History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matlock v. McGregor
1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 208
| Tex. App. | 1916
|
Check Treatment

This is a suit instituted by appellee on a promissory note for $900 against A. L. Matlock, Harry Hyman, Charles G. Johnson, C. H. Moore, and D. R. Scrivener. The case was submitted to the court without a jury, and judgment was rendered in favor of appellee for $1,096.92, with interest at 8 per cent. from date of judgment. Judgment was by default as to Moore and Scrivener. There is no statement of facts. The only point made in appellants' brief is that the record failed to show that either Moore or Scrivener had been cited, and that therefore the judgment should be reversed. Since the brief was filed a supplemental transcript, agreed to by appellants, has been filed, which shows that C. H. Moore and D. H. Scrivener were duly cited. The judgment is affirmed.

*Page 1

Case Details

Case Name: Matlock v. McGregor
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 23, 1916
Citation: 1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 208
Docket Number: No. 5617.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.