History
  • No items yet
midpage
Burl Howell v. United States
16-1220
4th Cir.
Aug 16, 2016
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Burl Anderson Howell, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Burl Anderson Howell appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Howell’s pending motions and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howell v. United States, No. 5:14-cv-00898-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 29, 2016; Nov. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Burl Howell v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 16, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1220
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.