*1

*2 COURT OF CRiminal Appetls OF TEXAS

ON Dec 23 ous Applicant wNote AN wRit of Habers Corpus, ON JAN 12 WAS File A Motion- -REQesting Designation of Issue. (1) Whether the Applicant was denied Afair and Imperial Hearing and not whether the Applicant Judgement is Void.

The case not sobig is twenty-three years old and is use for Exparte in Indisment as a Frargently on Indisment. Applicant did not Sign Pier bargain and fell to go before the presiding Judge in District Court 183th. The

Exparte Knewly Voilàed the wRit of Habers Corpus Time of Answer Designation of Issue. On Jan 14. ous Signature of the Residine Judge in District Court 183th Has been over sixty-five working days. Applicant Have Not Receive from Exparte A State Professed Finding of Fact Conclusion of Law and Order from District Court 183th

The Above Stake ment is True and Correct on the date of

Effomax 22mith 809681