Now comes, (Pro se) Applicant; Tracy G ibson #1436824, currently presiding at; Stiles Unit 3000 Fm 3514; Beaumont, TX 77705-7635, and "obiects" to this courts mandate, written order to dismiss without prejudice: to applicants or isinal writ habeas corpus art. 311.07 that was filed August 200, 2007. Since then, applicant has had to file subsequent art 311.07 as to how information was ablated in presentation to applicants "awareness." Furthermore, applicant is an indigent applicant E see previously filed informa pauper is J, and

*2 applicant has never been issued a court-appointed attorney to represent him; or be assigned a court official who could retrieve irreductable documents of material of fact that would support applicants claims. Therefore, applicant gives the following allergations to support his claims as follows: i) Applicant alleges the trial court held the "hunc Pro tunc" proceedings on 16-15-07 Esee trial courts doclet losses 3 outside of his presence because applicant was incarcerated in Texas Department of Criminal Justice-TDcJ at the Torres Unit in Dondo, TX. 2) Applicant alleges the trial court did not "not if" him or his court-appointed attorney; Mr. Gene Caldwell, who represented him during his sentencing hearings on 5-2-07 Esee"Plea borgain" in cause no. E149020073. No affidavit has been given by the court-appointed attorney to testify of to the "botification" of the trial courts "hunc Pro tunc proceedings". 3) Applicant alleges due to the "lock-of-compliance and-cooperation" to correspond with him by his only means of communication to the courts by use of the United States Postal Services, it was not brought to his attention of the films of the "Hunc Pro tunc order"

*3

until he received legal mail from his trial court on or about February 1-April, 2012; E see offenders legal-mail los of institutions). 4) Applicant alleges that TDCJ-Records Division did not receive the "trial courts post-conviction order: "Nunc Pro tunc" until 5 years after it's issuance; from the 145th Superior Judicial Court of Nacogdoches County, not only does applicant require this court to subpoena an affidavit / interessatorie from TDCJ-Records Division but also for TDCJ to submit copies of offenders "Time-slims" that are located in his innate likelyrecords.

Conclusion

Applicant, Tracy Caibson * 1430824 ; asserts and declares he can not provide copies of his 'objection' because of his indigent status to his trial court. Also, applicant can not produce documents that the "Respondents' are in possession of without a court-appointed attorney who can retrieve them. With the appropriate representation, I PRo se applicant can submit to this honorable criminal court of appeals as to materials of fact that will disclose controverted a previously unresolved issues of fact.

*4

Prayer and Relief

Applicant, Tracy Colbsaw $1450824$ , seeks the prayer and relief that the Criminal Court of Appeals jurisdictional authority to exercise and grant him a court-appointed attorney to represent him in the matters of discomery; to have Respondents produce documents that they are in possession of and have them presented to the Criminal Court of Appeals that is irrefutable evidence that shows this honorable court proof of all controverted and previously unresolved materials of fact. Applicant should be allowed to not have ladies attached to his art. 811.07 application and should be permitted to continue the review and process of his 811.07 grounds because of his trial courts' resilience.

Inmates Declaration

Applicant declares and certifts under penalty of perjury that all facts and information provided is true and correct to his faith and beliefs. Also, because of applicants indigent status has only been able to provide a true and exact copy of the fittings of his written objection to this criminal court of

*5 Appeals order to dismiss without prejudice applicants state with hobias carpus act. &; 11.07 application. Respectfully submitted and executed by me, Jusey R. Alston , on this 15th davol June, 2015.