HERBERT J. GROVER, State Superintendent Department of PublicInstruction
You have asked for my formal opinion on an interpretation of section
1. If a CESA complies with section
2. If they are, what legal remedies are available to the CESA against dissenting districts who refuse to pay?
3. May the CESA board determine the method of allocating costs between the member boards?
Section
The board of control may purchase, hold, encumber and dispose of real property, in the name of the agency, for use as its office or for any educational service provided by the agency if a resolution to do so is adopted by a two-thirds vote of the members of the board of control and then approved by three-fourths of the school boards in the agency by majority vote of each school board. Aid received under s.
116.08 may be used for the acquisition and maintenance of real property under this section.
The CESA is governed by a board of control composed of members of school boards of districts within the agency. Sec. *Page 297
Section
Based on these statutes, it is my opinion that dissenting school districts are bound by a decision complying with section
Your third question concerns whether CESA boards may determine that the costs of acquiring real property shall be equally shared among the districts or employ some other formula such as that set out in section
Section
I therefore conclude that, based on that case, neither section
There is no formula in section
I conclude that if the cost of the real property is paid from state and local aid under section
JED:WDW *Page 299
