History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rashad Ramon Medlock v. State
06-15-00135-CR
| Tex. App. | Oct 28, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-15-00135-CR RASHAD RAMON MEDLOCK, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 20134066CR2 Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss *2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 14, 2015, Rashad Ramon Medlock was convicted by a McLennan County [1] jury of harassment, [2] sentenced to 180 days’ incarceration, and fined $2,000.00. The sentence and fine were then suspended, and Medlock was placed on eighteen months’ community supervision. Medlock perfected his appeal from this conviction by timely filing a notice of appeal. However, on August 21, 2015, Medlock appeared before the trial court and waived his right to appeal from “any Judgment, Sentence or other appealable order” entered in this matter before the date of the waiver. Consequently, the trial court certified that Medlock had waived his right of appeal, and Medlock signed the trial court’s written certification.

This Court is required to dismiss an appeal if, as in this case, the trial court’s certification correctly indicates that there is no right of appeal or that the right of appeal has been waived. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d).

By letter dated September 24, 2015, we notified Medlock, through counsel, of this potential defect in our jurisdiction and afforded him an opportunity to respond. We received no response from Medlock that altered the jurisdictional analysis in this case.

*3 In light of the foregoing, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice Date Submitted: October 27, 2015

Date Decided: October 28, 2015

Do Not Publish

[1] Originally appealed to the Tenth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 73.001 (West 2013). We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Tenth Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 41.3.

[2] See T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 42.07 (West Supp. 2014).

Case Details

Case Name: Rashad Ramon Medlock v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 28, 2015
Docket Number: 06-15-00135-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.