History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wells v. State
150 S.W. 1163
| Tex. Crim. App. | 1912
|
Check Treatment

Appellant was convicted of embezzlement and allotted two years in the penitentiary by the verdict of the jury. *Page 278

After his appeal was consummated he entered into an appeal bond under the terms of Art. 904 of the Revised Code of Criminal Procedure, the bond was properly approved by the Sheriff of McLennan County, but was not approved by the Judge who tried the case, Judge Monroe, but was approved by Judge Oltorf, signing himself as special Judge of the Fifty-fourth Judicial District of Falls County. The law requires that the Judge who tried the case shall approve the bond. See Art 904, supra. This would render the appeal bond insufficient and not in compliance with the statute. Appellant was released from custody on this bond. Under the law, as it is, the bond being insufficient, this appeal will be dismissed, and it is accordingly so ordered. Dismissed.

[Rehearing denied December, 1912. — Reporter.]

Case Details

Case Name: Wells v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 30, 1912
Citation: 150 S.W. 1163
Docket Number: No. 1890.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.