History
  • No items yet
midpage
Susan B. Long and Philip H. Long v. Bureau of Economic Analysis, United States Department of Commerce
49 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1090
| 9th Cir. | 1982
|
Check Treatment

671 F.2d 1229

Susan B. LONG and Philip H. Long, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
BUREAU OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, United States Department of
Commerce, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 81-3090.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

March 12, 1982.

Before TANG, SKOPIL and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The panel determines that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. The Supreme Court has vacated and remanded our initial disposition of this case, Long v. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 646 F.2d 1310 (9th Cir.), vacated, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 468, 70 L.Ed.2d 242 (1981), for reconsideration in light of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, Section 701, Pub.L.No.97-34, 95 Stat. 172. Pursuant to this mandate, we vacate the district court judgment and remand the case to the district court for further consideration in light of the same statutory provision. Our order of May 4, 1981 is reinstated insofar as the appellees are entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs for trial and appellate proceedings up to that date in an amount to be determined by the district court on remand.

2

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Case Details

Case Name: Susan B. Long and Philip H. Long v. Bureau of Economic Analysis, United States Department of Commerce
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 12, 1982
Citation: 49 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1090
Docket Number: 81-3090
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.