Frutiz, Emir Israel, WR-83,331-01

Frutiz, Emir Israel

WR-83,331-01

| Tex. App. | Jun 1, 2015

Check Treatment

Case Information

In the court of criminal appeals Assim, Texas

$63, 331 - 01$

Casein 1252287-A

Dear court clerk

Please find, weRein a motion to contradict the court finding of fact and conclusion of law, made by the state. In this document you will also find a copy of the motion sent to the command court on March 24, 2015 when you wished, exclusively to receive John Perle21 MPRINIt. SAID MOTION WAS NOT ANONASH, PACKH FIIED, BY THE CONIICTIVA, COURT AND EXEONEOUSLY, MADE THEIR FACT THOMAS AND CONCLUSION OF LAW WITH OUT PRESENTIVA THE DEVECTIVAS TO THE COURT TO BE INDUCED FOR THEIR THOMAS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION OF LAW, SAID MOTION IS MARKED AS EARREN * I AND THE EARREN * 2 IS THE Proof when defects the date said motion was MAIled out to the command court when command an absolute sense of exceretion for NOT INDUDALE IT INTO THEIR thomas.

RECEIVED IN

COURF OF CRIMINAL APPEALS JUN 012015 1525. F.M. 744

CURRU, TX 71134

Petitioner was examined in substance to the act 24.15 but was needed, mentioned in substance to efface and 751 and 24 and the other are that about 145 except to effect, see also efface methods, v. Texas (A) 1714 (5th CIR-PHY).
Theat was not considered personal to deteubine as to whether Petitioner was sometimes of affected to be compared at time, and the factor may be considered as the subject of effect, so that could they be considered in the case of a term that could be used to study the relationship between the two. The other two are not the use of action and the other the other are not the use of the action to test the connection between the two. The other two are not the use of action and the other the other are not the use of the action to test the relationship between the two and the other.

As indicated, theat was not effective, there was the use of the other action to detect the two with different duration and confidence as to effect to find if Petitioner was effective for different, the test at time the relationship, so, was also not effective.

Tetitioner was not effective, and the other was the use of the other action to detect the two, while the other was the use of the other to detect the other. The other was the use of the other to detect the other, so, was the use of the other.

A different action to test the two is the use of the other to test the other, so, as the effect of the other was not the use of the other, the other was the use of the other to detect the other, so, the effect of the other was not the use of the other.

The other was the use of the other, but the other was the use of the other.

The final case states TETRUZZI SIGNE WITH AFFICIENT ABOUT THE CASE ON NUMERIOS COOSSON. A CRONDED-NOID-DUER CELL WITH NO FORM TO SPEAK TETRUZZI AND FREELY DOES WIT CONSEILT AS SUGAR CONTENTIMENT AND THE OLD ROSED INE SPACE WAS EXPANE BE HED TO SIGNIFT TO SUZI ETEE THE HIGANDS FATHEREN D.A AND POLITNOR. HE SMOKED NO INTRESE WHAN SO EVER BY NOVEE COMMER TO CONSEL WITH POLITNOR IN CONSTI WALL (UAR) RICHARD WILL SAKED THAT.
The case finds that RAVED ON TETRUZZI AFFICIENT INE DID NID VANT THE AFFICIENT AT THE UAR EXPANE FATHER IT SIS SW 24 SII (RPI) SUGAR ONU TREACO TO RS CUEAT THERE TIMES AND HS COOSEL WAS FUND INTRESTIV. HOW DO TOU NINUS INTRESE IN A CASE WHEN COURSE DUGAR FUEN WANE TIME TO TAK OF AMMUTE ANITRIAN. 20 HOW SAH STME SEN BE WAS EXPRESVE.
The case finds TETRUZZI FUED TAL A PHONE INVESTANCE WITH COURS SHAMRED. WOW WHAT OTHER FUCHAS WEE FUED BY JOHN TETRUZZI? WHY IF HE WHAD OF SHANG SO ME ON NUMERIOS COOSSONS, LILE HE CLINES DID HE WIT FUE A MUSIAN TO SURVESS FUCKENE, OR FUE A MUSIAN FOR T.S.I KUANUNAI POLITNORE HED GO TREACOS COMMUN. RACE FUCKENE, WHAN TED THE PHONE INVESTANCE TO EXPANLY? OTHER THEM SUGAR A CHEEK?
The case finds that the PHONE INVESTANCE VISITED POLITNOR IN COURS WALL A TOTAL OF DIDNE TIME, ONE AUGH RECURSE WALL SHOW THAT, SO WHY YOULD SAME ASIE THO SUEEDO TO TETRUZZI WHO NEVER VISITED POLITNORE. WHAD HE WANE DUE SO HE VOULD OF KALLD THAT THE PHONE INVESTANCE OULI CAME BY TO RAVE ME SHAN A TOTAL RICHAMY FAMILY LAMBEL TELUAA ME SHE WAS PROFING DID OF MY COURY PARTICE CASE. WENE SHUND ACK ANI COOSSUANE IN REEFAKDS TO THE ALLESHERNS, TETRUZZI WAS WONE SHAMTED TO TELL OURY WHAT SAID INVESTANCE TED OF TALKED TO.
WALL RESEER SACC. SO THOSENANCE (15.) THIS IS WERE TETRUZZI TREATED TO WHAT TO CASEY OUT HS THIS IS WHO TETRUZZI IN A CROUDED HOLD-DUER CELL TOTAL WAN IN INMEDIAN TREACO. IF THE WAS NOT DO CHEEK COURY FALSUGALL THEY DETERATE INHANE WITH SUCH CHANGE, SO AS TO NOT FUTURE THEM IN DANGER, WAN INHANES WHO DIDNE SAKE SUCH CHANGE IS LIEUY. THOSEN SEE EXHIBIT? THOSENSEN THEUY THE EVER HADNST OF MAIDNE OTHER THEN POTTIDNE (UAR) YOUNGES THE PROTESSIONAL CONICIT AND NOT REAKEIN IN PHONE, EVER OULY A VIRANOUS BUT KINGD COD ANINET SIKLE EVER OR A.B.A.

*6 16 The same final return! Decusses the case with petitioner event time on such order. This issue has been disclosed with only one but twice in response to (1) Basicsm and one step of the defense when the only time we speak is duein most session on the costs which time and under seessure 1 17 The case find that according to return is defibint, without the return that the discussion, he never says how defibint should not do so we regard with key. This is due the case that the in teined, and do not prove a valid result to him. 18 Return to the case, we have found the case, even time it was on such order.

The case find that the action of return, that the defibint indicated the was family of the charged offense, who would reject about to such a maximum time in time of a decided end one. So, if the end of the way would and one with the the costs time, but even for what ever was offered to this? Do this can the could if there was not ever any evidence of an time so without my so-called free of could the same would have nothing but a mean say, Mr. return is clearly favory to work with the mean and effective course, reference (in)(if) (2) And (3) why would we continue to discuss if I wanted to free to my then the return of the return to deham the mean with the sewth recee.

Return to deham, he seems if we have no more than two terms, these see below. If this action is deham and defibint and the return on the return, these are false.

*8 The APILONDS CLANE TWA HIS SIDERENT TO WILY WAS CONDED IS NOT CREDIDAE.

GENERALITY AN APPLIATE COURT SHOULD APPEND MOMIS TOTAL DEFERENCE TO A TOTAL COURTS DETERMINATION OF THE WEDRING FACTS THAT THE RECORD SUPPORTS, EXPERIANT WHEN THE TOTAL COURTS FACT-FINDING ARE BASED OR AN EXPANATION OF CREDIDALITY AND DEMEANOR. APILONDS CREDIDALITY WAS NEVER A QUESTION 30 WAY NON?

COURSED DETERMINATION OF CREDIDALITY SHOULD BE QUESTION AS TO WHY WE KLEETS DUTPATING A FORMER DETECTIVE WHO WAS OPEN TERMINATED FUND AND YOU HAVE FURTHC OFFICIALS WHO WOULD NOT DREE REALLY ON HIT.

AFFILMENT TWO OTO ERET INFORMATION FROM PETRUZZ. AS TO WHAT WEEK HIS OFFICIALS AS FURTHUZ? HOWED ONLY TPAK NEVER TAKING THE AND DISCAREED APILONDS TROA WANING TO BO TO TOTAL IT APILOND WANDED TO PLEA EAGLY, WOULDNT WE HAVE TAKEN EMBLISHER WITHUS QUESTIONAL IT? WE MOUSED NO TOTAL BECAUSE DIA AND SIDER WIDD ERET LIFSET AT WANING THEM TIME AND WOULD CHIE UYE.

ABOUT PETRUZZI SHOULD, WE TOLD PETRUUER TIME WE WOULD WAVE HIS RELAT TO APPERL BY

PREASING EALITY! WE NEVER DRO ANTHINE, WE HAS WAKING DETERMINED NOT TO BO TO TOTAL

WE CULD HAVE GREEN APILOND THE OPTION OF PROBATION IN EXPANDS OF A EALITY PLEA, HOWEVER

WE TOTAL COURT COMMITED AN ASSE OF DEDERION FOR NEVER ADMINING REAL FUNDENCE WEAVING

IT EVERY TROADS OF MAKE WIL TOD SUPORT THE EALITY PLEA OF THE OXTERSENCE IN PROBONNCE

TO MIX LIS THE COURT COURD NOT NEVERY THE EALITY PLEA WITHOUT THE EXIDENCE TOWME SUPPORT

WE SAME. THE ONLY ENDENCE THE COURT WAS WAS A CONDED CONFERING FROM A TOTALS.

DETECTIVE FUND FOR BEENA AMKINGE BUT WARSI AND LETS NOT FAVERT HIS CONDET IS ANTHING

BUT PROFESSIONAL.

ONCE MAIN TOTAL RECORDS WILL NOT REFLECT WAS EVER ADMINNING IN PROBONNCE TO

EXPANTE MENTISEY. Y TROA'S 894 F2A 423 (5 19TH PLEA) OF EXPANTE AMEL 153 S.W.2A 34A

TEX, OCHLAR PLES. ONCE HOLIE APILONDS CREDIDALITY OU HIS IN SAME IT IS WAS BO, NOU CAN

TOTAL COURT NEVERY A BO OWLED EALITY PLEA, BUT HIS BEENAE ADMINNINGMENT IN ROBANDS AN

APPEND WEEK HAPPEN. WE CAN HIS BECKCE TO EELNE ONLY WHAT IS CONDINENT TO DENICD

EFFICIR WOULD BE TO DENIC THE TROTH.

If MYLIGHT WOLD HANE UNREGEDD AS STRIED BY PETELEZO AFFICULT, MOMENT IT REN'T ESTEFL FOR MYLIGHT TO SEEK DEPERE ADJEDCATION. PENN'T HE WAS NO ORMING REN'TED, P'AT WAS ONLY STREN'TING GPDON TAKE (1) T.O.E. OR TAKE UP TO USE IF TOOKE CASE TO TRIAL, TETELEZI WOLD REMEMBER 1 DO NOT ELEN'T WANT THE (1) HE HAD TO EALY TO MY FAMILY DO THE COULD TRI'T TO COMMUNE PIE.
THE TRIAL COURT MALES TO DESCRETCH'T EY MAKING SUGH STRENENT. ROY CAN'T THE TREATMY HANN'T WANT TRIAL CONSERVED REPHEEN AFFICULT, THEY SALAD STAND OF WIRMS IN RECORD, WHAT MOTION'S DID DETEES ATTENVEY FILE TO WAY MYLIGHT? DID WE EXHUST ALL NEEWIE PEEPDE SUGUAN'T THE ONLY TWO GPDON TO TAKE (1) OR TAKE WARNER THERMING IT'S, ORTHOUS, EY'T HE, LACE OF INTENT IN THE CIDE EY, NOT EVER YOUNG SUGH'T IN LAIL TO REPING THE AND DETERNE FACILIS' SECH DOLICATE ALLEGATIONS. THRO, WHY HE TIEED TO CERT MY FAMILY TO CONVINEE ME TO NOT THANN'T THE TROON TME, HE WAS TEXESITANT IN MYLIGHT SHARING FOR TIME.
A PLEA THAT IS MADE AS A RESULT OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COURSEL, IS NEVER PICE OF VOLUNTAILY MADE IT'S ONLY A FICULT OF DEEFFYION AND NEEILED.
THE MYELIGHT'S CLAN'T THAT TRIAL COURSEL CURCEED, WHY TO PROGEND CULTU'T IS NOT CREDIBLE THIS IS ONLY AN ORTHOUS OF THE TRIAL COURT. THEY ARE NOT SHOUL'T IS MOM'T TO MAKING PEEPNS AS SEEN ON EVERY DAY NEWS WITH TAKEE GEDDDS, VOLUNG INNJEENT PEEPDE, AND POTRE ECUNG EXCOMMATED FOR CULMES, THEY DID NOT COMMIT. SO TRIAL COURT WALL PROTEET HOW TETELEZI EVER THOUN'T THE RECORD WILL SAWN'T THE SHAM OF A EXPRESENTATION CULMES, FAIED TO MEET THE SAHN AMEDIMENT OF THE TUE PROCESS OTHESC OF THE HOW AMEDIMENT AND DEFINALY FELLINGER THE TWO FOCUS OF SENCULAND.
A MARE IN DEPTH WOLD HANE TRONED ALL CLANTS EY MYELIGHT TO BE TRUE, HAD THEY SELIVED AND INVESTIGATED THE METHOD THE CONFESSION WAS GRAIN, WOLD HANE SHOWN'T NO HISTORY OF ANY TREE OF MAJINGS, CRIMES, WHAT HANE SEEN NO CUTEBEYE TO SUSSEN'T A PRESSOY ALLEGATION, THEIR WAS NO MOTIVE AS MYLIGHT WAS POTREN'T OF MIXEDING IN AN INNJEMEEN'T WISK CMLDREN AND NEVER ONCE HAD ANY CONSERVEDS OF ANY DOES, MYLIGHT MAKING HAD FAMILY WAS POTREN'S AT EVERY PERCING WILLING TO TESTEY IN MYLIGHT'S BEHALE, THAT AS CAN'T PEEE SEEN THEIR WAS NO INVESTIGATION WANT SO - -

*10

1. EVER. Just A STATEMENT A TLEA OF EHILT AND MORHIN MORE. PITRUZU JUEST WIMMED TO RELY SUEY ON PENNEE INSTORATOR WITHIN EONSURHN' IN GANININDESTEATING IN MEDIUM V. STERE BUT SIN'ZA TO THIS COURT EXPRESSED A DETERNE CONSELL. HAS A OUTY TO MAKE AN INDEPENDANE INVESTIGATION OF THE FACED OF THE CROE AND NOT RELY SUEY ON WHAT THE PROSECUROR PERSONTS.
APHICANT TOLD PITRUZU THAT TAMMU AND PUBMED WILKD BE WILLING TO TESTIY IF WEEDED INSTORAT V. STERE THE WILKING TELLING OF THE FEL. THE ING THLING PITRUZU'S GFFEL OF ITIYEARS, IF A PARKAS PENNEE WILKD OF EVERY EENHED ALL SAND WITNESSES WILKD OF OUNE FALMES ONCE MORN' TO DROW APHICANT CHARACTER WILKD HAT THOW MORN' TURPULIRE AND THAT SUEH ALLEGATION DID NOT FIT PERSONA OF CHARACTER. IF HE WILKD OF USED SAND WITNESSES WIDO SULAD PENNEE MORHIN' AS WELL IN ACCURONATE TO TEX. MUT THOI SECTION 2 a (i) AND UNING TEXAS RULES OF ENDEEMEE HELK AND YO'S THAT WILKD HAVE BEEN ADMINISTE AND A GREAT DETERNE STRATEGIE. MORN' OF CHILDREN, FAMILY MOREN'S AND NEURIDERS CULD HAVE TESTIFIED TO IT ONUL' IF WILKD EN PITRUZU' OF INVESTIGATK.
APHICANT WINSTELING TO RESPONSING THE TEXA COURT TIME EN NOT WANING EACH INTINUUAL ONE AN A TIME OUT IF ASKED TO WILKD HAVE DISNE TO WITRUZZINEN. PEDEREN, AS TO PITRUZZI ALLENCH MEEN FIRST OFFTRE FAMILY THAT WAS MONNY IN CULT TO DRAW SUPPORT TO APHICANT: AS STATED IN TRENDRAPH (SX).
ACCURONLY TO TEX. MUT THOI SECTION 2 a (i) AND UNIER TEXAS RULES OF ENDEEMEE HELK, YO'S THAT WILKD OF HAVE BEEN NOT ONLY CONCEISIVE IN COURT PALL A CREATI EXPATIVE.

HOW IN REDARDS THE CONDUSION OF LAM WHICH IS SUEY FORCED ON DRAW PITRUZZI ARXIPANT THE ORIGINAL COURT OF AFTERUS BRUGD. POLD AN PERSOND TO CLARITY WHY CULAJEEL FALLED TO VISIT APHICANT IN WALL, WHY DID HE WELKD SPEED TO DETECTIVE WILK' TO MAKE APLUT THE CUEIDE CONFESSION OF WHY DID HE NOT TELY TO RELY APHICANT OUT DETERNE ADJUDCATION IF HE WAS ADVICING NOT TO DID TO WALL, AND TO DRAW TROOF OF WHAT'INS PENNEE INVESTIGATED DID OR DID NOT DID?

*11 SUBJECT: State briefly the problem on which you desire assistance.

PLEASE SINE ME THE DRIES LEGAL MAIL WAS HAILD OUT TO THE HARDS CAUSED DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MORTF OF HAVICT. [ will be SENDING THIS TO THE COURS TO SING I HALEO OUT IN TIME. MY LEGAL MAIL.

THINK YOU FOR YOUR HELP IN THIS MATTER.

Name: EMIL I FRUTZ

Living Quarters: AIGAT

No: ON 25/26/46

Work Assignment: UNITOR

DISPOSITION: (Inmate will not write in this space) 1) $3 - 20 - 15$ 2) $3 - 23 - 15$ 3) $3 - 25 - 15$ 4) $3 - 9 - 15$ - Lawe office of John Petrucci

11-50 (Rev. 11-90)

*12 ISRAEL FRUTIZ #01/425/626 STEVENSON UNIT IS2S FM 766 CUERO, TX 77954

CHRIS DANIEL MARCH 24,2015 MARS COURTY DISTRICT CUENA RESCAUSE NO. 1252287-A to. BOX 4651 MUSION, TX 71210 - 4651

DEAR CLEAR. EXCLOSED,TEASE FIND MY OBJECTIONS TO THE MEFIDANE OF JOHN TSTRUZZI IN THE MORPHENCIIONED CAUSE.

I RESPECTRALLY RECAUSES THAN YOU BRUNS THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT AS TOW EARLYCEST TIME TOSEASE.

I FURTHER RECAUSES THAN THIS MEFIDANE AND ATTACANTS OBJECTIONS BE ATTACHED TO THE MORPHANISM SIF LAW THIS WAS SUBMITED WITH THE ILDIT ATTUCTION DO THIS IS MY BE TRESIDENTED TO THE COURT OF DIMINAL ATTEALS IN ASSIN, TEAMS SHOULD THE NEED ARME.

I HIRAD UKE TO THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR TIME IN READERS TO THE MATTER AND LOOK EVERWARD TO YOUR RESPONSE, I REMAIN . . . .

RESPECTRALLY SUBMITED. Zima, Zihally.

*13

*14 10- PERLAND WIRDERSIFL TO TROSE ALERTATIONS CONDRAINED THE ALLEGED NEOPAMINED SENUM- ASSANT OF ALCHILD, ILLINOULD HAVE BEEN CONDINERED THAT A PERLOD OF MAKE HOTELS YAO TROSED SHIEE THE ALLEGED WIDDERL AND THE ARREST OF TMS APPLICANT AND DURING THE PERLOD OF TIME ALLUCKSING THE COMBINATIONS YOOL A PERLODYL WIRDERSIFL SAE TROSED TURING UNITROSES OLD, APPLICANT SOMALS THAT TROSE WAS NEVER ATTMA TREE AS 10 THE ALLEGED WIDDERL AND YO ENIDENEE WAS DUPANTED 10 OTHER PROOF AS 10 THE EANCI TREE OF THE OFFENSE, WHA SICH THE MITIGATING FACTORS WEEIN ARE, IF SICH AN ALERTATION OF CONDENEE TOR TROSE WHILE THE WEEIN WAS IS TENES OLD, THEN UNITER TROAS SENSIF THE OFFENSE WIDD. MAY BEEN TRED AS AN NEOPAMINED OFFENSE AS PERLOD TO A NON-NEOPAMINED SENEENEE YAO THE WEEIN BEEN PLTONES IF AGE, COMBINE: TROAS TENAL CODE 11.01 (C) TO TROAS TENAL CODE 22.021 (D), 11.15 THE LINN OF TMS APPLICANT THAT THE OFFENSE CURREED OLD SAME BEEN ARSED AS A SECOND DEGREE TELOID IF A TROAST THAT WAS NOT ONE TROSEED, WHA NEOPAMINED SENEENEE WIDD, WHICH YOULD CAUSE THIS APPLICANT TO HAVE 10 SENE, ONE- BILE IS OF HIS TIME, REMED, WHA SICH, APPLICANT SOMALS YAS DURING WAS WEREKETIVE TOR SAILING 10 THANDE, NOT APPLANDATIVE TARSIS FOR SICH, SECOND QUESTION RESPONDED TO BY JOINAL PERIODAL 2. WAS THE APPLICANT ELLIGIE E FOR PROBATION? (MEWER) THE APPLICANT WAS NOT ELLIGIE E FOR PROBATION FROM A UNIT, THE COMBL OLD, NOT SAVE PROBATION WITH FINDING OF SHIET, BUT COULD SAVE DEGREEED, ADQUERCATION PROBATION? APPLICANTS TERSY AND REPLAINERS HENICE, VIEWLED IN DOOR TO THE BUMATUM OF REPLAINERS BANDS TO THE APPLICANT, DEGREEED, ADJU- BOSTON IS PROBATION FOR ALL, INTEGENE RARSSES, AND, YOULD, HAVE ALLOWED THE DEGREESED TO SENE AS SENEENEE TREE FROM PERSON AND IN NO WAY, CAN YOUN PERLOD, CANN, APPLICAN WAS SECLUERED, FROM BUT FORA OF PROBATION, SINCE IT WAS CLEAR WE WAS NOT EDING TO A UNIT, IN THIS INSTANT OFFENSE, REPLAINERS, ANY ATTORNET, WHO IS ADQUERING HIS CLEANS, PREE INTEES, YOULD, DESTANITY EVER TOR AND/OR PERLAND, SOME, FORM OF REA, DOLL FOR PROBATION, DEGREEED, ADQUERCATION, AND, TO SHIELY TURED, ELLINO, AN APPLICATION TO THE COMBL FOR PROBATION, CAN ONT, BE VIEWLED, IN, ONE, WAY, WEREKETIVE.

THIRD QUESTION RESPONDED TO BY JOINAL PERLOD? 3. DECLAS THE SIFES, YOUND, TO INVESTIGATE THE CASE IN DROOK 10 REFERENE FOR REA, OR TRIAL? (MEWER) ISRAE WITH THE APPLICANT, BEEN, HIS CASE ON A NUMBER OF, OCCASIONS, I RESPONDED THE OFFENSE, REPORT, WHEN, INCLUDED THE APPLICANTS, STATEMENT, WITH THE APPLICANT, I FICD, A MUTION OR PRINSIE, INVESTIGATE, THE COMBL ORANTHD, TO MUTION, THE PRINSIE INVESTIGATE, VENCED THE SERVICANT, AT THE WIL, DECLASED, THE CASE, WITH THE APPLICANT, AND, RESPONDED, IF THE APPLICANT, YAO - -

*15

*16

*17 SCUVE OF THIS OFFENSE, MOREONE AFRICANI SHIMMS IT WAS, THIS VERY CONSEL, WHO FURDLE CUREED. WH, HED THE TIEA OF SURVY. TH, DIRTHR. THAT WE HAD NO OTHER CITTON, AND TO PROCED SOA LAY THILL WOULD BE MALE OF A EDITION ON THE VISUE. AND WE COULD EXPECT MORRIS. THAT A LARGE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR HIS EFFORTS AT JUSTICE. CHETR GUERSON. RESPONDED TO YOY JOHN PETRITZL. 8. (THERE DISCOE, WH THEREIE DERNEE TO) DISCODED WITH THE AFRICANE AND THE ORTHOUS TEEME. DINS THE VISUALITY OF SUD DEFENSE. (ARWER) THE AFRICANI NEVER TENDED AN'THROMMING THAT LED, TO ANY DEFENSE TO HIS CASE AND SAID WE WAS SURVY OF THE CHARGES. WE ADVDED WE WHATED TO READ SURVY. AFRICANIS. TEEFLY AND ARRUMENT. AFRICANI ARRUES. THAT BESEN' THE SURVEY. THIS SO LAY THE ELAME ON HIM, AND IT IS SHAPLE, AFRICANI DOES. NOT KNOW NOT IS WE TRAINED TO UNDECERVED. WRS. A LOOKAL DEFENSE IS THIS IS WHY WE HAVE SURVEY, SO THAT THEY CAN INVESTIGATE THE CASE AND DISCOVER A DEFENSE AND ONCE. HOW THIS IS NOT THE DOES OF A FRANCE INVESTIGATE. WHO IS NOT TRAINED TO SKII DEFENSE TO COMMUN. OFFENCES. SQUERTH GUERSON. RESPONDED TO YOY JOHN PETRITZL. 7. DID THE AFRICANI EVER ALLEGE. THAT WE TOU THIS THE SHAPEMENT WE EXCHIDED TO SMOKEH' LLLY. WIS. CONDED? (ARWER) THE AFRICANI NEVER ALLEGED THE SHAPEMENT WE EXCHIDED WAS CONDED. AFRICANIS. TEEFLY AND ARRUMENT. AFRICANI PROFERS. THAT WE IS NOT TRAINED IN THE SCIENCE OF LAW, WAS NOT ANAVE OF THE LEGAL PROVIDERS. THAT THE LAW ENTHEREMENT COULD, NOT CROSS, AND WAS NOT EVEN EXCHINIDANCE OF WHY SUERCION TECHNIQUES OF HOW THEY, WEE EXCHIDED, AND TO HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE IS TO WAVE NO WAY OF COMMUNICATION. WHAT HAD HATTEKED, IT IS THE EVEN SENTREN'T OF THIS AFRICANI. HAT SENTREN'T LLLY THERESEND, WITMIDATED AND ALLUCED TO YOY EXHILY NOT REWAY, SWEE SIRUED I NOT CROSS TO TEELE. HIS VERSIGN OF THE CASE IN CRIET, WREAKTONE, THIS AFRICANI WHY NOT HAVE USED THE ENCY-VERSIGULAR OF PROFEE STIRINS, THAT THE TOUY WAS CLEANLY MADE TO SURVEY. THAT WE HAD SE-REATED, THERE SAFTS AS THEY WEEL TED TO HIM LLLA. SERDEANI LLLY AND AFRICANIS VERSIGN OF THESE EVERAS WEEK RELATED TO THE EVER OF HIS ABILITY IN SUGR A PROFEE. WITRONMENT AS THE HARIDO COUNI WUDNEY CELL, AFRICANI. RANDERS THAT JOHN PETRITZL IS NOT UNDERSTANDING. THAT TO TRY AND INCEPING A CLIENT IN AN'THROMMING SUGR AS A WUDNEY CELL, IS TO NOT CONDUEt AN'THROMMING AT ALL, IT IS WICH- PROVIDE TO EVEN THIKE A FRECON WOULD DISCOE SUGR ALLEGATIONS AS THIKE FRESCATED PERKIN,

*18

EXERLIG QUESTION RESPONDED BY JOHN PETRUZZI

THD THE APLICANT EVER ALLEGE THIS SECOND VIMUMA LILY THERATEND THE APLICANT VITR ECOIN INVIVY IF WE TRO NOT CONTEXE? (MEWER) THE APLICANT HERR SERIED HE WAS THERATED TO EWE A SOUTHERN.

APLICANTS REPLY AND PERLIMENT APLICANT CAN OBE SYMMIT TO THIS HUNDRANGE COOK THAT COMMON SENEE WOULD EXTANE THIS SCRITED MEWER AND THAT HE PART IN This COOKY WILL SEE THRANTH THE UN-TRUTH.

QUESTIONS HIME THEU SWITEN RESPONDED TO BY JOHN PETRUZZI APLICANTS REPLY AND PERLIMENT: APLICANT WERS THAT EACH MEWER PROFERED BY JOHN PETRUZZI HAS BEEN INTENDED TO STERE THE PEACE. HAMY FROM HIS FALLICE TO PARTICIPATE IN AMY INVESTIGATION, AND OR ENGIN TAKE THE TIME TO VISIT HIS CLIENT IN COUNTY WILL BE AS TO AMY SHOPALENCE OF THE RETIRESENTATION. CONTINUITY, PETRUZZI FALLS EACH ON THE PENWE INVESTIGANE AND THIS TURTH AN ATTENT TO VAY THE SURJECT MATTER AT HIS PEET, AND APLICANT PRAYS THIS HUNDRANGE COOKI SEE PART THIS FLOUR EFFECT THIS WINDERSE UNDER TAD NOT REGNES AN MYSTERY FROM THE PENWE INVESTIGANE. THE FROM JOHN PETRUZZI AND IT WOULD BE SASE TO SAY, THIS CHAIN THE PENWE INVESTIGANE A CHAKE, CHAWES ARE HE WOULD LAY THE SHAME AT THE PEET OF JOHN PETRUZZI, ITS A SHAME OF PASS-THE-PACK. IL IS CONFECTLY OBSIDUS FROM PETRUZZI'S ANSWER THAT HE SAILED IN INS ACTIVITED CAPACITY TO PENWE COMPETENT RETRESENTATION, IL IS FURTHER OBSIDUS THAT WITH THE VITLE, TIME SPORT WITH THIS APLICANT, PETRUZZI WAS NOT ABLE TO FALLI EXCEPT THE CONFERED ALLENTIONS FROM MADE BY HIS CLIENT AND SIMPLY DISMUSSED THE CLANDS AS IS FALEY-TALE FROM TAD BY A POND MAH LOOKING FOR ECCASE, WHEN FACT THE TO-TRERAL MAUVE OF THE ALLENNOUS OF PAUCE MEADHOUT DID TO COME TO VIVIT SWITLY THEREAPREY WITH THE SEXEENIT IN THIS CASE, BEING FRED FOR THE SAME MEASATIONS MADE BY APLICANT TET HEAT UNWESTERNED BY JOHN PETRUZZI. WITH RESPECT TO THE ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS 9-11/2 IT IS CLEAR THAT JOHN PETRUZZI CONFORT WAS MORE OF A DS-SERVLE TO THIS COOKI AND HIS CIGAIL. THEN A SERVIVE AND HIS INVOLVNS DID FALL PERDAL THE SEANDERDS OF REASONABLE REFORMANCE, THIS CASING, THE ADVERSASON, TESTING TRODES, COMPETITATED BY THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO FACTER COMPONNNG, THIS EXCHAL EQUE.

WITHUIT WINNING HIS CONTENTION, EACH HIRANICE RESPONDED TO AND EACH ONE UNWESKED, BE IN TROFF MEETS REVUE, JOSUAA V. DEWITT F. 34450 (STP.CR. 2000) RESPECTRAN SUPPAMED

*19

Wheezare Hemges onbidered, MERCANE ReSPOUTANI SUPPLI, TMS, ang OBVERTIONES TO the NEFIONIT OF JUNN PEIRUEL UNTH REPLI AND MERCANEU NITUR RESPECT TO BROUNDS TOR MEMIER S. 1-8. AND EXPANIATION NITUR RESPECT TO BROUNDS AND ANONERS TOR. 9-18. AND A SINGUING OF ECOLOGIAE TO MYOID NEUOCAHN AN EMIDENTIANEI WEAKING TO REPONVE MARKINI FACTS, WHECK IF RESOLVED IN HIS FANOR JULIAD EMITILE HIM TO HANNERS RELVEF. Respectual Submitted,

Verification

ISRACI FRUITZ, PONZSICH VECTY AND STME UNDER PERMUTI OF PERLIVY TUM IAM THE MANO, MEUCAHN IN THE FONDONEI DISUMENI TIILED MERCANES REPLI TO DEFENSE CLUANGI. JUNN PEIRUEL MERCANE IN RESPANE TO INEFFECTIVE MORTANCE OF COMBEL CLANDS AND ALL MERRED FACT AND LAM CONTANNED THEREM ARE TME AND SURVEET. RespectuUly Submitted.

Certificate of DEBtice

ISRAEL FRUITZ HAVE PLACED A COPY OF THIS TOOUNEAT IN THE U.S. MAIL. POY LOMMED. ON THE STEVENSON UNIT OF T.D.C. 3 IN EURO, TEXAS TISSN ON MAKER 24, 2015 AND NO COPY HAS SEEN FOMBREED TO THE MYORNEY JUNN PEIRUEL. RespectuUly Submitted.