·-· 1z5541.2[

2 .. --·- 100.00 p 103' 1254.41 :20 : 3 03/01 SLOPEZ ___ ,_ ... ~._ ·- -- - :·· 145.00 E ' 1091 125296;20' ;) U.JIVI -·· ·' 03/01 SlOPEz 101.00 p ' -~~· 1092 125195.20 3 -- .. ... 115.00 p 3 03/01 ARMONOO LERMA 9.00 15.oo 135.00 1093 125080.20 20 .... 181.00. p 124899.20 3 03101 VL 12.00 18.00 216.00 --~ 1004 ... - ·- ---· - .. 124879.20' .. Vi:. 20.uu•<:A.- :J 0:1/01 l~ *106 1o96 3 03105 B&TGLASS ___ 200.00 E i 124679.20 ' . -- 1180.00 SOI< .. . .. : 123499.20 3 03105 TX LANDMARK SURVEY 1097 -3 03/05 VL 33.00 ;18.00 594.00 136 458.00 p 123041.20 1098 I .. ~o .. oo 1G.00 o+s.7.00 ·1uw 4~:::1.00 p ^[3] 03/05 AflMOl400'J.,.CnMA 1££tiuo.<!U -·· -· 120.00 EXP 3 03!05 iVL 1100 122486.20 122186,20 -·· : 3 03108 .DAY LABOR Dl 1141 300.0Q 11.42. - 3': 03/08 .OIXlt; on: 3349.37 D 118836;83, ! ... .... 100.oO. E:Xr fHOT 3 ^[03115] VI 116r.l0.M; ... 558.00 p 3 Qaf15 VI.. 1144 118178:83 117642.83 ~ ! ... ·- a 03115 ARMONDOLERMA. 37,!'() 16.00 600.00 - ' " 536.00 p 6:4 f145 ... -· 3 03/15 ARMOND.0 LERMA 50;00 EXP 1146 117592.83 .. , 3 03115 SLOPEZ 28.00 15:00 420JIO 9fif\M p -- 1148 54 ^[1147] 11722S:o:i 3' 03/15 DELMAR RAMIREZ 24.00 12.-00 288.00 18 270.QO:P 116956.83 1.060~00 w 3 03115 SAWS WATER.METER 1149 - : 115896.83 l .. 3 03118 DELMAR RAMIRE:Z .. ff so ;i2 16.00 12,()o 192,00· 180.00 p 115.716.83 3 03118 DIXIE OIL .• 759.49 D 2000 ... 114957.~ ' -- 265.55 E 114691.79 J lfJ/18 ~U811N UISTRl8u1ct<~ .2003 - w~ '• 3 OS/18 HOLT CAT 150.16 E 2004 114541.63 ... 24.00 ·12.00 ?88.00 40 248:00 p 3 03122 DELMAR RAMIREZ 114293.63 2125 - -- . ... .. ~ROO 14.00 500.oo 3 03fl2 FRED SEEHAUSEN 78. 446.00 p 2126 113847.83 36.00 •· .. ....,...w IUL ---.r--- ·- 7 113247.63 .... ... -· v 113247:63 I - - 4 04/01 CPS POLES 2481.89 R 1001 110765.74 ^[1] - .. I 4 04/01 ASCO J _:!6().38 E 20011 .. O'VC1 toomrjfilu;., 110405.36 .. . 'IQO;IJQ l:L - ·- -- 11uvu5 . .;:i0 iG114' . 10944$.36 . ~~ 04/01 VALOE\'t1!=RE LER~A 40,00 16.!lO '640:00 80 560.00 p 2115i ... . 04/01 VALOEMERE LERMA EX 5.00 20.00 100,00 2116 1093'ffi.36 . 4 100.00 EXP .. 4 04/01 ARMONDOLERMA 40.00 1.5.00 600.00 526.00 rP 2127 108819.36 - 7_~ -.-- • ~ -ndiil1. 'AR~OO L~W:.~ 1.i.bo 70.00 £><r: 70.00 ' .4 S:OO. ^[21211] 100748.~o .. - 4. 04101 Scotty Lopez 32,00 14.0U 448;00 36 2129 .410.00 p 108339-:-36 IW01 S~IO 8.00 14.oo 112.00. 2130 4 104~00 p 101g35:~ ~ -·- - -·. 4 Q4701 EA$¥ DRIVE 1680;00:SU 2131 .. 106555.36. 2135 ·- -· 11i.'.!R 16 :E 4 0001 CLEARCHOICE GLASS .... .J04D1A ?O 4 04IG1 SCdm'LOPEZ 100:00 p 8.00 14.00 112J:)Oi 12 2136 - 104819.20 -- - ·- 398.00 0 2136 104421.20 04!01 OlXIEOIL --·-·' .. ' .... 4 04/Q1 CTlLAX .. 261.46 JLR 2137 1041~9.74 I .. .. 375.00 p I 4 04/01 VAL.DEMERE LERMA 24.00 17.00 408.00 .103784.74 33 2139 .... O'i/01 OlXIC'OJI.:_ ·-· .. Z14lJ. 396.iJI) IJ I _ . ..,_ IU.:JoXJV.14 .- - 103275.74 111.00 p 04/01 SCOTTY LOPEZ 16.00 14.00 224~00 4 13 100.00 -~~141 ', -·- -· '04mt Utr.HAFI ·- -· 1-i'i.oo p 169102.7..t - 21-'12 1lt oo 1? nn to2 oo 1Q.l)O 4 ~·~ : 103042.74 60.00 EXP 2144' 4.00 ts.oo ~:oo 4 CM/01 ARMONDO LERMA 23 "" 313.00 p 2f4s 102729;74: - - - 24;00 14,00 336.00 4 04101 ARMONDO LERMA --- - 102687.74 42.00 EXP'. 2146 { 4 04/01 ARMONDO LERMA ' 78 446.00 p 2147 tll??4174 40.oo· 14JJP 560.oo 4 04101 FRED .ru=EHAUSEN ~(too. 102185-:ai 55.90 E -~45 -· 4 CM/01 ASCO ·- .. - 2149 102078.29 1()7.55.E

04/(}1 AUSTIN DISTRlijUT 2150 __ 11)1743;0~ 335.26 E ' 4, 04/01 HOLT -- -· ---· 1!)2.00 p ·2151 1015~1.03 04A>t ROSIE JIMENEZ

3479.54 PLB .. 98071.49 2152

4 04/01•ACT

' 97937.19 ENG 2153. 134.30 4 04101 LONE STARREPROGRAi ICS ... - 100.00 p 97837.19· 2154 CM/01 VALOEMERE LERMA EXf 5.00 20.00 100.00 375.54 ti 97461.65 :n55 4 0410.1 OOOEOJL ^[4] 0410l VAlDCMt:Kt: LI:t<M.A t:Af 4.UO zu.w HUclJIJ. l156 80.00 t:XI" 91.JO 1.DO 96892.65 32.00 1·1,00 544.00 489,QQ,P 2157 55 .4 04A>1 VALDEMERE LERMA - ·~~. -

--· 96426:65 50. 466:00:P 2158 32:0Q 15.00 516.0Q: 4 -04A>1 ARMONOD LERMA .. 56.00 p ·4·, 04/01 2159 96370,65 .. ARMONOOLERMA exp -4.0() il4.00 56,(p --·.z-.01 -· "°:oo -a.oo,. .. O;OO; .... 00 oOo.00 TO --- ~lill:4:oo O<HOJ ·rl"lcD.·3C011\UOCN 435.00 p 2163 95489.65 ~.00 15.00 480.00 45 4 04/01 SCottv Lopez ;374.00 p 2164 95115.65 36.00 I 4 Q.4101, FRED SEEHAUSEN m2 .40.00 14~00 560.00 90 95015-:65 4 04/01 VL -- 100.00 EXP 2169 - .. ' ·I IHOG0.•1 067.t• 0 t!170' 0.<110.1 DIXl!;OJL ^[4] ·- -· ·- 434.oo P ao ,· 36J)ff 2171' &3624.41' 40.00 14.00' ;560.00 - 4 04A>1 FRED SEEHAUSEN --- -· - 93191.41: ~.00 15.00 486.00 433.00 p 2172 4 04/01 ARMONOQ LEA.MA 53 -- 16.oo 15.00 - - ~- 221.00 p .2'173 92970.41 240.00 19 4 04/01 SCCllV LODez .. r----4 04/61 MICHAEL SISK ?17A A?~i:IR41 32.00 1:too 41fU'IO 4200. 374M P ·-~ 575.00 p 2175 92021.41 11;0Q 680.-00.1105:00 4 CM/01 VL 40.00 - - - --gf's65:4f .... - '----4 ~64/o1 A,RMONDO LERM,6; ~xo 4.00 14.00 56.00 5S:Oo'EXP 2176 222,00 p 18 2177 91743.41 4: 04/01 Josuha Shoeve m-6 16.00 :15:00 240.00 - .. _ __ Jl1648:41 95.00 FM 2179 2180 4' 04A>1 CORTEZ LIQUID 2485.00 COl'I 4 04/01 lnaram ^[1] 35])0 . 89163.41 71.00 1.00 -· 36.00 p 2181• 89127.41 4 04/01 A!3 --- -·88977.41; ~36.00' 1,00 - 150~00 E 2182 4 04/01 gnrtire ' - ' 550.00 E 2183 118427.4.1 4 04/01 ~ dehrntt!!!. i LlB4 ~---- - --88277.41 l;;t':S I t:MI' 15~);{)() EL 1.1411.11 ... -· ·- -· . 88220.41' *107 - - 57.00.IRS 2185 04/01 .IRS ... 1230.89 b 2186 86989.52 4 04A>1 DOOEOtL - .. 4 .04/01 VALDEMERE LERMA EX! 4.00'26.00 oo.oo - .. O'-llQ'I MMONDO LERIW\ 80.00 EXP .. 2187 -~-- ---- .. - 86909.52 .. - ,02.00 . 10.oa :nz.oQ. - :>!' .. ~.00 I" C04::i.l.::tZ ZIM ... 4 04/01 'ARMONDO LERMA exp 4.00 14.00 ! 56,QO 56.00 EXP .2189i 86395.52 ····· 4 <W01 VALDEMERE LERMA 40.00 ^[17] .00 (RI0.00 ~ 575.00 p 2190 85820:52' - . 85386.52 J _04.1)1 FRED SEEHAUSEN.m2. 4().00 14.00 560._00 .. $) 434.00 p 36.00 2191 ' ___ _., 4 o.tlll1 AC 36.00 p ::!102 8f>3S0,52 3G:OO 4 04/01 MICHAEL SISKm1 16.00 14.00 224.00 18 206.00_P 2193 85144.52 ..... ···- 24.00 15.00 360,00 4 04/01 Scottvlopez .33 - · 84817.52 327.00°.P 2°1'94

- . 18 462.00 p 4 04/01 Josul:la ShOeve m-6 32.00 15.1)() 480.00 2195 84372.32 ... 4· 6'J01 m&MeouiD Rtn fVl I= --·!>~<l7 1Rl!ll 113700.!i.3 ' . --~.377:00 iNS" . 83329.53 4 04/01 TEXAS MUTUAL - - -· 4 04/01 .IRS .. : 1175.00 INS 8115U3 v- .. ·- - 1568~ u-----wo.4. ·---... . 82154.53 .. ·- 05/3f ALaERT .URESTl'TXPMR ; 8fi5~18; - ....... 8(1518.41! 5 05/01 ALBERT URESTITXPMR ; .67:72 JLR 1005· ... - . 5 OSI01 AG 36.00 p 2121 ·36.00 80482.46 ........ 5 90.oo:p 05101 VALOEMERE-lERMAEXl 4.00 2Q.OO 80.00. 2125 80392.46 2143. ---· .. 5 05A>1 AG. ·36.()() 36.oo·P 80356.46 ... .J0.00 p - ~ .. 2162 ~- · - 80320.46 ·:> UOIU1 AG -36.uu . -- .. ·-2196 r--· 755-70:46 5 05/01 TX LANDMARK SU~ 4750.00 SUR - ... i .. 75334:'46 5 05/01 ARMON'oo LERMA 16.00 16:00 256.00 20 236.00 p .2198 5 05J0f:ARMONOO LERMA exp i .2.00 14.00 28.00 28:00 p 21.99 75306.46 - . s -10.c>o 17'.'00 ;ooo:oo ::iro.oa F' 'f4T.3·i:40: ()O/Q1 V"LOl::MCRC .LERMI"> .•.Q;J ~~00 36.oo 434.00 p 5 05101 FREO SEEHAUSEN m2 40.00 14.00 '560.00 2201 74297.46 90 .. .. 36.00 p - "---5 -05/01 AG ;.-36.00 2202· 74261.45 ; 24.00. 15.00 .360.00 .. 32-7.00 p 5 0511)1 ~Lopez 33 2203 73934.46 ~ ll&IO~ f;AIC~L !:H~I£ .., 1 '1.oi.00 " .. -00 -4.74U>O ..t2i .. OO "' 220-t !iii '7361.3-~ ··y eo.oo p 05101 VAl.OEMEfU; Ll;RMA EXI 3;00 20.0Q §itoo. 5 ·73453;46 2206 5 05A)1 Scoflv Looei . . ... 1$.00 .15.00 24.o.001 16: 222.00 p ^[2207] 73231.46 -- .. .. - 5 05/01 ~~t- 1S3.0P E 2208 73078'46

,,... .. ~ 9 -'--'20 .. _ 1A.75 :f6.00 24R.00 P· J~O!\A>1 ~ . LER~.ce.; 2209 _]:1113041'1 2.QO 14.00 5, 05Al1 28.00 p 2210 72802.46 - . - -·-- 5 0511)1 AUSTl.N DIST 62.17 E 2213 72740.29 36.oo 5: 05/01 FRED SEEHAUSEN m2 40.00 14.fM! 560,00 go 434:00 p ^[2215] 72308.29 .. -- -·· -- 5 otXIEOiC. 784.01 0 2216 71522.28 05l01 .. .. .. IJt>IUT t=zC11-ttVt 424.00 tNG - 2218 fhnto,;!6 ::J : - - Li! _QS/Ol Josuha Sh~ m..a 222._I>_!) p f8 2219 70876.28 16.00 15:00 .240DO ... 0../01 VALOl;.Ul;IU:; Ll;PUA&;.V:I< .A,00 ~0;()0 ao.oo ·----.--.---- .. - '·· 80.QO p ::1%22 '70'106.!UI '-5 05/01 ilnaram ReariYMiX' 110:00 car .. -= f_;__ - ^[2235] 70086.28 2224 663o3.70 3782.58 JLR 2225 -- 5 05/01 CHASE CARD SEVICt:.5 43"]0 mo -· 610.00 p 121. 2232. 65693:70 5 0~01' VALDEM_ERE LERMA. 731.00 ,~- >--·- >-----· _<vi 00 AAMP 658!;7.'70

>- '5 0.'i/01 A(; 77'.'l.4· ·--.- 1 - - - · 65431.70~ 11:50 14.oo 245.00 19 5 05J01 MICHAEL SISK mt 64915.70 516. p 2236 35.75 16.~ 572:tl0 56 5 05/01 Josuha stioeve m-6. .. , 638.47 E 2237 64277.23 CONTINEENTAL BADEF. ES ' 5 05/01 ... 2237 · - -- ......_._ 2729.64 E -~__Mfil . .§l! 5' 05/01 HOLT CAT · · · - - · 56476.57 ' 5 05/()1.ACT PiPE ~ 3071.02 PlB 2239 ---- ' 2857.8<> FE 2240 5ss1s.11 5 t>SI01 TXPMRFENGE - 55344.81 273;96 ~ 2241 5 05113 V,,,_, GmJNOY I -· 53530.81 1814.00 E 22"4: 5 05tl3 DISEL PUMP SREVICE ... 5307tf.81' ;;s~;oo \llU~ ;ou:.uu -.::iz,\1\1 f' - 5 05/13 VALDEMERE LERMA b U;» 1:i IAKl\"IONUU Lt:KJlllA l)U .zottl 575.00 p 52503.81 105 2246 40:00 17.00 680.00 . 52069.81 36.00 43<t.OO·P 2247 FR,EO SEEHAUSEN m2 ~.00 14:00 56().00 90 .. 5 05/13 - 1179.30''0 2248 50890.51 5 0511.3 DIXIEOIL - . .ltj.Ull t" !>tttl!>4.!>1 o·: OQl:'J3. 'I\!;)' LL4'll ! ... ·- 102.00 p . 3.DO 15.00 12().00 2250 50752:51 5 05113 I lSWltY. lOlleZ 18 ... ·- . 400.00 p' 5 05113 MICHAEL SISK m1 2251 50352.51 32.DD 14.00 448.DO "8 80.00 p - 4.00 :zo.oc. ll5/13 :.VAl.[)tMERE LERMA EXf 2252 50272.51 60.00 5 ~71).00 ,, 22&3. 32.00 >JS.OO £1?-00 ^[30] ~7G$.G1 Ii 'Ollli3 .IC>Ouho Shl'<>Ve> m 6 - ... 49704.51 95.00 p 2254 5 05/1.3 CORTEZ .. · - - · 4922-4.51: 480.00 p 2255 5 05/13 M&M ~.-- <--- 7586 27 JLR . 41638.24' 2256 5 05/13 GUARDIAN INSFORFRE l ! .. !i10.'-o ~§-~P5..!' L_ _ __ . _ _::_ 4.00 14:00 oo;oo;· ' " llSfi') Al.I i:lTATI= . ~1118.7.ol 5 41002.74 051.13 ARMONDO LERMA exp 56.00 ~ 2258 •· 700]10" p -- 2259 :· 40362.74 5 05/13 DIXIEOIL .. .:. ' 'l!66.67 P_:_~- -2260 ' - - - · 36.00 40094.07 FRED SEEHAUSEN m2 24.00 14,00 336;()1) 32 5· 05/13 10Q.OO p -.-.01 2261 5 o5i13 ^[1] VAlO.EMERE LERMA EXI 5.00 20.00 100;0'() ' - 3782;58 JlR 2262 36211.49 5 05113. CHASE CARD SERVICEs; ... ~ .. -. 05113 CHASE CARO SERVICES 3598.64 E 2262 32612.85 5. ·l13' 567.00 p :4().00 16,00 640.00 2263 5 05/13 ARMOt.iDO LERMA 32055.85 ----- -. p 5 05/13 ,ARMONDO lERMAe>q> 5.Q() 14.00 70.00 70:00 -·~ 31985.85 n1;.i.ou IP ~ .. ·50000:00 . -------i!'f4l<T.8"5 ::J U!>ll.) VALUt:MtKt: L.~l'UlllA 1'W.U\I 111.uu ll>tl\l.W 100 *108 5 05113 FRED SEEHAUSENm2 40.00 14:00. 560.oo· 2266 -5000MO· 90 434.00'P 30976.85 35.00 •· 5• 05113 DIXIEOIL 1647.91 D 2267 29328.~ 5 05/t:J AG. -36:00 36.00 p 2268 29~2;94 . - 'i!uu. 0 OOfl;) VL lUU.UO !::At' ; ~192,94 ... 40.00 16.QO -MQ:oo '§5; S<UlO 535.t)(} p i~--- 28657.94 5 05113 JOSUha Shrel/em-6 - --"2272 ___ ..... 420.QO E 2.8237.94. 5 05113 M&MeOUIPMENT .. - · 05113 ALPHA TESTING 451,75 EN<: 2273 5 27761t19 !MH.OQ,P -~ ----- ·-· ~-4.00, ,a:oo 312.00, 'IB.00 6 0Sli3 cRcc·1u:vc1QA 27&22.10 L ____ ·. 2278 go, 434.00 p 5 05113 FREDSCEHAUSEN m2: 40 .. 00 14.00 560.00' 36,()0 27068.19 26916.63 5 0511'3 DIXfEOIL 171:56 p 22005 .. --· v - 26916.63 - .. .. ' "1oo? 6 OSI01 BEXAR COUNTY ... 3.'>00 TAX 7RAA1 A'.'! 6 06/01 AijMONOOLERMA ' llLOO 16.()()i 128.00 108.00 p 2(l 2274' 26n3.63 28.00 EXP. 6 06/()f ARMONDOLERMA 2.00 1:4.00 2275 26725.03 -· 6 06/()1 VL 130 6fl6.00 p 43:00 19.00 !16.00 ' ' 2276 ,____ -26039.63 .. .,.,. . - - llRlmt WI• I IAM i_l:\11111:1 IHtOO t•.l'li1 .224.llll HIS!" p 6 2277 ~~ -- - - - - · 6 Q6103 DIXIE OIL 652.52:0 2279 25199.11 ' - - · - 1-------: .. - ·-36.'oo 6 06!03 AG 36.00 p 2280 25163.11 .. 6'. 06103 .EZORIVE 276.46 EN( 2281 24886.65 , ~06/03 VL--- . 1--· " 6 06/03 /.C.T 2282 24640.55 . -r---{~:~ ~LB 6 UIJ/03 . KUUY U:RMA . g7_ ,____ '2283 .. - - - !li.IJO 113.•• 24443.55

--- ... ~- 100.00 EXP 24343.55 2284 ' · - .__ .. _ - 6 06/03 DIXIEOfl $67.00 0 2285 23756.55\ .. 2286: 6 06/03 INGAAM READY lilX 1511.05 JLR -·T.Z.OQ ,.. ----~245:!0 .. uoit o.oo 13.00 TO.QO ^[0] 00/00 .GRCG RCVE.IM ^[0] ~~11~.~u 6 06/03 CHARLOT CONC - 251.oO'f> 433.84 PLB 2288 21739 .. 86 .. ·-· 6 00/03 VL. 14JlO 19.00 272.00 21.<JO 2289 21488.66 >-·5 06/03 FRED SEEHAU$EN m2 40.00 14.00 sso.oo 36.00 434.00 p 2290 21054.66 ~~: 2.201 -·· 20-4'70:so >--s,-.06~ NAPA ·- 676.0? E . - ·-- ! . - - - · · .. ... 6; 06/03 AG 72,00' p 2292 - ··- 20407.59 VL 2.00 20-l?O 6 06/03 40.00 EXP 2294 20367.59 '.""" 6 OEV03 Ingram Ready-MIX .. _ 071i.05 JLR 2295 19388.64

-- .. -- I - - 19323.64 - 6 OBm~ I VAN GRUNDY .. 65.Mlt= 7".HJR ·! 6 06/03'DYE 1550.00 SUR 2298 1ffl3.64 ·---- -- ' 2403.15 cor. 6 06/03 lrniram ReadY Mii 2299 1537'0.49 .. 6 06103 FRED SEEHAUSEN rn2 40.00 14.00 soo:oo 434.00 p !!9.: 36.00 2300 .. 14936.49 .. 6 ~oi;/()3 ALAN HYDJWJJJCS 211.11 E 2301 14725.32 .. 0 UON.:1 texas rnmual insurance cri noany 3110.00 INS l30Z ; l16l::J,3io! 188.00 p G 00A)3 WILLIAM LEWIS 16.00 1-4.00 224.00 36 2~02 11427,~ I __ ,. ··ss7.7-+ I 2300. ^[1] 10009~.001 6 Q61.E>3 !'CT -~~~ 221.50 10648.08' 2305• 6 D6I03- ALPHA TESTING 00 - 434.00 p 2306 10214.08 FRED SEEHAUSE~. rn2 40;00 14.00 000.00' i 36,00 - ti 06/03 - -2307 0037:46 276.62 D 6 06/!)3 DIXIEQIL __ ,. - ?'los.: -··· !VI ^[00] p -- 0001.49 llMl3 A~ -~nn -- R 1039.95 E 2311 8861.51 6, 06..V3 ASSOCIATEOESuPPLY . .. - 5786.42 BK ..... ,.,,. CONENTAL BaES 2312 ; 3075.09 6, 06/03 CERTAPRO 545.79 p 2313 2528.30 90 36:00 6 00/03 FREOSEEHAUSEN m2 40.00 14.00 560:00 -- .• I - 647.87 E. .. 2314 1RR0.4.1 ... ^[6] 48.73 E 2315 1831.71> 6 06/03 HYORAULIC S. M ~RVIC~ --

·- .. -· '"•• 1831.70 - . ~ 1039.51 E ] . "i]TJ03 'CHASE 1078 792.19 I ' ,-- .. i -··- "'-+ 1143,52 JLR _.,, 1079 7 07/03 US AJWAYSBOB ~56.33 440,00 p -796.33 7 07/03 Josuha.Sht&ve. m;.ij 1080 30.00 16:00 480:00 40

- 60.00 EXP 1081 ·856.33 7 07/03 Vl ··-- 464.00 p -1320.33 7 07/03 \It. ~:'?'Q HU>Q 57(1,00 : 1082' - - 6879.W 7 07/08 GBMBINSURANCE ' INS' 1084 -8200.32· - . ----, . Utiuts ,JQsuna.srneve ~ •o",e;";::l2j lUISO ,£lll.U\J It'-~.: -·· 585.00 p 36;00 19.00 684.00 95.00 -8814.32 7 07/11 vt 1086 -·. 111.00 ExP .07/11 Vl 1087 -8925.32 7 - 7 emu Josuha Shte.ve m-6 32JJO 16.00 512.00. 66' 452.00'P "i:l0.00 ,.. 1089 .'9377.:32 - -.·-. ·- o>o.oo · 't.o.oo .ioo.oo ao.01>" : T, 07111 o1:.u11y Ln""" 10$0 ·S®T.::ll .. 405.00 p 1092 7 07F11 RUDYLEHMA 32.DO · 13.00 416.00 11 -10212.32 --- . : 434;0() p ·10046-32 7 07/1 t ,FRED SEEHAUSEN m_2 40.00 14.00 56Q;OO 90 36:00 1093 -- ·-· 1---, ()7/H R.!W.L COMl<.Z 2000.00 b 7 07/11 DfXIEOIL 1095 -12646,32 - .. -·· '160 .. 00 p ^[1006] 13006.3!! . .. - . i .. -· 1000.00 BK D.7111 FLOOR DIRECT 1104 1 ·14096.32 .. - ' •.. 839.39 E 7 07/13 ASCO 2238 -14935.71, - ' 2301 !

7 07113 ADEL.ANTE CONTRACTC 10596.00 PLB1 RS : -25831.71 l - 7 07/13 Vl 6:rno FXP: ?316 -7!'i.lll'l4 71 .,,. - 100:00 p 16.00 'ifoo 224,00 ~ 7 07113 WILLIAM LEWIS 231.7 -26082;71 .. - ··- 2318 7 07/13 HPLTCAT 657.69 p - 2319 -26740.40 7 07113 AG - i 36.00 p -26776-40 -- - - -··20.00 7; 07/13 Vl ~- 2320 ·Zb796.40 379.QO p 7 07/13 GREG REVEIRA 4?5.0Q 76:()0 35.00 ! 13.:()0 2321 ·27175.40 *109 7 07/13 . FRED SEEHAUSEN m2· .40.00 14.00 550,00 36.oo 434.00 p 90 23'12 ---=2f6o9.40 --- . --~ f----27669.40 -·. 00.00 p -··; . 07113 ARMONOOLl!RMA 7 07113 t=.MELDA CARRILLq_. 2323

.. - 32,00 15.00 480-~ -406.00 p 74 2323 .. ·28075.40 ·- ""\hn..> l.t'~ !:1,;;s!> t' ;.!;jl!4 ·.t:OUO'f.J:l ·- ·- ·• ~ 07113 GREG REVEIRA ,___., -·@13 ACT PIPE 18.l)O 20· 214.00 p -28298.75• 2325 .. .. -·.· '" 137.29 PLB . 2338 -28436.04 ·- s.38,P 7 07113 GENUINE PART$ 2339 -28444.42 --·- 7 07/13 HOL.TOAT 2340 -2,91.:)().47 o~.C):i·p -· 134.4() p 7, 07'13 CONTINENTALBATTERI S -29270.87 2341 ' - ... 880.50 w -ao1sf31 ; 7 07113 SAWS 2342 -- .. --- 1G3.00 i: .. ; 7 07113 iAi:il>O 1()8,25 E 2343 -30259.62 ? 0711, Vi!INCRUNOY ------ .. .. .. t!3+t Q0;422JS2 - I 7 {)7/l3 AUSTIN DIST 144.55 p .. 2345 - 7 07116 JESUS DE!:fOYOS ·30567.17 ! 2346, 1395.00 E -31'962.ff .. 234yr--··· 36:00 p 7 07116 AG ' - 93.00 p ·31998.17 • -- ... .. ... ' ' 7 07116 RUDYL.ERMA 194-90 8.00 11 t ::.l?ll<11 1?.

?~A

-· ·- 36._o() 7 07/:16 FRED sEEHAUSJ;:N ~2 40.00 14,00 560.00 ' -·~.OOP 2349 '32525.17

--r ~07116 VALDEMAR LERMA EXP ~ 100.00 •p 5:00 10Q:OO 2350 -32625:-ff 36, 1 07116 WILLIAM LEWIS 16.00 14.()0 !ll4,00- 188.00 p 2351 -32813.17 ... ·-·- 7 07/16 $cotly Lopez 11>.oo 240.00' 32 208.00 p 2352 . -3302lJI. .. - 7 07/16 Vl 646.00 p 2353 -33667.17 ... ·-· -· 7' ^[07116] Josuna srueve m-6 510,00 p -34177.17 ~-00'16.00 ~,00 50 2354 - - 7'. 07/16 AG 72.00 p 2356 -34249.17 .. -· 1 07116 TEXAS PMR SKID STEE 3200.00 E 2357 -37449.17 .. , I U/110 trulJUl::I I t<l::MINAIUK:S., Tl!S.60 1£ l!35S ""2361-- ... •.;)t ;JQ( · " ' ~ ~07116 FRED SEEHAUSEN m2 40.00 14J)0 561).00 90 36.00 434.00 p -38001~97 .. 2362,-- ' 7 07116 ;WILLIAM LEWIS 188,00 p '16.00 1.4.00 1224.00 ^[36] -38189.97 - 7 07116 vc-. - ·--· 40,00 1a.oo 720.00 90J)Q .. 630.00 p 2365.' -38819.97 ... ··- :i:r+.~ r ^[7] 07(1& ACT --- ^[2306] ·393T<t.tl1 ^[1] 07116 ALAN ttYORAUUGs 884.39 PLB 40258.901 2371 -- 7 07i11:) CH~!; CARO 4234.oo E 2374 -44492:90: .. 260,00 - 07/23 Sconv Lopez p 7 ~.oo tlJ,00 512.00 52.00 200• "2376 -44752;9()] ·- . ^[7] 07J?'Q VAtnl;;~ I r:~MA 1000 ?0-00 900()0 ' Ql'P: 2'?.77 'l;orJOOO .DQ&2.CIO ~1¥.l-00 287:00 p 7 07123 RVDYLERMA . 24.00 25.00 2378; 25000.00 14760:10 7 07123 WILLIAM LEWIS 224.0() 188.()() p 16.00 36 -- 2379 57.00 14.629.10 600.00 p ·-·- 40.00 17.00 (J80.00 7 07123 VA.!DEMERE LERMA 89 2360 4.07 14()33.17 165.00 p 7 Q7/23 KE1TH_:>:~1iA!JSENin2 8.00 180.00 15 2381 13868.17 ...,...uu,P 7 011~ .... [40.W 114.w tllHJ;Ull 00 23221 36;UU --U43W 7 07123 WIRE FOR COM TO RICt IE 4526.25'E 23222 8907.92 .... : 1 n11'~ 'f!A~ i:nA riA'~v~. J~A=RO=A=----r-· · ·~-~~~.--------~~~00:00° P !22l:!l:!3 O?o?.01:1 ·,, B 08119 ~SEARS ---+--+--+--l-----'--l--+----l!~~906-=-:.56~:BK=--+------'-c:..;..::.:38~,;;,7_t~~~~~:~~~~:7,.::...8;;;;0~1-=.~36~

7351 36 ·-"'---------1---1----t-·····-..J----l----l---;..._.......::::::;:.:;~c...:_1---·- 8 08/08.RAYGoMEZ 450.00 E _ _L __ 1_02_5__,__ ___ -+--~""'· ·,..,,· =' ! ' 30.00 P 7321.36 8 08/08 JQE:Ui.RRICA , ; 2360 s 08/()8 l.AM;o.:;r;.:· Fi::,,:U~c· :.:::K:;.,,B~i:t~O~K=e=R-1--...;.....,f----',--+-~--_r-_.-. -+---+---·.f..:-=QO!\;;.;. ;;.,·m=. ,+1==--+--...;;;2"'-aJl9'-:.-x+----+----8llif.;,.2,;..1."'98"" : ~= ~M~~ . . .. ·+---1-----1'-··=~====~==~===--+-·--.:::l-·-_,-?z.;~~m~o~~-..::.00~. ~~~~~;;_;:::=:=2~2"";8~86;5.;...\-- '·· ::::._--+---c:~~~='-':i:~· 8 08108 JESUS QEHOY::_. :_::S::...: --+--+-~--:-l--1. --+____,. -.t------"----'--+---+-! -- ·~45"-o_:oo_· ·.,...E_4 __ 2_~~ j -·~---l---'59;..;;..;....71=.36:.;::_ I a 08108 N:J . 36.00 P 2384 i .. _ 5935.36 ! 8 08I08 scorrv LOPEZ

100.00 p 2386 2835.36 600.00 cot. 8 08l08 NEW LEAF HOMES 2.~38=.,,l6,......... __ --J ____ 22'"'.3"""5.=36-=-1 8 08/08 OYE ENTERPRISES --2388' 322.86 1912.50 SUR s o&Jos E2 bRIVE ··· ~--1---+-----+---<---, ----+~ -=-309~.eo~s""u"'='R+----'2::::3:7as=+------t--"""""13"",2~0 • tl U1111Jt1 l)IJl..11:'. UIL 4WIJ.00. 0 2390 -3986,80

i 8 08/08. CORTEZWASTE 190:00 FM 2391 4176.80 l--.::..\-~~~~=-~:::.:.:::..:__-4--+~-+--t--+--+---+----if--....:..:;~;;+..2f-----c~:i.-l-- .. ---l-------'--~ 1--..::.8-i-,,08~I08~~C~PS-----"··--+---+--+ __ .j.___-l--+--~··-·-+----+--18_.4=24-=-FM.,.....-i- __ 2_3_92_,_ ___ ..__ -4195.22

s OtWS 1NGRAM 344.00 co~ 239.3 ___ . -4539 .. 22 -·-o '0011b ALDCf\TMC~OOOQ C· --l----l-----4---.- ... -- 11:lb.UU.f' Lc'IH4 •;oJUU't,.£.£ 8 08115 FREOSEEHAU$EN m2 4D.OO 14.0Q 580.00 ... =36~:0~0+---1-....:.;.434::;::.:.;.00::;.+;·P~1-----;239~5;+· ---- ... --+---"-e'"'=o9="s:.:.::.2:.:;.,2 90 8 08/15 PG , -36:0Q. ··---1---=3:.::s...:..O.::.<i'...:.~P~--.1.-. ----~~2-=3=.:..:96:.::::.i..i.._-_-_-_-.:._·_···:----=-a=134~_2-=-12 8 08115 Josuha Shreve m-6 · · · 40.00.116.50 000.00. 50 t 600.00: P 2397 ··· -6734.22

:oao4.ff ^[11] 01111s \MLLl.l\MLewts: oo.oo oo.oo >too.oo 2::0.aa r 20!» 8 08/15 VALDEMEijE LERMArn-14().00 19.00 760.00 85· 675'00 P 2399 -765922 f--8.,._. 1 - , .~os~11~5+t.o,....._ ~UIS~LE=RMA=""o---~· ---+4""'0~.00== .. +11=s=.oo'::-+-:640:=-,oo=+-=a-=-o r----+-... --i---+---'4:.:.70.:;;;:o·o~"=p~1--___;;2;c_:4,.::...oo=-+-- · .s12s.2~ 8; 08115 VAL.DEMERE LERMAm~Ho.00;13.00 520.00 50 ... -+-~-+--,-1-0.~00-i.....Ex-p-1----24...;,0::;_11--- ~823,9.22 e: 08115 SCOTTY LOPEZ ?1 nn.1.tnn ?.!WOO # $4(]!:1 - - - - -1 - -.. a_.a10.:i:i 61l0.00 p 8: 08115 GUZMAN PAVING ' 2000.00 PAV 2403. -111819.~2 8~ 08115 GUZMAN PAVING 2404 5235.00 PAV -16054.22

f---8+-·0S122 FRED SE;_t;HAUSEN m2 40.00 14Jl0 560.00 ·2405 -16438.22 90.... 36.00 4.34.00 P 8 08122 "''"""" ^[1] o"""" -36.00 ···-'---511-'-o-o"-o 1-P- ·-----,=.:.._c::.rrT"-l--- -+--~.1=7flRA=-=,? : 8 08/22. VALQEMAR LERMAEX--P-+,s-2-.o-0+1~6-.50-+-5-2B-:OD .......... _~5(}..,...._ __ . 1-="'-"'"-1----l-: -""'11'"'0'-'-.oo=+p-+--=2408 - - - -+ - - :17178.22 8 08/22 VALDEMAR .LERMA 675.00 IP 5.00 20.00·100,00 2409. · -17853:22 8 os/22 lowLERMA ·· ·· ·· 40.00 1900 100.00 85 _ _.__---+--=2:.:;a·2='-.oo=.:::.i..;...P---+---=2:.=41'f.i.-._--~---1-a1-':i-.s.~22.,.-j a QBJ22 Jos.uha $M!Ve. m.e 40.00 16....;;.00c;:.i..;S40,.=...::..:.oo'=-'. '"'". -...;;00.;...1-----J,--....... --~L...-CtfL..·oo., PE. 24i2 -18613,22 ~

""·vu 2413 ·18732.22' ^[6] Olllii!ZSt't:eiALIYIKAILt:K~ 24.UIJll:li.uulJ12.00 JO *110 8 08122 ACf - ---+-_-_-_- -1902-""f.95 14.00 295.73 PLS- 2414

08/29 ALPHATESTING 1448.1:J TES 2415 .20476.08 - - - - -+ - - - ---+----+--.......,---+---1------'---~1----L---'----·-+------l 08.129 ASCO 387.90 E 2416 -20043.98 00/l& CONTJNEHT"h. a.ATTl:.RI 0 ~ , .. ---J--+------· ii!4u,oo t :t41] . JiiOOU.uu 01no.U<!

17s_oo r 1--2.4so 33"109."4~.j 081!!0 Cl-IRIG CARCIA 1--....+-·.:::~:9;::0~1:+~:,;:A::.;. ~~ll'""OL=-cO=NE~----+---1---1---1------i~__,_ _ __ _ L ~:!i ~ 2454 -· ::~i 2Tf:34.64' 10/01 ~f.1UTWL 15Qf.()Q INS; l---+~1~ru~o~1~R~K~P~F--=~===----+--f--+--+-----+--,.+--~---' ~:xl~1~A~1~·R11::+;,R~~=l----=-::-==-?+------+--~ ~~.·6300 11/01 US POST OFFICE 7.37 EXP ·'"-1_..1_0-'-9+------+---~"""'.::..:SS="-'.63 J 11101 BEXARCIOUNTY 20.00 TAX. 1104 565:63) 11/01 E!EXARCIOUNTY 65.00 TAX 1107 1500.-631 11/01 EZ DRIVE ----·-,1=39~.20=+S=!J~.R=+. ,__-._- ·-...,,.~,.-,,4~=7=+-------1--·=7004,§4) 2458 9364.<12.

l---+-+11¥'10~14-C'='lP~S~~----+--+----+-----1---+----1---1-----'7.40~.S2~F'M 11101 SAWS +---+--l--->---+----=ce5=='7:--::,16 W ^[2459] 17511.45! 2400~00 slGr · ·· · =2~460~-----~1=11::...,1-,-1.~45='1 1----+-1""110..;.1~AM--=E..;_R1'--CA~N~.s,..,1GN~AL====-::===-:===:---1,... 11101 IRS - - - - 11.a7.94 i ·~-+---+---.-~--564~ .. -=-3.-=51,.-t;T~AX=.t-- ·-2·=4=5; 1 2663.75' 11/01 IRS 8~.19 TAXi 2462

~22u1 \ 11/01 CAPITOL ONE l 1441.40 EXP 2463 1----1-~1',,-110~.1"-+=B~K--~------+---+--+--1-----+- ----- t-· -· ·-·---.--~~12=2~3~,3=1+,B;;,.K:;,_+, ^[1] -~24..,.;64~---+--- --- o.ool 0.00 i 11101 2465 i tJ t . i4titi l---+~1-==1101~f---------·-+~ -_-~_,,_ _ _,__ _ _,__---I-----. ·-------·"···--_,__ __ ___,'"=p-1----2=~=5=7 +-----+---· -o.oo I 11111 IJ'.W 11/01 322318:37

·=E=R=R+1~4~01~2=5~.76-=-1---.......,,;;,,~

C:f'ltR f---t----+--------1'---+--+---+--- :._·a"'"~~l=§· ,1;,~""'.AL,----\---__.,.1604=-c""'t6,..,,;09=+---l··--· .. -- ... BK 21904.70 ·--t---l----1f--_,....-f---¥.H:;IO:;,.L-+-----l-----c;6oo:f1 :20·=-=-i--1----___,1-----+ SAV -20000.00 -------+---!-~--- . -···-· -+----1-Tc..:;Oc..:.T'-'1--.Al-=--N,.:,,GO=~E=--_.;,.;16 0 ~1945.90 322361.99 - 1---+----J1----------+---+---1---l----l-'...T0.:::.11'.:.;'·A..:;:..cCA::;,, . ..:.::S:;,H.:.... ,___,___ -+----------t----l--+---1-----l~SGPE!;;!N~•T~.- I 322318.37

·-+----11---+;:BALAN~·~· ±l~GE·~~--l--~ 1 • ·--44~.64=·+-------- t-·-·-· . ······- .3223!1!~3? ·-· CHEQK BOOK ----i 1---r---t---------t--+---+-,.--+----+=BA=-~=·LAH :..:i-:-:C=-=E=--.+i __ ..,.__;~---l-~---·i-·· I · -+ - - - - - ' : i ' it

JLR

1--+--.J.--======n~~g:t==~ SPEftl- ; c ----+:.=.::-- *111 t-~-+--l--------+--+--+--+--J::P~'A~Y~Rg;;DL~L~k--1--.:,.;;71221.46 C ; 7122f46....,.- ·-+---i~CO~t::.=iw...:.:TRUC=:.:T:.i,:O::.:N.:.__1_...:1~5Wf:36 C · 15171.36 1---t----+------·-=-~~1=_~~~"=-~~:~-=-

TAX

18595.89 C ;ucnt>.l)O/\., .;JJO :.>.oo tl.IUI' Mt.NI OFF 3031.89 C --+---+----+- ·-+~B;::K~=---+----1. _-.. _· ·~9oo~.0~0::. C -+,,__,,.--+-----1-- WA:TI R 2597;6f)"C 2597'66 --~ JLR 43315'.63 JLR =-i----+--_4_33_15.:63 I~ FEES 1001.00'C ., 10if1:00 1042.15iC ,,.____,, _ __ __,_.c.,;;..o,,c:· N,;'C . 7()42.15 J=ti;;:L'r Mii.it.i - 4A0:00.+-----11----·- MQ.00. C

l---+---t------..,..-----l---+---l-----'---l.f:....':E~N~C E ."-' .. ....---+---2~115~7-.80--C-· _.__.265i60 !~~ . =~:~~,~~ 1_4.=c56=-7..c:.7...:.0+-___ ,, __ _ -·--------+-...,.,t--+--+--..:.,'·1~rc<g.!oT-1----l-----t-_;;504~&A~.1bl3'..j.!Cb<__ .·:.·:~o..~a'~.1=3-+-----"-------

.ENG

3818.75 C -~=-'-='+----------i ;-..;~·--+--+----------- 9735.00 C . PAV 9735.00 ~~-·--· -----------r--+-~+---+-----r.;.:s,~G~N+----+--lf--,2;:40.;o:;:.;;oo:;+;;c:-.1i...-2;:400~.~oo:.i...---'------ .. - 2217~0& i t---t--t-----'-----41---t--+--+---':'!!:1R;;S-:...· --1------4--- 2217.08 TAX

. 4296.35 G 4296.35 1t'AV 1----1----1---~-----+--+---ll---+----i;~P.;::LB~--i----~ 23165.16 C 23""'1'-=6"""5.-16-1---~- ; CK ~I---~ ---1-___,:_t0_TAl.:...::i---+-~--k3223=,.;;18.37 182,88().75 35380.67; 43315.63' . -· 3Z'.l311f.37 , .. ·-~·--·· ·-~--- .BANI< CHAR< ES 44.64 C IJLR l- --t---+-----..,---+--+--+-~=-11------,--,--+-~-+-~---l'---3223-...:.es:or · -··- -1-----4----i-=-=--·-· ·

_.,,,. __ _,__+---+----l===:+--....ji-----· - - - - - - -> - - - - - OONI TRVOT ON f&2860.TO · 1----+--___,1-----~-......._--t---+--+---+-~~'Nc=S.::..:U=-·+--tAN-'Gc=:E-J.c ... -~---'-=1"9~32"'_4..,9_..i_-1------l----+-- JR ' 43315.63 ------- ' tAX . · -· - ___ ,__.,,..,35380==· =·,57== . .-.--+------1----+--.. - - - - l---t----11---------+---J.--' '"-· . 1---~·-- 1-----··-----·-·---- ... -·--<-----11--EN_.Gc:;.: -+------r------·1- 3816.75

OFF . TOTAL .322363.01 '. 182880.75! 35380-67 43315.63 . ... l. - --·-··-~ . l .. , l . . -. l. 322~:1()1

Read the detailed case summary

Attorneys for Appellants:

II. BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS, PENDING:

Burton Al. Kahn,

UJ

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........ . .. .............. .... ......... ......... ..... ........

B. TEX. CIV. PRAC.

STATUTES AND RULES

TEX. CIV,

Xl

TEX.R.APP.P.

favor of Appellee.

Course of proceeding.

and Burton Kahn, ("Kahn") breached his fiduciary duty.

the temporary injunction order was signed on December 18, 2014

CR108.

Disposition Of The Case,

2014.

Pendens on it and could not be used for funding.

Supp.A 2RR103._

State.

2

Crest (Joabert Property) in North east San Antonio Texas ..

original petition funds were earmarked to go to Joabert ..

3RR97

Supp.A 3RR 81.

lEXH 309-355

once at closing on December 6, 2007

one time I did."

lEXH 335

positive of the lower 2.

not my signature

4RR150-151

4

Supp.A 4RR136

5

Supp. B 3CR 249

1RR102

ownership on October 22, 2013.

of it when he asked Kahn in Email dated February 18, 2014

6

family trust.

transfer a computer company.

does not have the original stock certificate .

Supp.A 2RR37

Burt Kahn.

Supp.A 5RR32

Supp.A lEXH 384,

of August 8, 2,007.

Supp.A lEXH 384,

Puerto Verde, Inc. 1000. is written in pencil .

specially flown in to San Antonio from Canada for the injunction hearing.

2RR39

to wonder about- about some criminal activity myself'

merits is to be held on May 12, 2014.

hearing was held for a Motion for Sanctions. Appellee' s First Motion For

8

Supp.B 3CR 229.

Pozza Ordered trial on the merits of the lawsuit is set for May 12, 2014.

on

Therefore, we now adopt the rule of the

(Second) of Judgments

counsel. This is a legal issue and is to be reviewed de novo.

Edwards Aquifer Auth.,

If

County Underground Water Conservation Dist.,

When construing statutes, we use a

Partners, L.P. v. Duenez,

2006).

MEDICINE,

Low,

contentions in a pleading.

11

322, 813 331 (1979);

Smithwick,

Hosiery

offensively, the trial court must consider the

Hosiery

329-30;

see also Avila v. St. Luke's Lutheran Hosp.,

Buller,