History
  • No items yet
midpage
Monckton v. State
92 Tex. Crim. 236
| Tex. Crim. App. | 1922
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Appellant was convicted in the Criminal District Court of Dallas County of the offense of forgery, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. We have examined the indictment and the charge of the court and each appears to be in due and regular form. No error appearing in this case, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ON REHEARING.
June 14, 1922.






Addendum

Appellant presents his motion for rehearing and also accompanies same by an application for writ of certiorari. The facts are similar to those in cause No. 6906, Henry Monckton v. State, and for the reasons stated in our opinion this day handed down in said cause appellant's motion for rehearing and his application for certiorari will be denied.

Writ denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Monckton v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Apr 26, 1922
Citation: 92 Tex. Crim. 236
Docket Number: No. 6914.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.