History
  • No items yet
midpage
First Nat. Bank of Wellington v. Hix
1913 Tex. App. LEXIS 731
Tex. App.
1913
Check Treatment

The motion to affirm and the certificate in this matter show that the appeal bond in the above cause was filed in the lower court on the 16th of March, 1912; hence the appeal was returnable at the preceding term of this court, and as this motion to affirm, with the certificate of the clerk, was filed at this term of this court, this matter is controlled by the decision in the case of Laughlin v. Dabney, 86 Tex. 120, 24 S.W. 259, by the Supreme Court, holding that "the appellee, or defendant in error, as the case may be, must file his certificate at the term of the court to which the appeal or writ of error is returnable."

The motion to affirm on certificate is overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: First Nat. Bank of Wellington v. Hix
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Apr 12, 1913
Citation: 1913 Tex. App. LEXIS 731
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.