History
  • No items yet
midpage
Graham, Christopher L.
WR-82,944-01
| Tex. App. | Mar 4, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*0 RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 3/4/2015 ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK *1 WR-82,944-01 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 3/4/2015 12:12:50 AM Accepted 3/4/2015 4:16:14 PM ABEL ACOSTA NO. _____________________ CLERK EX PARTE ) IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL

)

) APPEALS OF

CHRISTOPHER L. )

GRAHAM ) STATE OF TEXAS

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

Comes now CHRISTOPHER GRAHAM (hereinafter “Graham”) who files this MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR HABEAS filed in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 211(a) and in

support of such motion shows the Court the following:

I . FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On 2/12/2014, Graham called the court to request that the case State v. Chelsie Chenoweth,

be scheduled for court on 2/13/2014. Graham was told by the court coordinator that the case

had been set for arraignment hearing.

On 2/13/2014, Graham appeared at court expecting to be able to resolve this case and was

told that the Court had erred and that case had not been added to that day’s docket. Court

personnel told Graham to return to court on 2/25/2014.

On 2/25/2014, the case State v. Chenoweth, case number 2013CR366 had been set for

arraignment hearing. Graham arrived at the court shortly before 9 am, but was in the hallway

talking to a client on the phone.

Client Chenoweth had already announced her presence to court. At around 9 am, Graham too

announced to the Court that he was present and prepared to proceed on the arraignment hearing.

Shortly before 10 am and after a few minutes of negotiation with the prosecutor in the case,

arraignment documents and plea documents were signed and prepared by client Chenoweth

indicating that she understood her charges in the case and the plea bargain terms.

For several hours, Graham and client Chenoweth waited for the Court to hear and enter the plea

in the case all to no avail .

Movant had to bring the Chenoweth case to the Court’s attention several times that the case was

ready for plea and ready for disposition.

The Court took a break for an extended period and did not hear the plea for Graham’s client.

After Court resumed the Court still did not hear Graham’s client’s plea.

Around 11:45am, the Court entered recess until 1:15pm for lunch.

Before breaking for lunch the Court indicated that before Graham’s plea was to be heard that

there would be several contested cases that the Court would hear before it considered the

Chenoweth plea.

During the recess, Graham went to the Bexar county jail in order to talk briefly with a client

concerning his upcoming jury trial.

13. Due to heavy traffic and delays in transporting inmates in the Bexar county jail, Graham was

delayed in coming back to the court by a few minutes. Graham arrived in the courtroom at

approximately 1:35pm.

14. When Graham entered the courtroom client Chenoweth had been released, the Court

presented Graham with a show cause order, alleging that attorney Graham was in contempt

of court.

15. The show cause hearing was scheduled for 3/13/2014; however, Graham filed a request for

continuance of the hearing because he was scheduled for court in another jurisdiction on the

same day. Graham also called the court requesting that the date for the show cause hearing

be changed, but the Court refused to reschedule the show cause hearing date.

16. No contempt finding or order was ever made or entered at the show cause hearing of

3/13/2014. The case was referred to administrative law judge Doug Shaver for hearing on

4/8/2014.

17. On 4/8/2014, Graham was wrongly found guilty of contempt due to being tardy by a few

minutes and because he did not appear at the 3/13/2014 show cause hearing even though a

continuance was requested.

18. The sentence assessed against Graham was 15 days in the Comal County jail and a $300 fine.

Graham paid the $5,000 (five thousand dollar) cash bond in order to secure his release

pending the appeal of this case.

The Court’s contempt finding was wrong for the following reasons among others:

1) The court did not afford or advise Graham the right to counsel when there was an obligation

to do so because of the possibility of confinement;

2) the Court did not afford Graham the right to court appointed counsel;

3) the Court did not conduct a hearing to determine Graham’s indigency to see if he qualified

for court appointed counsel;

4) there was no finding of contempt at the show cause hearing on 3/13/2014, therefore the

referral of the case to the administrative law judge was illegal;

5) there was a possibility of Graham receiving a sentence in excess of 6 months due to multiple

alleged contempt allegations, thus the Court should have conducted an admonishment about

the right to a jury trial;

6) there was no evidence of willful intent to violate the courts directive but Graham made a

good faith effort to comply with the Court’s order;

7) considering that Graham was dealing with other court related business and where the delay

was miniscule and did not affect the administration of justice, punishment of 15 days was

draconian and violates Graham’s due process rights.

8) There was no evidence to support such a high cash bond of $5,000 to secure Graham’s

release pending appeal of this matter

9) Since Graham was one of the only African-American attorneys on the Court appointment list

in Comal county, he was singled out and received a show cause order and a jail sentence

when other attorneys practicing in the County have not received similar treatment in

circumstances similar to this case.

WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED Movant prays that the Court grant the leave to file its

Petition for Habeas Corpus and for such other and further relief to which Movant is entitled in law and

in equity.

Respectfully submitted, *3 Lauren Graham & Associates PLLC By:

C. Lauren Graham

Texas Bar No. 24047549

P.O. Box 226265

Dallas, Texas 75222

Tel. (469) 605-6846

Fax. (214)989-4258

Attorney for Christopher Graham

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on 3/3/2015 a true and correct copy of MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION

FOR HABEAS CORPUS was served via facsimile to the following parties:

Comal County District Attorney via fax: 830-608-2008

Judge Gary Steel via fax: 830-608-2030

Judge Doug Shaver: 830-608-2030

C. Lauren Graham

Case Details

Case Name: Graham, Christopher L.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Mar 4, 2015
Docket Number: WR-82,944-01
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.