YES, THE DISTRICT COURT DE DEVAN!, TE I. DEATOS COUNTSY HAVE TRANSMISSIOND MY AADUCATION!, AN! HAVE ENCLOSED A LETTER WITH A AROUMERT AS TO MY ATTONNAS AFFIDENT AND THE STATES BE ANAVE. IN ASSING CAN YOI REASSE LOKET IT! HAVE No RECORD OF MY TRIAL AN! HAVE IS MEMORY SO THEY HAVE AN ADVANTAGE BUT IF YOU CAN! THE A LOKET MY AADUCATION!, MY ENCLOSED AROUMERT AND MY HAVYERS AFFIDENT! I WOULD OUARY AVERREIATE IT BECAUSE HE HAS FAVED TO ATTEMPT TO ANSWER MY SECOND PRUNIT OF ERROR.

THANE YOI HITSTON Bunderedfotelesio SANTH ULT 1313 Cantry Me 19 LAMBOR,TE 79231

*2 BRANON HUTCHINS TOC:3-10*1775964 Smith unit 810 County Rd 19 KAMESA, TX 7931

MAY 6 , 2015

CALVE No: 10-03654-CRF-244-A the state of Texas v. Branon Hutchns TO the Hailorate Juide of Snii court: YED I Just RECISED My Response From the state as well as my Lifuyers Affordant in which they are asking for you all to deny my relief starting that (Do Not Know the (2) Parts set out in STeICLAND v. WASHINGTON, HILL US LADY (1924). The first step set out in STeickland is that the defeniment must show my counsels performance was deficient. I THINK I satisfied that due to the part of 1) My lawyer DANG HUBUM NEGER WANT TO HUVESTGATE UNITIM UNTHESID TIMOTHY MURRAY + ASHURY BROUSSARD AS TO THEIR IDENTIFICATION TETMONDY IF they Actually took a look at the peace meant their are part my Attorney KING All those of the Poohs identified but come Allerkind the the PAPER work (Pulke Recht) ADMy REFORE TELL My Attorney "NEVER" CAME AN CONSULTEO WITH NIE PART ANY TRIAL STRATEGY, AS A MATTER OF FECT THE MEETINGS MAVER LASSED 10 MINUTES, BUT I E AN NOT SEE HOW CELVINE EAN GALY HE WAD FUNCTIONS AS THE COUNSE EMPERATESD BY THE SIVTH(6) AMENDMENT WHEN YOU KNOWINGLY SEE THE IDENTIFICATION WAS WROUND AN PART FINE A MOTION TO SUPPERS. ENTHER MORE NOT ONLY KNOWING OF THE POOHS DENTIFICATION but you obseeve the state Prosecutor SHEAK THE TWO (2) WITHESSED INTO THE COURT FROM AN YOU RAISE NO OBSECTION. AS STATED IN MY MEMOGRANISUM IT WALLLO HAVE ALAWED THE GOURT TO YOUNG A REPRESS CUTSIDE THE PRESENCE OF THE LIVEN AN REPONSE THE STATES PROSELLTOR TO SHOUL THE IDENTIFICATION WAYENT TRINTEO, My Attorney EVER TAKED TO OBJECT TO THE TESTINUOY OF NIE MURRAY + MRS. BROUSSARD. HOW CAN HE BE FUNCTIONS AS THE CALVEST EMPERATESD BY THE SIVTH(6) AMENDMENT WHEN YOU KNOWINGLY ALLUS THE STATE TO CHEAT NE AUT MY FREEDOM SECOND PRoHIS, My ATTOXINS DEPONSO NE OF A FINE TELL WAYEN THE OBSERVED THE STATES ACTIVN OF BERNHING

*3 IN STATES UNTHESSES ME MURPHY + MRS BREUSSARD. HE DOESN'T KNOW WHAT WAS SAND PETGER? THE (2) ME MURPHY, MRS BRESSARD AND STATES PEDSSELTER. ITS A FACT THAT'S IN THE RECORD THAT I WAS THE ONLY INDIVIDUAL IN THE PLOTO LINE UP THAT FITED THE SUBJECTS DESCRIPTION, ITS A FACT STATES IN THE RECORD MRS BRESSARD SAND "I AND "I WERE CLOSET TO HEX MEMORY WITH *I BENN MORE SIMILAR. WITH THAT KNOWLERE AUDIE HEX HUBUM SHOULD HAVE CHALLENGED THE IDENTIFICATION. ALSO IN HEX HUBUNS AFFICANT THE MAVER STATES AS TO WHY HE MAVER INVESTIGATED (INTERMED) AN THE UNTHESSES WHO GLAVE STATEMENTS IN THE DPD'S SUBFLEMENTAL PERCESTS WHICH IN MY AFFUCATION! I STATES IT USOULD HAVE PRODUCED WITNESGBE FOR MY COMPULSING PROCESS RIGHTS TO BE PROTECTED, BECAUSE IF YOU RAND THE PLUCE SUPPLEMENT PERCES WITNESSES RESINA SEEVERY AN FENNETHA PUCER STATES E EALTHOUG FRENKAUN HAD LARGE AMOUS OF MORAY. MY ATTORNAY DIDNT EUGH WITNESGBE THE UIDED NOT TAKEN FROM THE PARK FACT A STORE ATTATCHED TO THE PARK WHEH GALS THE SUBJECT WAKING BY. I PROHASE IF YOU WOK AT THAT UDED YOU CANT TEL IF THE SUBJECT HAS TATTOOS OR NOT, AND TO COMPARE ME TO A SUBJECT TEL A UDED IS UNPROFESSIONAL OR AS STAICKLAND SAYS "DICFICIAT." BY THE STATES THEORY OF UNHERING TO CONCLUSIOUS ONCE THEY HAD A SUBJECT AND BY MY ATTORNAY USING THE AS A TRIAL STRAIESTY DIDNT ALSO THE TO HAVE A FAIR TRIAL NON WAS IT A ECUD THEDAY. TAA ASKING YOU AN TO TREE A ECUD WOK AT MY WITT AS WEL AS MY UNIVERS AFFICANT? AN YOU WIL SEE HIS SO CALL DEFENCE STRAIESTY WAS FRIVOLUS AND CONSIDER THE BUSENCE THAT WAS ADMUTED AT TRIAL. PHYS PERIUDICED BECAUSE BY HIN NOT OBJEETING TO THE IDENTIFICATION + IDENTIFICATION TESTINUUY THIS ALLOWED THE SURVY TO CONUCT ME BECAUSE OF MY ATTORNAY THERY. IF HE HAD DISPOSED THIS WITH ME I USUUDNT HAVE WAYT TO TRIAL THINK YOU FOR HONELDS ME. I FEEL A EVIDATORY HEXPING IS LECESARRY.

SHUCKER Brunckin DANIAN HOTELINS SHITH WETT 188 CUNITY RO 19 MAMESA, TX 74331