Office of the Attorney General — State of Texas John Cornyn The Honorable Jeff Wentworth Chair, Redistricting Committee Texas State Senate P.O. Box 12068 Austin, Texas 78711
Re: Whether the University of Texas System may adopt a mandatory infrastructure fee without express legislative authority (RQ-0500-JC)
Dear Senator Wentworth:
You ask whether the University of Texas System Board of Regents may adopt a mandatory infrastructure fee under existing law.1 In February of this year, the Board of Regents of the University System (the "Board") approved an infrastructure charge for students of the University of Texas at Austin. See Minutes of the Board of Regents of the University of Texas System, Meeting No. 948 (Feb. 13-14, 2002) at 49 available athttp://www.utsystem.edu/borminutes/2-02meeting948.pdf (last visited June 25, 2002). The infrastructure charge, set for the 2002-2003 academic year at $150 per long session semester for a student taking seven or more semester credit hours and $75 per long session semester for a student taking no more than six semester credit hours, would increase annually through the 2007-2008 academic year by amounts ranging from $30 to $85.See id. at 45; see also Board of Regents Agenda Book, Feb. 13-14, 2002, Academic Affairs Committee Substitute Agenda Item at 1a, available athttp://www.utsystem.edu/bor/agendabook/February/yellow%20paper%20aac.doc (last visited June 25, 2002) [hereinafter Comm. Substitute Agenda Item]. According to the request to the Board for approval of an infrastructure fee, "[t]he fee income will be dedicated for the repair, renovation, and essential capital improvement of U.T. Austin's educational and general facilities." Board of Regents Agenda Book, Feb. 13-14, 2002, Academic Affairs Committee at 3, available athttp://www.utsystem.edu/bor/agendabook/February/2-02AacAB.doc (last visited June 25, 2002); see also Comm. Substitute Agenda Item at 2b. "Approximately one-half of the infrastructure charge income will be dedicated to paying for essential repairs and renovations," while the remainder "will be bonded and used to pay debt service on essential capital projects funded by such bonding, many related to fire and life safety upgrades and water control and environmental health issues." Comm. Substitute Agenda Item at 2b. University officials cite as authority for the Board's action section
(a) Each board shall be authorized to fix and collect rentals, rates, and charges from students and others for the occupancy, services, use, and/or availability of all or any of its property, buildings, structures, activities, operations, or other facilities as provided by this section.
Tex. Educ. Code Ann. §
You inquire about the construction of this provision because you do not agree that its language authorizes the board of an institution of higher education to fix and collect charges to support the institution's property or other components. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 2. Education Code section
We note as a threshold matter that Education Code section
Chapter 55 of the Education Code relates to the financing of public improvements by state institutions of higher education. See generally
Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No.
As we have noted, section
Among the limitations on a board's authority to impose a "rental, rate, charge, or fee" are statutes authorizing the governing board of an institution of higher education to charge students a specific fee to finance, build, operate, or maintain a specific facility. See e.g., Tex. Educ. Code Ann. §
Another limitation on a board's authority to impose a rental, rate, charge, or fee is found in Education Code section
(a) The building use fee previously authorized in Section 55.16 of this code is redesignated as tuition.
(b) In addition to amounts that a governing board of an institution of higher education is authorized to charge as tuition under the other provisions of this chapter, the governing board is authorized to charge as tuition in an academic year an amount not to exceed the amount charged under Sections 54.051 or 54.0512, as applicable in that academic year.
. . . .
(f) A governing board of an institution of higher education may continue to charge as tuition under this section the amount that it charged as the building use fee at that institution in the 1996-1997 academic year without holding a public hearing, but may not increase tuition under this section above that amount without holding a public hearing.
Tex. Educ. Code Ann. §
The additional amount that the Board may charge pursuant to section 54.0513(b) has been described as "designated tuition." See University of Texas System, Summary of Statutory Authority for Fees Charges at 6, available at http://www.utsystem.edu/bor/feesummary.htm (last visited June 25, 2002). The legislature has set tuition rates in sections
We consider the relationship between sections
When the predecessor of Education Code section
In 1997, the legislature enacted a bill deleting the terms "fee" and "student use fees" from section 55.16(a) and adopting section
The authority to collect the former building use fee and the limits on its amount are now found in section 54.0513(a). Statutes that deal with the same general subject are construed together, and this is particularly so if they were adopted by the same session of the legislature. SeeWichita County, Tex. v. Hart,
A governing board continues to have authority under section 55.16 to "fix and collect rentals, rates, and charges from students and others for the occupancy, services, use, and/or availability" of its property, buildings, structures, activities, operations, or other facilities. See
Tex. Educ. Code Ann. §
An examination of the statutes shows some similarities between the new infrastructure charge and the former building use fee, designated as tuition under section 54.0513. Both are "revenue funds." See id. § 55.01(3). Moreover, the building use fee now designated as tuition by section 54.0513 was initially set under section
More significant for determining whether the infrastructure charge is actually the equivalent of the "building use fee" is the purpose for which each is collected and allocated. The name given to the payment is certainly not determinative. Approximately one-half of the infrastructure charge income will be dedicated to repairs and renovations, while the remainder will be used to pay debt service on essential capital projects, many related to fire and life safety upgrades and water control and environmental health issues. See Comm. Substitute Agenda Item at 2b. Building use fees have historically been used to fund construction and equipping of buildings. See Tex. Educ. Code Ann. §
Yours very truly,
JOHN CORNYN Attorney General of Texas
HOWARD G. BALDWIN, JR. First Assistant Attorney General
NANCY FULLER Deputy Attorney General — General Counsel
SUSAN DENMON GUSKY Chair, Opinion Committee
Susan L. Garrison Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
