*1 20.12.15

So: abel Acosta/ Clerk RE: CON NO. 09-12-00576-08/TE.C1 NO. 12-13947/200713-11 The concern of this letter is to inquire about why my pro se petition for discretionary review was reused? In their a generated opinion by the Court of Criminal, Special Justice as to why my issues presented were not given any consideration? Was my pro se petition for discretionary review examined by the proper authorities? The reason for concern is so that I can establish a proper argument to present in a Federal Wrist of Babass Corpus. I am not convinced that my pro se petition for discretionary review was given the examination required by law for the determination of my constitutional quaranted right for due process claim of my petition is issues. I would like to know and receive information concerning the Justice's opinion or whether my pro se petition for discretionary review was even pre- sented. So just receive a last card stating that my pro se petition for discretionary review has been reused in not enough requirements for me in regard to knowing why it has been replied. Seeningly, as so far as can be seen in the short amount of time that elapsed before receiving a festival, so that the Court of Criminal, Special made their decision in accordance to the opinion given by the 4th Court of Specials and did not rebeew or Also any consideration to the issues presented in

*2 my preve position for discretionary review. In a timely manner I request to review a response regarding these issues of concern. Your cooperation into this particular matter is of great importance in my pursuit for people' judgment in my cause. It appears to be that the issues raised on direct appeal and in my pre se petition for discretionary review should merit review and examination by the Court of Criminal Appeals. Chanking you in advance.

Respectfully John Pathe Patteven 1903-11-1829-10