History
  • No items yet
midpage
Elionai Vasquez v. State
02-16-00304-CR
| Tex. App. | Aug 26, 2016
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00304-CR ELIONAI VASQUEZ APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 1426592R

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION [1]

----------

Appellant Elionai Vasquez attempts to appeal his September 1, 2015, conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.021(a)(1)(B), (a)(2)(B) (West Supp. 2016). Vasquez pleaded guilty to the

offense pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, and in accordance with the plea bargain, he was sentenced t o fifteen years’ confinement. The trial court’s *2 certification of his right to appeal states that this “is a plea -bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and that “the defendant has waived the right of app eal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On August 4, 2016, we sent Vasquez a letter stating that because no motion for new trial had been filed, his notice of appeal appeared to be untimely because it was due October 1, 2015, but was not filed until July 26, 2016. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). The letter additionally stated that we may lack jurisdiction due to the trial court’s certification that this was a plea -bargain case and because Vasquez had waived the right to appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). We notified Vasquez that his appeal could be dismissed based on our lack of jurisdiction unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal by August 15, 2016. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. Appellant timely filed his response on August 12, 2016, but did not provide us with any basis of jurisdiction over his appeal.

Because we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal, and in accordance with the trial court’s certifications, we dismiss Appellant’s appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f); Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (holding that if an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the appeal's merits and may take no action other than to dismiss the appeal).

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth BONNIE SUDDERTH JUSTICE PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 26, 2016

[1] Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case Details

Case Name: Elionai Vasquez v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Aug 26, 2016
Docket Number: 02-16-00304-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.