Goslow v. Perea
35,088
N.M. Ct. App.Jul 28, 2016Check Treatment*1 VIGIL, Chief Judge.
*2 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of {1} proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
{2}
_______________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge WE CONCUR:
___________________________________
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
___________________________________
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
2
