History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mineola Compress Co. v. Farmers' State Bank of Mineola
1922 Tex. App. LEXIS 786
| Tex. App. | 1922
|
Check Treatment

The appellee brought the suit against the Mineola Compress Company, a corporation, and Rash, Brin Co., a copartnership, for the conversion of five bales of cotton. The defendants plead general denial. In a trial before the court without a jury, a judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff. After a careful consideration of the record, we conclude that the appellants' contention should be sustained that the evidence is insufficient to support a judgment for conversion. It is fully established that the appellee has lost the five bales of cotton, but the evidence does not sufficiently show that these appellants converted it. In view of another trial, the evidence is not discussed or further set out. The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Mineola Compress Co. v. Farmers' State Bank of Mineola
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: May 4, 1922
Citation: 1922 Tex. App. LEXIS 786
Docket Number: No. 2568.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.