CONES NOV, SENnickWILKERSON, the Applicant in the abode and numbered cause and files this Motion for Re-hearing and in support of such motion will show to the court the following:

Quoting the Court of Crimina Appeals, dated 3/11/2015: "The court has dismissed without written order this subsequent application for a wirt of habeas corpus, TEX, CODE, CRIN, PRIC, Art. 11, 67, See 4(a)-(c)," "Writ No. WIO-OI84-3(E) was not a subsequent application to challenge the conviction. This wirt was for an out-of-time appeal inwihith Applicant specifically checked the box on the first page of the application, page 1, Applicant also handwrote the notations on the page of (1), indicating out-of-time appeal. The entire State of Texas continues to show prejudice towards Applicant in denying him his due process. WITERFORDRE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Applicant prays that this motion is GRAINTED.

RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRININAL APPEALS NAR 252015

RECETYED IN COURT OF CRININAL APPEALS NAR 252015

RECETYED IN COURT OF CRININAL APPEALS, TEX, 2015, the Reegoiny motion has been U.S. mailed to: Court of Criminal Appeals, P.O. Box 12368, Austin Texas 78711.

CONES NOV, SENRICK WILKERSON

P.Safequard my Liberty

*2 Mard, 23,2015 Courier of Criminal Arbeits P.O. Box 12308 Capital Station Austin, Texas 78711 RE: Presubute PresuDICE PresuDICE ATEN: Court of Criminal Appeals in Austin When has the Laws of Texas changed, where a prosecutor can falsify documents against a BLACKMAN, to show that he was arrested on four (1) different arrest dates, that never once occurred? When has the Texas Law changed where a BLACKMAN can be tried on sex aftersses without never getting arrested, and never getting amargined for them? But our Texas Law requires a first preliminary initial appearance for every felony offence that is charged, after an arrest. See Article 1517 Cate of Crim. Proc. The Clerk's record for cause was 60.018388 F00.018Y, specifically has the documents of: SUBVERSY OF CONVICTION BY JUAY and NONCE of DISPOSITION. Both documents show that I was arrested for both sex offenses on 11/2008, and released on 28/2008. If this is truth, then the prosecutor and Dallas County District Affairey's office totally violated Articles 32.01 & 32A.02 Code Crim. Proc. due to the fact that both instruments were filed on 11/24/2010, that 26 months later, after the alleged arrest on 9/7/2008. Please explain why the Dallas Police Department and the Dallas County District Clerk's office can not produce these following documents, from 60.01838 sexual performance by a child 8,600-siley sexual assault on a child; 1) The files are missing,

*3 27-There are no Complaint Affidants, 3) There are no probable cause information, 4) There are no 4) There are no Diverse Reports, 5) There are no book-in informations, 6) There are no Sworn Arrest Affidants, 7) There is no Arrangement Information, and 8) There is no First preliminary initial appearance information.

The Court of Criminal Appeal is also showing prejudice against Applicant for its failure to exercise due diligence in thoroughly investigating these illegal errors. If the Dills Cunly Courts stated to this Court, that I was a $6^{\prime }{5}^{\prime \prime }$ , white male, with blonde chair and blue eyes, this court would agree because this court never does the proper investigation. Shame on you. A copy of this letter will be forwarded to, 60 minutes investigator and 20/20's investigator.

Respectfully,