*1 Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: ^[*]

The attorney appointed to represent Billy Lane has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lane has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Lane’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for *2 Case: 15-40558 Document: 00513627427 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/08/2016

No. 15-40558

appellate review. We decline to consider Lane’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims, without prejudice to his ability to assert such claims on collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.