History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hackney v. State
125 Tex. Crim. 353
| Tex. Crim. App. | 1934
|
Check Treatment

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without statement of facts and bills of exception.

In the absence of the evidence the matters presented in the motion for new trial cannot be appraised.

We have perceived no error in the procedure which would justify a reversal of the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hackney v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 14, 1934
Citation: 125 Tex. Crim. 353
Docket Number: No. 16683.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.