History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hart v. State
1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 11
| Tex. Crim. App. | 1905
|
Check Treatment

Appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor. The Assistant Attorney-General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because of an alleged defect in the recognizance. The grounds of objection are, (1) that it does not state the amount of the fine assessed against appellant; and (2) it does not recite that appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor, but in lieu thereof attempts to set out an offense in terms. The recitation is as follows: "who stands charged in this court with the offense of using abusive language, and who has been convicted of said offense in this court." The bond is defective in both particulars. See art. 887, Code Crim. Proc.; May v. State,40 Tex. Crim. 196. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hart v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jan 11, 1905
Citation: 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 11
Docket Number: No. 3020.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.