History
  • No items yet
midpage
Glynndeavin v. n Fox v. SC Judicial Department
16-6336
| 4th Cir. | Aug 24, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glynndeavin von Fox, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Glynndeavin von Fox appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and dismiss von Fox’s appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. von Fox v. S.C. Judicial Dep’t, No. 2:16-cv-00209-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Glynndeavin v. n Fox v. SC Judicial Department
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 24, 2016
Docket Number: 16-6336
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.