The Honorable Carlos Valdez 105th Judicial District Attorney Nueces County Courthouse 901 Leopard, Room 206 Corpus Christi, Texas 78401-3681
Re: Residency requirements for election to Del Mar College District Board of Regents (RQ-0562-GA)
Dear Mr. Valdez:
You inquire about the residency requirements applicable to candidates for election to the governing body of the Del Mar College District (the "District").1 Del Mar College is a two-year institution of higher education governed by a board of regents elected by the voters of the District. Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1.
You state that the District has historically relied on Election Code section
(a) To be eligible to be a candidate for, or elected or appointed to, a public elective office in this state, a person must:
. . . .
(5) have resided continuously in the state for 12 months and in the territory from which the office is elected for six months immediately preceding the following date:
. . . .
*Page 2(B) for an independent candidate, the date of the regular filing deadline for a candidate's application for a place on the ballot. . . .
TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. §
You point out, however, that Election Code section
Section 130.082(g) does not include a six-month residency requirement, and you suggest that it dispenses with this requirement "in direct contradiction of Section
Brown v. Patterson, which addresses two statutes very similar to the Election Code and Education Code provisions at issue here, provides the answer to your question. See Brown v. Patterson,
The appointed trustee, who had not resided within his trustee district for the six months immediately preceding his appointment, argued that the Education Code provision prevailed over the general residency requirements in the Election Code. See id. at 288-89* The court disagreed and resolved the alleged conflict between the Election Code and Education Code residency provisions by examining the policy underlying the provisions. See id. at 289. It said that the general residency requirements for election to office, first adopted in 1895, represented the longstanding and fixed public policy of the state — that a candidate for public office must have resided in the particular district or precinct from which he is elected for at least six months.See id. at 290 (citing Act approved April 20,1895,24th Leg., R.S., ch. 56,1895 Tex. Gen. Laws 81,81-82). The court noted that the residency requirement would "provide better representation by assuring that voters will be better acquainted with the qualifications and views of the candidates and that candidates will be better acquainted with and responsive to the needs and desires of the voters." Id. It found no indication that the Legislature intended the Education Code to exempt school trustees from residing for six months in the trustee district.See id. at 291. "Such a departure from the long-established policy and political tradition of the state should not be attributed to the legislature in the absence of express and mandatory language."Id. Because the Education Code did not expressly exempt school trustees from residing for six months in the trustee districts from which they were elected, they were subject to the Election Code residency requirements. See id. at 291.
We conclude on the basis of Brown that Election Code section
Very truly yours,
GREG ABBOTT Attorney General of Texas
KENT C. SULLIVAN First Assistant Attorney General
NANCY S. FULLER Chair, Opinion Committee
Susan L. Garrison Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
