History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williamson v. Heath
108 S.W. 983
| Tex. App. | 1908
|
Check Treatment

The contract of Williamson was not alone a verbal guarantee that the bull was a breeder, but that he would refund the purchase money, less the value of the bull for beef, upon satisfactory proof that the bull was barren. Appellee had no cause of action until this satisfactory proof was made, and this was not done until within two years of the filing of the suit. There was no unreasonable delay on appellee's part. We hold that the two years statute applies. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed. *Page 255

Case Details

Case Name: Williamson v. Heath
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 18, 1908
Citation: 108 S.W. 983
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.