History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wisdom v. State
49 Tex. Crim. 534
| Tex. Crim. App. | 1906
|
Check Treatment

Conviction for passing a forged instrument, the punishment fixed at two years confinement in the penitentiary. The indictment contains two counts: one charging forgery, and the other knowingly passing as true a forged instrument. The first count was quashed. The only insistence of appellant that we deem necessary to review is the error assigned that the court erred in holding that the *Page 535 State was not required to prove that the City National Bank of Decatur was a corporation; the second count of the indictment having alleged that appellant did wilfully, knowingly and fraudulently pass as true to the City National Bank of Decatur, Texas, a corporation, a false and forged instrument in writing. Whether necessary or not to allege that the bank was incorporated, we think, however, it was necessary to prove it after making the allegation. This cannot be justly treated as surplusage. We therefore hold that it was necessary to prove the incorporation of said bank. Usher v. State, 10 Texas Ct. Rep., 921; Lucas v. State, 39 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Webb v. State,39 Tex. Crim. 534. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Wisdom v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Mar 22, 1906
Citation: 49 Tex. Crim. 534
Docket Number: No. 3624.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.