History
  • No items yet
midpage
Goslow v. Perea
35,088
| N.M. Ct. App. | Jul 28, 2016
|
Check Treatment

*1 VIGIL, Chief Judge.

*2 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of {1} proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

{2}

_______________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge WE CONCUR:

___________________________________

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

___________________________________

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

2

Case Details

Case Name: Goslow v. Perea
Court Name: New Mexico Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 28, 2016
Docket Number: 35,088
Court Abbreviation: N.M. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.