History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lovett, Lamar
WR-76,670-06
| Tex. App. | Jan 26, 2015
|
Check Treatment

*1 To whom is my concern: 168745070 - 06 my name is canar Loadt 1687450 Jam doing this proSe fam not an Athouney nor can 7 be held to the same Schlingent Standards as an Athouney. I have recently put in a motion dor an Evidentiary Hearlas that was denied. There was and are grounds dor an Evidentiary Heariog or a New Trial on an extreaneous odfence that had evidiences well as testimony dron a Salhouse Informat who got a dea! Son his testimony was admitted during my Trial cqueset D-1-DC-10. 909094 it is nat adnisslable that ar to beins dismived on Aug 24h 2011. This is clearly a uldadlon of my poe process Risdofast, dor a new trial at least or a обыniskalifilof the original cause nambos have beer dismised addorave in my conuledlon. why was my notlondordhe EFildientiary Hearies der led your attention in this matter is greatly appreciated Choric you Canar Loadt 1687450 S10292 "D 06 SIV3ddy TynWing 30 JbnoC Mi 03A3038

*2 All on binal caysertis tace becn slsmixed along w/th solldad Donts comnld capdsim yndor 2011

Case Details

Case Name: Lovett, Lamar
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jan 26, 2015
Docket Number: WR-76,670-06
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.