History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rodolfo Rodriguez v. RG Options LLC
13-15-00215-CV
| Tex. App. | Oct 8, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 NUMBER 13-15-00215-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ RODOLFO RODRIGUEZ, Appellant,

v.

RG OPTIONS LLC, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on August 5, 2015. On August

26, 2015, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly *2 injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the

8th day of October, 2015.

2

Case Details

Case Name: Rodolfo Rodriguez v. RG Options LLC
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 8, 2015
Docket Number: 13-15-00215-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.