vaming required was violated, my "confession" should have been excluded which in turn, which in turn my friend, turg indiriment, showed have been been bimmel since it was based on my "confession" to Irisut that I'm an indirgent of Hender, I know that I suffer from mental issues but this so divided clearly in a each multitude there whe is the state of this therefore I feel that the nelerant from my

*2 فعcience became without any "corression" : there as no physical evidence providing the state the right to prosecute me as it as stated in Mark evidence there was indivuly at the existence but my wife and myself which at the Sduffrent statements from baseline. Issues (state without bissecties) state have to insist on on the charges. after my "corression" was entered (variation) by Pass code and rules culted Chapter 3: "Purpos that is Positive" - Pass lobuntainess standard and purposes "unresectable" to Positive" after chapters 8.146 to 8.149.

*3 You can contact the attorney who handled my approval "to ask what the orders of my inter- vision which will should be collected in the morning. Articles. my next letter will be the wyprene count of the became of home the required (excluding order which to have in 1905). You response to the letter which is ready to preciated Don't you DolmDaw'Le. MS. KNISTINA MASEN A ssistant DISTRICT at Tuscory PAGO, AND COUNty T EARS ATUENTY TOWS SAXETE SURVEY TOWS SAXETE SURVEY TOWS SAXETE

*4 EXPANTE Y GARRA 629502021497 (TEXCRIMAGIITE, ipeAfective ${235}^{\text{st}}$ TARKE Attorney was Ineffective for NIT inuestlyating the Defendant s case and 7Aicins to Mesent Evience of the Behaff of the Defendant Attorney of D NIT Mesent Resucrs Man EXPANte mفعin festing EXPANTE GARFIELD 627502214 (TEXCRIMAGIITS ins uffient evinence Mobilence Stoning my Envlvement in this dFERSE. Evidence Shuts Glutrion of stine cases ansReces

*5 enticle 3: 61 warnings Required - Government must give a suspect the following 4 admenishments Petse any words of a across Constituting on "intensipass" com. geyin 1. he is the has the right to remain silent 2. anything he/she says can, is wintering the in court 3. he/she has the right to consent with a lawyer and have the lawyer with him/her during intersypation 4. If he/she is indigent a lawyer with a appointed to represent him/her minister v. 22, gujina 384 U.S. 436,468 to 472 865, cT1602, 1625 to 1626 (1966) it any of the first 3 to 1002, the warnings are not included a resulting confusion must be excluded mingly lecun to be met P