History
  • No items yet
midpage
Templeton Mortgage Corporation v. Gary M. Poenisch
04-15-00041-CV
| Tex. App. | Mar 6, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*0 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 3/6/2015 2:41:57 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk *1 ACCEPTED 04-15-00041-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 3/6/2015 2:41:57 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas No. 04-15-00041-CV TEMPLETON MORTGAGE CORPORATION , Appellant

v. Michael MIDDLETON , Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas Trial Court No. 10-422-A Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding RDER O T H ONORABLE OURTH C OURT OF PPEALS :

EMPLETON M ORTGAGE ORPORATION , Appellant responds to this Court’s Order to file a

response presenting a reasonable explanation regarding timeliness of its Notice of Appeal. On October 15, 2014, the trial court in this matter signed a final judgment in Cause Number

10 -422A Middleton v. Templeton Mortgage Corporation, et al. On November 13, 2014 Appellant timely filed in the trial court with the Kendall County

District Clerk a Motion for New Trial. Such filing was done in accordance with TRCP 5, such

being commonly referred to as the Mail Box Rule. Appellant’s Motion for New Trial should have

been filed by November 14, 2014 to be timely. On November 13, 2014 Appellant deposited in the

United States Mail its Motion for New Trial. See attached Exhibit “A”, such being the supporting

documents regarding the Motion for New Trial having been timely mailed to the Kendall County

District Clerk. *2 3. The Motion for New Trial was sent by first class U.S. Mail, with the correct postage, to the

proper address for the Kendall County District Clerk, bearing the USPS postmark of November

13, 2014 and was received by the Kendall County District Clerk within ten days of mailing. As

such, in accordance with TRCP 5, Mail Box Rule, Appellant’s Motion for New Trial was timely

filed on November 13, 2014.

4. With Appellant’s Motion for New Trial having been timely filed, Appellant’s Notice of

Appeal was due on or before January 13, 2015. Appellant timely filed in the trial court with the

Kendall County District Clerk a Notice of Appeal on January 12, 2015, such filing was done in

accordance with the TRCP 5, Mail Box Rule. Appellant’s Notice of Appeal should have been filed by January 13, 2015 to be timely. On

January 12, 2015 Appellant deposited in the United States Mail its Notice of Appeal, such notice

was sent U.S. Certified Mail. See attached Exhibit B, such being the supporting documents for

the Notice of Appeal having been timely mailed to the Kendall County District Clerk. The Notice

of Appeal was sent by certified first class U.S. Mail, with the correct postage, to the proper address

for the Kendall County District Clerk, bearing a USPS postmark of January 12, 2015 and was

received by the Kendall County District Clerk within ten days of mailing. As such, in accordance

to the TRCP 5, Mail Box Rule, Appellant’s Motion for New Trial was timely filed on January 12,

2015. Again on January 13, 2015 Appellant deposited in the United States Mail its Notice of

Appeal, such notice was sent regular first class U.S. Mail. See attached Exhibit C, such being the

supporting documents for the Notice of Appeal having been timely mailed to the Kendall County

District Clerk. The Notice of Appeal was sent by first class U.S. Mail, with the correct postage,

to the proper address for the Kendall County District Clerk, bearing a USPS postmark of January

13, 2015 and was received by the Kendall County District Clerk within ten days of mailing. As *3 such, in accordance to the TRCP 5, Mail Box Rule, Appellant’s Notice of Appeal was again timely

filed on January 13, 2015.

F OR THE OREGOING EASONS , Appellant respectfully prays that this court find Appellant’s

Motion for New Trial and Notice of Appeal were timely filed; therefore, a motion for extension of

time was not necessary.

Respectfully Submitted, L AW O FFICE OF K EITH C. HOMPSON , P.C. 11003 Quaker Avenue Lubbock, Texas 79424 (806) 783-8322 (Telephone) (806) 783-8357 (Telecopier) kctlaw@yahoo.com SBN: 24013631 /s/ Keith C. Thompson Keith C. Thompson Attorney for Templeton TTORNEY FOR A PPELLANT ERTIFICATE OF S ERVICE I, Keith C. Thompson state on March 6, 2015 I served the above R RDER on all Attorneys of Record via eFile.gov. /s/ Keith C. Thompson

Keith C. Thompson

Case Details

Case Name: Templeton Mortgage Corporation v. Gary M. Poenisch
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Mar 6, 2015
Docket Number: 04-15-00041-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.