*1

Count of Caiminal Appeals of Texas 82, 748-012 Te. Ct. No. 1029072-A Te. Ct. No. 1080203 -A WIR-82,748-OI, WIR-82, 748-O@OQUT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Abel Acosta, Clerk FEB 17.2015 Shann D. Evans ${}^{\text{P}}$ 387198 Alfred UNIT AlOI EM 369 N . Feb. 11, 2015 Iowa Park, Texas 76367

TRAVERSE

In The Above Causes, Reply to the Finding of Fact. Number ${ } {7}^{7}$ states applicant is eligible for discretionary mandatory supervision. This is incorrect. I do not have a conviction listed under (H.B. 1433) Sept. 1, 1996 Number ${ } {8}^{8}$ States applicant's conviction for possession of a deadly weapon in a penal institution was not listed as one of the ineligible offenses on the date the applicant committed the offense. This is correct then, and right now. Which shows the 11.07 Writ of Habers Corpus was filed because of effects committed to the applicant. Number ${}^{\text{I}}$ 14 States The applicant does not allege that the parole based failed to follow the proper procedures in denying his defense on mandatory supervision. This is an incorrect statement. Ground One of my 11.07 pg. 6

$$\text{Pg}1\text{of}2$$

*2 States The people panel has misdirected the Board of Predors and Predes about the rules for Mandatory Super- vision Prede. This is a violation of Tex Rules of Evidence Rule 403.

Applicant STAWN Evans Mawn Eamt