History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bida v. State
125 Tex. Crim. 314
| Tex. Crim. App. | 1934
|
Check Treatment

Accomplice to arson is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular and regularly presented.

There is no statement of the facts heard in the trial court nor any bills of exception complaining of the rulings of the court.

The special charges requested cannot be appraised in the absence of a statement of facts. The same is true with reference to the exceptions to the charge given to the jury. In the absence of the facts we must assume that the matter was submitted to the jury in accord with the evidence adduced.

There are some questions raised as to the argument of the prosecuting attorney. This court is not prepared to determine whether the argument was justified by the evidence in the absence of knowledge of what facts were before the trial judge.

No error authorizing a reversal of the judgment has been perceived or pointed out.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Bida v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 14, 1934
Citation: 125 Tex. Crim. 314
Docket Number: No. 16597.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.