Appellant, Isaac Gonzalez, proceeding pro se, attempts to appeal the May 20,

2015 decision of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure in cause number WR-64,680-03. Specifically, the Court of Criminal Appeals “ denied without *2 written order the application for writ of habeas corpus on the findings of the trial court without a hearing.”

On August 3, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the order from which the appeal was taken was not an appealable order, and requested correction of this defect within ten days or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has failed to respond to the Court ’ s directive.

As a general rule, an appeal in a criminal case may be taken only from a judgment of conviction. See Workman v. State , 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961). However, there are certain narrow exceptions. Wright v. State , 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App. — Dallas 1998, no pet.) (listing exceptions). The order appellant complains of is not a judgment of conviction nor does it fall within any exception to the general rule. See id. Moreover, this court has no jurisdiction in criminal law matters pertaining to habeas corpus proceedings seeking relief from final felony convictions. See T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . A NN . art. 11.07 § 3 (West, Westlaw through Ch. 46 2015 R.S.).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to respond to this Court’s notice , is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. Pending motions, if any, are likewise DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM Do not publish.

T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 3rd

day of September, 2015.

2