Case Information

*1 23 February 2015

Mr. Christopher A. Price Clerk of the Court Court of Appeals, First District 201 Fabuain 57 HOUSTON, TX 77002 - 2066 RE. GERALD E. COLLERT v TOLS, et al, and U.T. m.B., etal Court of Appeals Cause No. 01-14-00785-CV Thial Cluse No. 76482 I Brief for Appellant

Dear Mr. Price: I think you for your prompt response regarding my January 26, 2015 conmy wickets you received by Jauctary 29, 2015 that was generally in reference to my direct appeal, but more spectiably, the fact that this prison's meilroom supervisor stated in an I-66 my brief was mailed 01.07 .15 and your white card stated my brief was fited was 15 or over 6 day after it was allegedly placed in U.S. trial service. Your response failed to answer my most important and more specific questal's contained in my January or, 2015, and those in the Jenuary 26, 2015 letter(s) that asked:

1. did the court receive the evidence of the conspiracy by

*2 Combination emitted from the Clerk's Record I submitted in my Appendix H as exhibits $A,B,C,F,G,H,I$ , and S, see copy of or-druis letter attached. 2. whether my brief was reappeared to be offered in any of the following ways: (a) handwriting different on any page; (b) pages missing; (c) content in coherent; and 3. if my brief wasfaced or emailed to you, the only logical and reasonable explanation for you receiving mail from this country to Harris County in oneciology, that would be a podictic proof that my so called "Reinlbeed LeGAL MAIL" is and has bebin tempored with.

The improper forum change, fiting my complaint in the 412 th district court, rather than the 23 rd district court it was addressed to, the 34 days that lapsed from the time it was placed in Indigent Supplies for postage before it was stamped fited, Brezona County's district Clerk's attempt to say 1 m crazy and don't know where I filed my work, and being wrongfully convicted of a crime I didn't commit there is no confidence left that persons in this prison or the judicial system, or have enforcementake havocable varacious, or play by their buw rules, or federal law. Theseforyve my persistence, but it is absolutely necessary in this situation, I am not secure in knowledge, or confident in my controlled and restricted minority status and position, that the State and its actors are not continuing the conspiracy. I would sincerely appreciate confinnationlie, copies of what the court has to review) the court is in possession of exactly the documents I submitted for their review.

*3 Euclosures: or. on. 15 Lethe to Chostophor A, Asive cc. R. Ellis s. A.R

*4 29 January 2015

Mr. Christopher A. Rine Clerk of the Court Court of A gnestic Fire District 301 FANHIN St. 4901st0m, 76 79002:2066

Mr. Gerald E. Gilbert v TALJ, et al and U. i.m. B. et al Court of Agenots Cause no. 01-14-00995-CU Triad Cause no. 76482 I Brief for Appellant

Dear Mr. Rine:

My brief for Appellant was completed and ready for mail on 01.05.15. I signed and dated it for 01.0115 in anticipation of Law Library's ditatory procedure. I was in the law library (Hansey 2 unn) at approximately 12:15pm under authority of Aurora Leechr to use their large stapler to bind the brief. I asked Leechr at 12:30pm or.05.15 if I could please get the kirt enveloes and mail my legal documents. She replied "No the lawin has already been submitted, and we'll just wait with tomorrow 01.06.15.

On 01.06.15 I was laid in for the 7:45 am regular session, and submitted as I 60 (argues: turn) at 7:50am for extra time to extend my session an add-

*5 itional hour (6:45-10:45am), and a layin for 10:45 amfor thom to give me the wiri envelaes I needed to moil the biot to the cour and the diffidontis te pre sen totion. See otorhed layins. This effe tivily delayed "My" Anilized Legal Mail" that is not suppose to be delayed at all, a blay and nupbe bome, unereessarily.

Because of their diest eccess to my "Aivilized Legal maily" Lirch, Law libing superiow and Dinali banez mailcom Superiour, and Warden Mossbarger, a potertial combination that may have Commanobured my original Complanar addresed to the 23 rd district cour, and re directed it to the 412 th district court, may have initerated my Brief and going through it. The handwriting on the envelige will be diffint from the samples of mine you bave, if they did. That's assurning the corresponstence I we sent to you, of tially reached you. And I am concemed that the combination may bave remove parts of appendir A evidence en hibits that were abserinfrom the clerk's forced, and have wat amid my congtanit, and request still bounsion been produced. Or the contert of the brief in my bave been changed, as the irterzaria County Distirt clerk, and that potertial combination did in changing my form ctivice improperly. The following is a list of the evidence en hibita I suban that with my Eirif for Agatilant:

1. etibit A os February 2014 fouretitter to Mary fork schubert of the 23 rd district court regarding filing my original complain, citation, with Secretary of State, and TOC, and b. i. A. B. that was submitted with the original complaint absent from clerk's records:
2. echibit B 06 February 2014 letter to Mary Frek-schubert to add motion for Reliminary Injuvition to complaintadd, I said evidence of whiter I original filed my complaint and choice of founs:
3. echibit C. I-60, 03.0744 regarding Legal mail "no record" of
4. echibit F II April 2014 To Khorida Rarchak, inter also, please send me whiter document that was issued, ordered, and filed that changed venuesfrom 23 rd district court to the 412 th district court;
5. echibit G. 15 April 2014 letter to "The Hounable Ben Harduy Judge"

*6 regarding my original complaint being fitted in his court, offering experienced with a liquidition Judge during criminal trial, and after also, fact that I did not request a change of venue. 6. exhibit H April 26, 2014 telle from Rhondo Baillic practising

• Your case was initially fitted in the 412th District Court, and not the 23rd District Court, there was not a document that was issued, ordered or fitted that changed venues, that was fitted in this case. 9 exhibit I, 3d June 2014 letter to W. Edwin Don may why my forum choice was changed, and issue preliminary injurition and of he did. He case must have been switch to his court by combination to ensure H would not see the light of day "CR.189-14"
• exhibit J, 0ffender Broce and Limb Bass for back broce issued for my back injures If any of this is missing my point is apostolically proven, and it was deliberate and urantion.

Please inform me if any of the above mentioned drafts in a univerapatus act, and omissions of legendemain has occurred, and those documents are missing. I have the oriquette and the court words them for review in this case.

Cureard B. Eutbert G. S. Cresson

20: 3A2 RE

*7