Thomas, Stephen Silas, WR-11,635-08

Thomas, Stephen Silas

WR-11,635-08

| Tex. App. | Feb 17, 2015

Check Treatment

Case Information

SHARON KELLER PRESIDING JUDGE

LAWRENCE E. MEYERS CHERYL JOHNSON MIKE KEASLER BARBARA P. HERVEY ELSA ALCALA BERT RICHARDSON KEVIN P. YEARY DAVID NEWELL JUDGES

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

ABEL ACOSTA CLEBE (312) 463 -1551

SIAN SCHILHAB GENERAL COUNSEL (312) 463 -1597

January 28, 2015 Stephen Thomas #317322 Clements Unit 9601 Spur 591 Amarillo, TX 79107-9606 RE: Trial Court Case #W80-15637-N(E) Dear Mr. Thomas: After a thorough search of our records, we find that you do not have a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals at this time. If you have any further questions or concerns, please direct them to the District Clerk in the convicting county where you originally filed the application.

I am herewith returning your documents.

AA/vj Enclosure

Re Stephen Silos Phoma

Plamenks Cisis 9601 Qour 591 Smarillo, Raxas 99107-9606 Cane 41 420-15637

To the Clerk's Office: Chbel Apostu, Clerk

This 2 Response to the Trial Ceurk findings of facts and Conclusion of Law in cause qumberd 41 420-15637 All documents, all pertinank unsformation pertaining to the above Cause are to be forward to the Criminal Court of Appieats at Austin Kras. Please file this brefore the Court for Review

*4 Wir No. 1 W 80-15637-NE

In the Criminal Court of Appents

Applieants, in the 18th

Austins, Texas

Applieants, 18th, Sexting

Ameliores, and objections to the adopted Findings of Quats, and Proposed Conclusions of Law, Sexting to this Cause, W. 80-15637-NE

Ameliores, and 18th, Sexting

Thena 41

Applicant contends that the adeptal findings of Inats and Conclusions of law that there rendered by the 1956 th Judicial District Court of Gallus County Dexas, was an abuse of the Counts deserestion by not responding to the directed issue of Complaint set forth in the original application for Writ of Hakeuse Corpus 11.07 in the Cause numbered $P$ 8015637-NCE. Q. The alledged allegations of Breached "The Agreement" are Consistent with the denial of "One process of the law, and due course of the law. through Applicants entire proceedings are issues of Probative Dulles, and when erroneous errors are believed to be present, these essential elements of the application for Hakeuse purposes must be properly addressed.

*6 Apllicant directs this Count of Appeals attention to "Count Under" render in Cause numbered $13 - 57073$ the 233 rd Judicial District Count of Rallos County (now Cee Exhobit-A Judgement of Convention terms of Nica Agreement). The Honorable Kirk Thagmus of the 23rd Judicial District Count of Rallos County, and the District Afterna office made a Judicial Contract with the Applicant in this cause, namely $13 - 57073$ , in Nica "Concurrently" with Cause numbered 1322 15231. That the terms of these agreements held a significance. Certainly, the Quaturer terms of his Parole and its status could be state gained any problems of how this is 7 month State Card Sentence", would, and should be administered by the Prison System, when and if over the situation would present itself, for the Parole Board of the Leas Department of Criminal Justice to consider how or which would become or have the "controlling custody" of the Applicant at what time, in the imposed Sentence.

*7 of importance the Criminal Court of Apppeal Should know that Cause numberal 2-13-57073 Was recently challenged throughout the Court of Apppeals WX-11405-07, 11/20/2014 Said Cause was denied without a written Order based upon that said Cause was a discharged Sentence, the haberse purpose of relief. "Nowder," Collateral Consequences" that arises from this 2010 Convention of 13-10070 that have subjected the Applicants to "Cruel and Unravel Punishments, and is a ongoing injury in the Applicants" parole Proceedings, and involved a continuceer denial of the fitness of the law and due course of the law. Applicants parole Status was "Reubed" due to this errorcour error by 20.03. that violated the terms of his plea agreement. Dr. Parole Evocation hearing and the introduction of cause * 13-5070 Parole hearing for Cause * 20-15637. 1007 Related a Judicial Contract made entered, and executed by Courts Order and have Dilated the rights of this Applicant to fair and impartial Proceedings throughout his entire Sentence in Cause (Junkend 2-30-15637.

Thomas 4 4

Applicant point to the "States' Respond Findings of facts, Conclusions of Law, and order" (pa 1-2) "Don though his Judgement in that case ( $13 - 57073$ ) reflects that the sentence is to run "Concurrently." See: (Ornese's Support tinding t 5 50-15637) The Trial Courts Response Exposed Findings of facts, Conclusions of Law, "conceived in the facts that the sentence rendered by the 993rd Judicial District Court was intended to run "concurrently." Applicant is humbly requesting that the Criminal Court of Appetts each cand every material evidence of facts through Exhibits A- $t$ set forth by Applicant in his Original application Cause t 5 50-15637. Review the fact that Applicant entered an Agreement with the Judicial System" and that an Judicial exceration of order" was rendered. Applicant is requesting the Criminal Court of Appetts to acknowledge that Cause t $13 - 57073$ , did not run "concurrently" with Cause t $50 - 15637$ , as ordered and agreed upon in Applicant's "law agreement."

Thomas 45

Applicants is reguisting that the Count of Cappeals ackndwledges that the leas Department of Cistinal Justice did error and Dielated the terms of his then Egreements and by Drolating the terms of the Dlen Egreements teios the Conoistion from what was erignally agreed, and eidered upon by the 283 nd Jutical Wistrict Court of Dalles County, leas that the Criminal Court of Cappeals will See and determine that the Texas Board of Dardons, and Diercles did entertain, used echibited the said Conoistion to revoke the Applicants, Darde in Cause of $f 80 - 15637$ and that the Futurer Droccedings of Applicat Darde Review under Cause numbered $f 80 - 1563$ I, are under the "Collateral Consequences" and harmful effects of Cause Mlndord $f - 13 - 57073$ , the "Breached" Dlen Bargain, Egrecment, a "Delo Centros" "that the Darde Review Board will Prever entertain upon when ever ask "How did Applicants return to the System? Thy-ll always rter to the Cause Tumber $f$ 13-57073 this is the very means of "Collateral Consequence".

*10

Conclusion

Applicant firmly contends that his application for haberse relief is true, and correct, and the alicdged allegations therein is heuld be property acknowledge and entitle to addressel.

Applicant belicris that the trial Count Respence, "Proposed findings of Tacts, Conclusions of law, and order" fails to address the essential elements of Capplicant applications for hakease relief.

Applicant at no limen mentioned therein hes application a "Yine Credit or Yine resolution dispute" Applicant, contends that the Oral Count abuse the deserestion of the court, under the exhaution of his State remendies to Property address the emergency issues of a Makease Corpus pleadings.

Applicant belicves his objection to the Tacts and findings of the Count are needed and within the order of processing this application. He now request a full and intense review of his application forlbs.

*11

$W$

considend thevein thes Kegener, and objections to the Erial Ceurts findidgs of Yacts and Conelusions of Law. Ippolicand new prays that the Court of Criminal Appeals at Clestin Jexus, seevives this in good faith. That the Court of Criminal Appeals Keven the entirety of Cause numbered $£ 80 - 15637$ and Cause numbers $£ 13 - 57073$ and that in the interest of Justice, and equality finds that the adledged allogations therein be graated the, the Applleand. We doe's so phuef