Honorable Tom Maness Criminal District Attorney P.O. Box 2553 Beaumont, Texas 77704
Re: Liability for taxes on property where a tax certificate states in error that no taxes are owing thereon
Dear Mr. Maness:
You inform us that a taxpayer received a property tax statement on November 1, 1983. He paid the statement on November 2, 1983 and received a tax certificate stating that no taxes were due on the property. The taxpayer sold the property to a second taxpayer on December 1, 1983. The second taxpayer, relying upon the tax certificates, obtained title insurance for the property. On December 1, 1984, the tax assessor mailed an amended 1982 tax statement, claiming that taxes were owed on the property. Neither the second taxpayer nor the title company is willing to pay the taxes outstanding, each denying liability. You ask whether there is a valid tax lien against the property and whether the taxing unit has recourse against anyone in order to collect the outstanding taxes owed. We conclude, first, that there is no valid lien against the property, and, second, that the first taxpayer is personally liable for the taxes owed.
We note at the outset that article
The Legislature shall have no power to release the inhabitants of, or property in, any county, city or town from the payment of taxes levied for State or county purposes, unless in case of great public calamity in any such county, city, or town, when such release may be made by a vote of two-thirds of each House of the Legislature.
Article
The Legislature shall have no power to release or extinguish, or to authorize the releasing or extinguishing, in whole or in part, the indebtedness, liability or obligation of any corporation or individual, to this State or to any county or defined subdivision thereof, or other municipal corporation therein, except delinquent taxes which have been due for a period of at least ten years.
Any statute that purported to release or extinguish a tax liability owed a political subdivision (except under the limited circumstances permitted by article VIII, section 10) would be unconstitutional. Dallas County v. McCombs,
Section
(a) At the request of any person, a collector for a taxing unit shall issue a certificate showing the amount of delinquent taxes, penalties, and interest due the unit on a property according to the unit's current tax records. The collector shall charge a fee of $4 for each certificate issued. The collector shall pay all fees collected under this section into the treasury of the taxing unit that employs him.
(b) Except as provided by Subsection (c) of this section, if a person transfers property accompanied by a tax certificate erroneously showing that no delinquent taxes, penalties, or interest are due a taxing unit on the property, the unit's tax lien on the property is extinguished and the purchaser of the property is absolved of liability to the unit for delinquent taxes, penalties, or interest on the property. The person who was liable for the tax for the year it was imposed remains personally liable for the delinquent tax, penalties, and interest.
(c) A tax certificate issued through fraud or collusion is void. (Emphasis added).
On the basis of the facts that you have presented to us, it is clear that this situation falls squarely within section
You express concern in your letter that the tax assessor might be liable on his bond in the event of negligently issuing a tax certificate. See International Paper Co. v. State,
Accordingly, we conclude, in the situation you describe, that there is no tax lien against the affected property and that the person who owned the property at the time that the tax was imposed remains personally liable for all taxes outstanding.
Very truly yours,
Jim Mattox Attorney General of Texas
Jack Hightower First Assistant Attorney General
Mary Keller Executive Assistant Attorney General
Judge Zollie Steakley Special Assistant Attorney General
Rick Gilpin Chairman Opinion Committee
Prepared by Jim Moellinger Assistant Attorney General
