History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gray, Donald Lee
WR-82,772-02
| Tex. App. | Mar 19, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*0 RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 3/19/2015 ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK *1 WR-82,772-02 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 3/17/2015 8:18:11 AM Accepted 3/19/2015 1:32:50 PM ABEL ACOSTA CLERK Nos. 82,772-01, 82,772-01 and 82,772-03

EX PARTE § IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL

§

DONALD LEE GRAY § APPEALS OF TEXAS MOTION FOR REMAND

To the Honorable Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals:

Donald Gray, petitioner, respectfully asks the Court to remand to

the district court for consideration of his affidavit confirming restraint.

As explained in his brief, Gray seeks habeas relief from three

convictions for improper photography, Penal Code section 21.15,

declared unconstitutional by the Court last year. Gray’s continuing

restraint affidavit was filed after the district court signed adverse

findings and conclusions but before the record was send to the Court.

Remand is appropriate to permit the district court to evaluate the

affidavit. The State’s answer to the petition recognizes that the Court

has held the statute unconstitutional and appears to concede the writ

would be granted, but for the affidavit of restraint.

Alternatively, in the interests of judicial economy, the Court can

grant the writ on the basis of Gray’s affidavit. If denied, Gray would be

permitted to file a successor writ under section 4(a)(2) of article 11.07,

the actual innocence provision. Section 4(a)(2) allows a successor writ if

the individual is actually innocent of a Penal Code violation, without

any other restrictions. Here, the improper photography statute has been

declared unconstitutional and therefore any conviction would be void ab

initio. It would seem, therefore, that he can satisfy section 4(a)(2). An

example appears in Ex parte Knipp, 236 S.W.3d 214 (Tex. Crim. App.

2007), in which Court unanimously granted a successor writ under

section 4(a)(2) on a double jeopardy claim that rendered the conviction

invalid from inception. Gray’s position appears identical.

Respectfully submitted this 16 day of March 2015,

______________________________ SBN: 00786313

First Place

100 E. Ferguson Street Suite 500

Tyler, Texas 75702

(903) 597-6622

(866) 398-6883 (fax)

e-mail: jamesvolberding@gmail.com Counsel for Donald Lee Gray *3 Certificate of Compliance

Pursuant to Rule 73.1(f), I hereby certify that this pleading

contains 252 words, measured in MS Word for MAC version 14.3.6.

/s/ James W. Volberding

____________________________________ JAMES W. VOLBERDING C ERTIFICATE OF S ERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this pleading has

been delivered this 16 day of March 2015 to:

Smith County District Attorney

101 N. Broadway, Fourth Floor

Tyler, TX 75702

by the following means:

_____ By U.S. Postal Service Certified Mail, R.R.R.

_____ By First Class U.S. Mail

_____ By Special Courier _______________________

_X___ By Hand Delivery

_____ By Fax before 5 p.m.

_____ By Fax after 5 p.m.

_X___ By Electronic Filing.

____________________________________

Case Details

Case Name: Gray, Donald Lee
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Mar 19, 2015
Docket Number: WR-82,772-02
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.