Dehoyos, Julio Delarosa, WR-73,684-01

Dehoyos, Julio Delarosa

WR-73,684-01

| Tex. App. | Mar 30, 2015

Check Treatment

Case Information

*1 CAUSE #18-0060 18th District Subicial Court somexwell county - Texas

REF: THE STATE OF TEXAS VS. SULIO DEHByOS

TO: ATN of Henorabk Count of APPEAIS - TEXAS AUSTIN, TEXAS

I Julio DEHayes come before this Henorabk Count for Remedy/intervention in following matter:

SEAT TO 18th District Subicial Court via mail: via district clark of said County on or about last week of October 2014 A MOTION FOR A Bill OF REVIEW TRADEING Proceedings and ON January 19th 2015 A letter directly to Hon. Judg of said County that Tins frame had elapsed for a railing/answle. No RESPONSE To this date:
Withholding of evidence (TACL w/this filing) primarily A DRS. Medical Report of No Trauma to Victims Peivates Nor evidence of TAN Hygien since accusation was of insertion of Fingers as in Muad to Tinto Vagina. Doctor Jame L. CoFamn/m.b.
Months prior a 13-14 ye. old mark TEXs exhibited his penis to my daughter (victim at school) Neithin School Nor Shekitts Dept. Notified me Nor my wife. Found out when boys mottin came to my residence To have a heart and deep changes on her son:
NEW EVIDENCE: TO WIT: ITEM #2-Medical Doctors findings. No Abysical Findings.
COHERCION by one Samxwell County Deputy Junior Frenandiz A TEXAS BONN as in BONN Hispanic when is Racist against Hispanies from Mexico as myself, I, To make matter work Have a below average I.O. For Texas Dept of Criminal Justice
Continent Institution Division. I AM RATED AT I.O. OF G.P.

COURP of criminal APPEALS AVENUE, FOR WORTH, TEXAS 76104-2796. NO Physical Findings. MAR 272015 DATE - 06/05/07 Payt - 1 of 2

*2 7.) I ask for this Honorable Count of criminal appeals of Texas to look into this legal matter of violations of constitutional laws, Rights by the 18th District Count of some somewell county-Texas in Glen Rose, Texas against Julio Schogos and that this count limitation all recovers EN Basic and removed to 18th District Judicial Count a New Hearing / New Tain / Appointment of an Attcancy and Investigation as noted and asked for in motion for a bill of Revisw Hearing / Proceedings or any remedy that this Count finds appropriate.

I make these issues known to this Honorable Count Knowing Penalties of Reginary and attest all to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge; So help us GoD.

Incl: Doctors findings which were withheld by District Attcancy from me and my trial Attcancy and with my illiterate mother accidently found after my family broke up... B.) Copy of motion for bill of Revisw Hearing as excited since we inmate do not have eight /uxury to a copy number.

Dated: March 24, 2015 Note: Phase ACKNOWledge Receipt. thank you.

MPIENANT $y$ Jutro Schogos $2 / 482389$ C.T. FREKET-1300 FMRS

Rostowen, Texas 77583

H. EXAM / CONSULTATIONS / FINDINGS & FOLLOW-UP:

IMPRESSIONS, FINDINGS, AND FOLLOW-UP: Pediatric Examinations Reveals:

PLAN-Check if applicable) Spassurance regarding health of genitalia. Return to regular family doctor for routine medical care. $◻$ E.ly of medical report to caseworker and/or law enforcement agency.

Other:

AFTERCARE INSTRUCTIONS: $◻$ Follow up appointment $◻$ Counseling: $◻$ Follow up tab: WARN and verbal information went to parent / guardian / patient (circle) $◻$ ACI $◻$ Return to school/work $◻$ PCP Literature $◻$ Referral list $◻$ Physician list $◻$ Ambulpatory guidance

CookChildren's.

801 Seventh Avenue Fort Worth, Texas 76104-2796 PHYSICAL & SEXUAL ABUSE MEDICAL PROTOCOL (Page 9 of 9)

RUN DATE: 10/11/07 RUN TIME: 0820

Cook Children's HCIS LAB LIVE Summary Discharge Report

LOCATION

* REF: COST & $18 - 0060$ i SimSALVd Chity-Tiess

| PATIENT: DEHOYAS, ROSA | | | | ACCT #: $\begin{matrix} 400006053842 AGE/SX: & a m p; 14 / F STATUS: REG CLI \end{matrix}$ | LOC:
ROOM:
BED: | CARE.CMC
REG: 06/05/07
DIS: | $& a m p; U #: M002240601 & a m p; REG: 06/05/07$ | | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | | REG DR: | COFFMAN, JAMYE | L MD | | | | | | | Test | Day | Date | Time | Result | Reference | Units | | | $= & g t;$ HCG SERUM | 1 | JUN 5 | 1625 | NEGATIVE | (NEGATIVE) | | | | $= & g t;$ CHLAMYDIA GENPR | 1 | JUN 5 | 1600 | NEGATIVE | (NEGATIVE) | | | | $= & g t;$ GONORRHEA GENPR | 1 | JUN 5 | 1600 | NEGATIVE | (NEGATIVE) | | | | $= & g t;$ HEP C VIRUS | 1 | JUN 5 | 1625 | NEGATIVE | (NEGATIVE) | | |

CHIVE 18-0060

THE STATE OF TEXAS V. 5

Julio Dehogos

In the district count of some well country-Texas 18th Judicial BISTRICT

MOTION FOR A Bill OF REVISW Hearing Proceedings Come) Now the Defindant, Julio Dehogos filing pro-se who says to this Court "CHHOREN LIE" that we expect and as a society they to change that as they age, However, unfortunately Adults tend to also engage in deceptive and wrongful conduct And when that involves a matter betwe the Court, we as a society need to expose it wherever and wherever it occurs. The Defendant represents to this Court that his case is just such an example of which Reascectarial Power is allowed to Run Amuck. The Defendant Now represents to this Court: 1.) the Criminal Hearing Known as a Bill of Review Rececding is designed to prevent a manifest In Justice (see: Kelly Moore V. Northcast, 426 S.W. 2d 591) 2.) Defendant claims his convictions was obtained by and was the product of the States use of Extrinsic French. 3.) Defendant defines Extrinsic French as French which denies a Party the opportunity to Fully Litigate-upon Trim, all rights and detenses that the Party is Enstitred to Assext. 4.) A Conspiracy between the Resecuting Attcursy and Detrusc Attcursys To govern Actions that would untmity influence the outcome of a Case, would certainly qualify a Extrinsic French. 5.) A Resecuting Attcursy Encouraging a detendants Triml Counse 10 To "Just then this one out," certainly constitutes a wrongful act of that opposing Counse/. (see: Wernbly v. Herera, II S.W. 3d 924) 6.) AN Action (Ie: filing /tending) to unto an Incorceret Former Ruling Judgement must be brought in the Court Reheciving the Judgement. (sse: Garza k Rodzéprez, 18 S.W. 3d 694)

$Rege - 1 of 4$

*6 Courtinunner of Age I 7) Grand affects totally even the most Sofemn Judgement(s): Decrees. (sec. Diehl v. u.s., 438 Fzd 705, 92 S. Ct. nf69) 8) Grand is a valid Gerand for setting asside a Piase Judgment, if that Grand was Extrinsic. (sec. Grey V. First Nat., 393 Fzd 371, 89 S. CT. 378,393) 9.) misconduct of anely or conuse/ is Extrinsic Grand. the Defindant thinks ye ol Pervebial, back Room Deals (about his life) distinctly kinks as misconduct of Conuse/: 10.) Grand Vitinies EVERY Transnotion Tainted by ST, EvG Judgements, sec. Decluitt v. becluitt, 613 S.w. 2d 777, young v. Tex. Emp. - 488 S.w. 2d $551, 1 / 2$ Dudky V. Lander, 468 S.w. 2d 460 ) 11) the Defindant represents to this Conet that the was prevonted form having anything even close to Presumbling a Poir Tain due to Extrinsic Grand. (sec. Tice-City-, 767 S.w. 2d 700) 12) A Bill of Keview (Hearing) Proceeding to set asside a Judgement that is No Long Appetitable is a valid Avenue at this Time. (sec. Turnsweed v. Bousse, 772 S.w. 2d 407) 13) this Conet has subject matter Inesudiation here. (sec. Modemid v. Mat. 883 S.w. 2d 652 ) 14) once if is Found Likely that a Bill of Review Extrinsic is Suffering under Weanfully obtained Judgement (I.E. Convection) that is unsupported by the weight of Evidence, Equily is Satistied and Coner should Grant the Requested Relief. (sec. State v. Tewll, 778 S.w. 2d 463) 15. The Defindant represents that the state (Reassortor s. CPS, et.21) did tnentionally mislead this Conet and his Convection should be set asside. (sec. e. Beyle v. Bevil, 259 Fzd 506) or at the Very least his Judgement should be Reopened. 16. The Defendant represents to this Conet that the state kept a Parly (with Erculpatory Information) Anay From the Conet. (sec. Ince V. Ince, 58 S.w. 3d 187)

Page 2 of 4

17.) the Defendant Represents to the Couat that if "exertion Parties" were granted Testimonial + Transactional Immunity by the Couat just prior to their testimony (to avoid any Hunky Panky Shenongus by the state to have a chance to tornpse with them) a massive fraud would be exposed. 18.) the Introduction of Fabricated Evidence is found on the Couat and this Couat should be enraged about this Conduct by the state as the Defendant is. (see: Judgment in Exters) 19.) the Doctrine of Laedes does not Tins Bore this Reading. 20.) Wrong doe (Ie: the state) shall not impose Exterms. Vigilance or promptitude as a condition of exercise of a eight of injured Person. (see: Section V. Miller, 391 S.W. 2d 568) 21.) the Real Couat enjoys wide discretion (In debiterium Judicle so to say) in this matter, and if is its decision that would be subject to appellant review. (see:Wolfe v. 2nports, 500 f. 2 d 628) 22.) To give this Couat a test of what the Defendant can revisit at this Hearing, the state literally told a Panky, Not to tell Being Forth the Truth. - or they Could get in Trouble. 23.) All the facts need to be examined as a Hearing. (see. Aitech v. E.I.L. 23 F, SUPF 2d 546) 24.) Results and In Couat adscendion by the Couat-Could result in the Call for Couats of Inguley Proceedings, Pew C.Ce. Pews.52.01 (-and in such case an Attorney Pro-Tem will defintify be Nested. 25.) This Hearing is called for Prassant to the Texas state constitution, not 1, & 13. (see: Crethagas v. state, 113 s.w. 3d 481.)

Argument

years ago the House of the month revescationimunfently resulted in the Reifreading of the Defendant. Now a family stands town apant and a young Woman is buefured with Guilt Involuntary Imposed on her by Corrupt CPS Classworkers and a Overzentous Presector. Now Past

Page 3 of 4

*8 CONVITION INVESTIGATIVE EFForts will show the miscorriings of Justice that has occurred here, the Count Shonld not hesitate in Greenting the Relief now requested by the Defendant.

PRAYER

The Defendant prays that this Honorable Count will grant him a Hearing as outlined herein this Motion, and After Investigation, the Issuance of Subpoena (s) and the said Hearing, set aside his conviction, order a Judgement of Acquitted and if it bears its appropriate, expect a Count of Inquiry into the Conduct of the States Asysts and expressitatives involved in this Case.

RESPCITIFALLY submitted by Julio behayes, Feb.-Se C.T. Years 11-1300 PM LST Rostromen, Texas 77583

I, Julio behayes TBCS 41482389 at C.T. Years 11-1400 PM LST-Roshoren, Texas 77583, Barzorin County dislore under Amalty of Penjury that the Statements and Associations made there in this Motion are Tense and Correct to best of my Knowledge, So help me God.

Page 4 of 4