History
  • No items yet
midpage
in Re: International Hospital Corporation Holding N v.
05-16-00615-CV
| Tex. App. | Aug 23, 2016
|
Check Treatment

*1 DENY; and Opinion Filed August 23, 2016.

S

In The

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00615-CV

IN RE INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION HOLDING N.V., Relator Original Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-06257 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Fillmore, and Schenck

Opinion by Justice Schenck Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in which it seeks relief from the trial court’s July 10, 2015 abatement order and the trial court’s March 29, 2016 denial of relator’s motion to lift abatement. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them here.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown it is entitled to the relief requested. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

/s/ David Schenck DAVID SCHENCK JUSTICE

160615F.P05

2

Case Details

Case Name: in Re: International Hospital Corporation Holding N v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Aug 23, 2016
Docket Number: 05-16-00615-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.