History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. State
206 S.W. 684
| Tex. Crim. App. | 1918
|
Check Treatment

Appellant was convicted for violation of section 31 of the Acts of 1917, page 483, making it an offense to use another's motor vehicle without his consent.

The term of the court at which he was convicted adjourned December 8, 1918. During that term he did not enter into a recognizance in order to enable him to appeal, but instead, several days after the adjournment attempted to give this court jurisdiction by executing an appeal bond. The statute (art. 918, C.C.P.) and the decisions thereunder in Vernon's Crim. Proc., page 880, all hold that in order to give this court jurisdiction of an appeal from a misdemeanor conviction a recognizance must be entered into in open court before the court adjourns for the term at which the conviction occurs. This court has not and can not acquire jurisdiction of this case because of a failure to enter into a recognizance. Some of the cases are cited. The Assistant Attorney General's motion, therefore, to dismiss this appeal because of failure to enter into such a recognizance must be, and is, granted.

Appeal dismissed.

Dismissed. *Page 256

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Nov 20, 1918
Citation: 206 S.W. 684
Docket Number: No. 5200.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.