History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ramiro and Edna Ramos, and Federico Salazar, Jr. v. the Unknown Heirs of Tomasa Gonzalez and Narciso Gonzalez
04-14-00667-CV
| Tex. App. | Jul 7, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*0 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 07/7/2015 10:52:06 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk *1 ACCEPTED 04-14-00667-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7/7/2015 10:52:06 AM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK CAUSE NUMBER 04-14-667-CV _____________________________ RAMIRO AND EDNA RAMOS AND FEDERICO SALAZAR, JR., APPELLANTS V.

THE UNKNOWN HEIRS OF TOMASA GONZALEZ AND NARCISO GONZALEZ, APPELLEES ____________________________ IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO TEXAS _____________________________ ON APPEAL FROM THE 381 st JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TRIAL CAUSE NO. DC-09-559 HON. J. MANUEL BANALES, PRESIDING JUDGE ____________________________ THE APPELLEES’ SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THEIR COMPANION BRIEF ________________________________ TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

The Appellees again motion this Court for an extension of time to file their

companion Brief and, in support hereof, show the following:

I. DEADLINE

The Appellees were granted an extension of time to file their Brief to on or

before 5:00 PM, 3 July. As of the moment this Second Motion was filed, no

submission date has been scheduled.

II. LENGTH OF TIME SOUGHT FOR A SECOND EXTENSION The undersigned motions for an Order of this Court allowing for an extension

of time to file the Appellees’ companion Brief to the date it is marked received.

III. THE FACTS IN SUPPORT OF THIS MOTION

He was unable to timely-file the Appellees’ Brief because the repairs he

thought were being done to allow him access to his laptop’s content took longer than

he was told they would, and when he finally got the laptop back, some of the same

problems he encountered the first time it began malfunctioning reoccurred.

Therefore, he had to return it for more work, and it was only by 10:00 AM,

Monday 6 July that he was able to start again on his penultimate draft to draft his

final draft, which is filed along with this Motion.

Finally, the undersigned had a major breakdown of his car, which caused the

loss of more valuable time.

IV. NUMBER OF EXTENSIONS.

This is the Appellees’ second Motion, and will be the last because their Brief is

also being filed.

V. CONFERENCE WITH THE APPELLANTS’ APPELLATE COUNSEL The undersigned did not confer with Mr. Miller about his position respecting

this Second Motion because he decided to concentrate on getting the companion Brief

filed with this Motion.

Based on the foregoing facts, the undersigned motions this Court for an Order

allowing for an extension of time to file the Appellees’ companion Brief on the date it

is received.

Respectfully Submitted By: ____ / JOHN A. OLSON/ ________ JOHN A. OLSON Tex. Bar No. 15274750 20634 Creek River San Antonio TX 78259-2084 210-307-0336 Office 210-858-6780 Fax jaolson_ccda@yahoo.com *4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I delivered a copy of this SECOND MOTION, etc., to the Law Offices of Mr. Keith

P. Miller and Ms. Megan C. Kucera, the Appellants’ Attorneys, on 7 July 2015.

___ /JOHN A. OLSON/ ________ JOHN A. OLSON jaolson_ccda@yahoo.com

Case Details

Case Name: Ramiro and Edna Ramos, and Federico Salazar, Jr. v. the Unknown Heirs of Tomasa Gonzalez and Narciso Gonzalez
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jul 7, 2015
Docket Number: 04-14-00667-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.